human urine good to clean out human ear wax???
Archimedes Plutonium
send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
One, I am naturally curious. Second, I am a genius and needs to have
my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see how a genius
mind works. Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise me have
never really bothered me much; what is worse than them are those
that ignore.
Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple questions often
leads to major insights or discoveries.
For the past 20 or 30 years of my life I have been very conscious
of ear wax. I remember whilst at UC in my undergraduate days, in winter
time having to go to the UC medical to warm water bathe flush my
ear out of wax. Ever since I have taken long hot showers starting off
with a bathe into the ears to keep the wax low. Because of this bathing
routine I have not had any ear wax buildup.
Last night however, I have noticed a slight impairment and suspect
wax buildup in my right ear. To solve it I will spend a good hour or
more
on warm water bathe into my ear until it becomes better.
Recently I have been wondering about the interrelationship of animal
fertilizer for plants and the food that plants give animals. We note the
interrelationship of breathing gases of oxygen and carbon dioxide
between
plants to animals, it is as if plants were made for animals and animals
were
made/designed for plants.
I am searching for an exact mathematical number relationship of
breathing gases between animals to plants. And another number
relationship of food exchanged between animals to plants, in that
animals live from plants and plants need animal fertilizer. These
two exchanges: (1) breathing gases and (2) foods between animals
and plants may have similar mathematics.
In particular to urine, human urine in detail, is that it is a great
food for plants. Just as orange juice is designed perfectly for a
human, and human urine designed perfectly for an orange tree
plant to take in as food and nutrient. In Superdeterminism, these
interrelationships mesh perfectly, as does a jigsaw puzzle, where
its pieces have a purpose and fit perfectly into other pieces.
Now, in the history of humanity, much of humanity did not have
warm water readily available at most times to get rid of earwax
buildup. Nor did many of our ancients realize that by flushing the
ear with water would help to solve the buildup. I suppose many of
our ancients just used a stick or something to get out the ear
wax and many suffered ear injury in the process.
Recently I saw a NOVA program on the Vikings and they found
some hygiene device in a Viking Ireland dig. A silver type tool
to clean out the ear. Sort of dangerous to use.
Earwax is designed, I believe to take care of itself in climates that
are
hot and warm. Not in northern climates such as Europe where earwax
buildup needs special attention.
Some stores carry a mild acidic solution to help cleanout ear wax
buildup.
I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax buildup? If so,
I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine would solve their
ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that discovery? If
human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear wax, then it
is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not Darwin
evolution. This is an easy research test also. To see if human
urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow specially
formulated that it does the job well.
And if so, are there any animals in the animal kingdom, especially
apes or monkeys that are seen to be urinating in the ears of their
members?
I suppose our earlier humans did not live long after 20 years of age
and so they may never have encountered ear wax buildup that would
have hampered and endangered their life further. And that earwax
buildup becomes a human problem only when humans began to live
much longer than 20 years. And those who developed acute earwax
buildup had a shortened life because of their handicap. Perhaps only
when human civilization started do we begin to look for solutions to
earwax buildup.
Perhaps cold salt water also gets rid of earwax buildup and thus
people were guided to swimming in salt water to solve their problem.
David Bostwick
>Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions that would quickly
>send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
>
>One, I am naturally curious. Second, I am a genius and needs to have
>my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see how a genius
>mind works. Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise me have
>never really bothered me much; what is worse than them are those
>that ignore.
>
>Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple questions often
>leads to major insights or discoveries.
>
Fifth, Archie, you are humble to a fault. Where ya been?
James Kibo Parry
"Archimedes Plutonium" (arc_pl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> Subject: human urine good to clean out human ear wax???
Quick question. Is this ear wax in your ear, or ear wax in your urethra?
> Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions that would quickly
> send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
Because you wuv us?
> One, I am naturally curious. Second, I am a genius and needs to have
> my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see how a genius
> mind works.
Yes, you needs to have that. You is a genius.
However, we already know how your genius mind works. (It's fueled by urine
entering through the left ear.)
> Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise me have never really bothered
> me much; what is worse than them are those that ignore.
I'd say they both bother you a bunch because you spend a lot of time
talking about how little they bother you.
For instance, you have never once mentioned Martin Landau, so I assume
he doesn't bother you at all. But you're now insisting that people who
think you're a bozo for putting urine in your ear aren't bothering you,
so clearly it bothers you that you expect people to think you're a bozo
just because you like dipping your head in pee-pee.
(And that is such a flimsy reason to think you're a bozo. People should
be able to find lots of OTHER reasons to think you're a bozo.)
> Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple questions often
> leads to major insights or discoveries.
Such as the discovery that the King Of Science wants to be able
to pee in his own ear?
> For the past 20 or 30 years of my life I have been very conscious
> of ear wax.
Does it talk to you?
> I remember whilst at UC in my undergraduate days, in winter
> time having to go to the UC medical to warm water bathe flush my
> ear out of wax. Ever since I have taken long hot showers starting off
> with a bathe into the ears to keep the wax low.
BATHE IN TO EARS, ARCHIE! BATHE INTO THE EARS POSTHASTE!
> Because of this bathing routine I have not had any ear wax buildup.
>
> Last night however, I have noticed a slight impairment and suspect
> wax buildup in my right ear. To solve it I will spend a good hour or
> more
> on warm water bathe into my ear until it becomes better.
I see, so, you now want to leave pee in your ear for a good hour or more.
Although I'd hardly call that a GOOD hour.
> [...]
>
> In particular to urine, human urine in detail, is that it is a great
> food for plants.
Arch, it's not a good for for ANYONE.
> Just as orange juice is designed perfectly for a
> human, and human urine designed perfectly for an orange tree
> plant to take in as food and nutrient. In Superdeterminism, these
> interrelationships mesh perfectly, as does a jigsaw puzzle, where
> its pieces have a purpose and fit perfectly into other pieces.
>
> Now, in the history of humanity, much of humanity did not have
> warm water readily available at most times to get rid of earwax
> buildup. Nor did many of our ancients realize that by flushing the
> ear with water would help to solve the buildup. I suppose many of
> our ancients just used a stick or something to get out the ear
> wax and many suffered ear injury in the process.
That was before pinky fingers were invented.
> Recently I saw a NOVA program on the Vikings and they found
> some hygiene device in a Viking Ireland dig. A silver type tool
> to clean out the ear. Sort of dangerous to use.
Arch, you could learn a lot more by watching "Late Night With Conan O'Brien".
While telling the monologue, he unconsciously jabs his right pinky into
his right ear and starts cleaning it out while he thinks people are
laughing at his joke, when really they're laughing at the fact that
he doesn't remember that most TV professionals don't pick their ears on TV.
So, you should tune in to learn how to pick your ear. Just don't pick it
on my TV.
> Earwax is designed, I believe to take care of itself in climates that
> are
> hot and warm. Not in northern climates such as Europe where earwax
> buildup needs special attention.
>
> Some stores carry a mild acidic solution to help cleanout ear wax
> buildup.
>
> I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax buildup? If so,
> I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine would solve their
> ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that discovery? If
> human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear wax, then it
> is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not Darwin
> evolution. This is an easy research test also. To see if human
> urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow specially
> formulated that it does the job well.
In the news today, a horrible tragedy happened when the King Of Science
discovered that his entire head dissolved in urine.
> And if so, are there any animals in the animal kingdom, especially
> apes or monkeys that are seen to be urinating in the ears of their
> members?
I wouldn't touch that straight line with my ten-foot member.
> I suppose our earlier humans did not live long after 20 years of age
> and so they may never have encountered ear wax buildup that would
> have hampered and endangered their life further. And that earwax
> buildup becomes a human problem only when humans began to live
> much longer than 20 years. And those who developed acute earwax
> buildup had a shortened life because of their handicap. Perhaps only
> when human civilization started do we begin to look for solutions to
> earwax buildup.
>
> Perhaps cold salt water also gets rid of earwax buildup and thus
> people were guided to swimming in salt water to solve their problem.
I can't wait to hear Archie's theory on how God created the Sony Walkman
to prevent airborne ear wax spores from drifting into our ears.
-- K.
Well, why ELSE could God
have created the Walkman?
jacqu...@my-deja.com
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Neville Lindsay
<jacqu...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8nkmi2$9ua$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> whence the saying: put a dick in your ear.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
I am afraid he is impervious to reason or derision - just doesn't hear
either. Now we know why.
As with the Martian mistakenly asking directions from a gas pump, on getting
no answer, his mate said 'tell him to take his prick out of his ear and he
might be able to hear you'.
NL
jacqu...@my-deja.com
enough, I will put it in a pissoon (you know what a spitoon is, don't
you? so you know what "pissoon" means), and I'll p... urinate on it and
see. Stand by for my report. And yes, it does take a genius (tm) like
Archie the Plutie not to test his "scientific" hypotheses first. Or have
you got prostate problems, Archie Plutie sweetie dearie?
Proudly recorded by DejaNews for pos(piss?)terity.
alan
friend to do some mutual dewaxing.
a.s.
<jacqu...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8nm3as$oe4$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Neville Lindsay
"alan" <ala...@dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tBEn5.330$NE3....@news.dircon.co.uk...
> I have tried to piss in my ear , but can't quite make it.
Strange, I thought everyone could.
NL
Archimedes Plutonium
> Following my wife's advice, I will be saving my ear wax. When I have
> enough, I will put it in a pissoon (you know what a spitoon is, don't
> you? so you know what "pissoon" means), and I'll p... urinate on it and
> see. Stand by for my report. And yes, it does take a genius (tm) like
> Archie the Plutie not to test his "scientific" hypotheses first. Or have
> you got prostate problems, Archie Plutie sweetie dearie?
>
> Proudly recorded by DejaNews for pos(piss?)terity.
>
Yes thanks, I hope you carry out one half of the program I stated
in the original post of this thread. I had two programs, one was to
study the chemistry of earwax and to see if the urine of the species
can dissolve or soften the ear wax. Hard to imagine our early
ancestors, very early ones, having availability to warm clean
water for irrigation of the ear, or having carbamide peroxide,
or hydrogen peroxide to help clean out the ear when they
did not even have chemistry in these prehistoric times. Perhaps
most died before ear wax built up to cause them hearing loss.
Perhaps most went and stuck a wood chip into their ear either
relieving themselves or damaging their ear.
One program is to see if the chemistry of urine dissolves or
softens the ear wax. Is human urine a better solvent for
human ear wax than is carbamide peroxide or hydrogen
peroxide? So the first program is to see if urine was
chemically designed to relieve ear wax buildup
Second program is to see whether animal behaviour, not just
in early humans but other animal species has a behavioural
tendency for members to urinate into the ears of other
members. Sci. ethology may have an answer to that. Do
animal species such as monkeys or apes have behaviour
of one member pissing into the ear of other members.
Most ethologists when they witness such behaviour would
not think that it is innate behaviour in order to clean out
the ear wax buildup but would mistakenly think that the
behaviour is some sort of dominance behaviour when in
fact it is behaviour of a highly purposeful and useful
means.
So, the two questions of research are these: (1)
is urine a natural solvent of a species ear wax? (2) do
animal species display a pissing into the ear behaviour?
A trained professional chemist could probably answer
question (1) without even doing the experiment testing
but we need both done.
angel...@my-deja.com
though, it has to be someone elses. :0)
Angela (seriously)
arc_pl...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions that would
quickly
> send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
>
> One, I am naturally curious. Second, I am a genius and needs to have
> my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see how a genius
> mind works. Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise me have
> never really bothered me much; what is worse than them are those
> that ignore.
>
> Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple questions often
> leads to major insights or discoveries.
>
> For the past 20 or 30 years of my life I have been very conscious
> of ear wax. I remember whilst at UC in my undergraduate days, in
winter
> time having to go to the UC medical to warm water bathe flush my
> ear out of wax. Ever since I have taken long hot showers starting off
> with a bathe into the ears to keep the wax low. Because of this
bathing
> routine I have not had any ear wax buildup.
>
> Last night however, I have noticed a slight impairment and suspect
> wax buildup in my right ear. To solve it I will spend a good hour or
> more
> on warm water bathe into my ear until it becomes better.
>
> Recently I have been wondering about the interrelationship of animal
> fertilizer for plants and the food that plants give animals. We note
the
>
> interrelationship of breathing gases of oxygen and carbon dioxide
> between
> plants to animals, it is as if plants were made for animals and
animals
> were
> made/designed for plants.
>
> I am searching for an exact mathematical number relationship of
> breathing gases between animals to plants. And another number
> relationship of food exchanged between animals to plants, in that
> animals live from plants and plants need animal fertilizer. These
> two exchanges: (1) breathing gases and (2) foods between animals
> and plants may have similar mathematics.
>
> In particular to urine, human urine in detail, is that it is a great
> food for plants. Just as orange juice is designed perfectly for a
> human, and human urine designed perfectly for an orange tree
> plant to take in as food and nutrient. In Superdeterminism, these
> interrelationships mesh perfectly, as does a jigsaw puzzle, where
> its pieces have a purpose and fit perfectly into other pieces.
>
> Now, in the history of humanity, much of humanity did not have
> warm water readily available at most times to get rid of earwax
> buildup. Nor did many of our ancients realize that by flushing the
> ear with water would help to solve the buildup. I suppose many of
> our ancients just used a stick or something to get out the ear
> wax and many suffered ear injury in the process.
>
> Recently I saw a NOVA program on the Vikings and they found
> some hygiene device in a Viking Ireland dig. A silver type tool
> to clean out the ear. Sort of dangerous to use.
>
> Earwax is designed, I believe to take care of itself in climates that
> are
> hot and warm. Not in northern climates such as Europe where earwax
> buildup needs special attention.
>
> Some stores carry a mild acidic solution to help cleanout ear wax
> buildup.
>
> I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax buildup? If so,
> I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine would solve their
> ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that discovery? If
> human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear wax, then it
> is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not Darwin
> evolution. This is an easy research test also. To see if human
> urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow specially
> formulated that it does the job well.
>
> And if so, are there any animals in the animal kingdom, especially
> apes or monkeys that are seen to be urinating in the ears of their
> members?
>
> I suppose our earlier humans did not live long after 20 years of age
> and so they may never have encountered ear wax buildup that would
> have hampered and endangered their life further. And that earwax
> buildup becomes a human problem only when humans began to live
> much longer than 20 years. And those who developed acute earwax
> buildup had a shortened life because of their handicap. Perhaps only
> when human civilization started do we begin to look for solutions to
> earwax buildup.
>
> Perhaps cold salt water also gets rid of earwax buildup and thus
> people were guided to swimming in salt water to solve their problem.
>
>
Neville Lindsay
<angel...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8nq4kb$mu$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> Urine is actually good for an ear infection. It can't be your own urine
> though, it has to be someone elses. :0)
>
> Angela (seriously)
Peace on you.
NL
alan
warm, ear, syringe, oil. Not so hot to do damage. There are some proprietary
things using olive oil and chlorobenzene which is probably better as it is a
damn powerful solvent, but stay with the pharmaceutical grade!
alan
Neville Lindsay <nev...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:9k2o5.6902$Xg.6...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
jacqu...@my-deja.com
jacqu...@my-deja.com
urine
> though, it has to be someone elses. :0)
Piss (pardon my French, mam'zelle) is good for any infection, AND your
very own is as good as anyone else's. But Archie the Plutie's point was
not about that: it was about p... urine being a good solvent for
ear-wax. Now, it DOES take a genius like Archie the Plutie to theorize
without bothering to test his theories. Or is he fishing for a grant? I
suggest further:
1. Is piss a good brain-solvent?
2. Is the outer ear connected to the inner ear connected to the corpus
callosum? (I'll leave the connection to the knee-bone for another
research grant -- a connection outer-ear-brain would go a long way to
explaining .... ).
Roman A Kresinski
Plutonium <plut...@willinet.net> wrote:
> Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions
> that would quickly
> send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I
> post them?
Yesterday I read The Internet all the way through and I have
to admit I laughed at some of your posts. So, tell me, why
do you post these posts?
> One, I am naturally curious.
I see. Understated, as usual. Others would put it more
strongly.
> Second, I am a genius and
> needs to have
> my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see
> how a genius
> mind works. Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise
> me have
> never really bothered me much; what is worse than them
> are those
> that ignore.
Is it because you're a genius that you don't realise that
you've just insulted the whole of the readership of The
Internet and that we're going to ignore you and are not
going to read you any more? Before I go, can you tell me
whether you resent non-humans - say monkeys and higher
primates - laughing? Or do they just ignore you?
> Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple
> questions often
> leads to major insights or discoveries.
> For the past 20 or 30 years of my life I have been
> very conscious
> of ear wax.
If you think you have an ear wax problem, then you probably
don't, and we should all have ignored this post instead of
getting all upset about it. On the other hand, ear wax does
cause neurological problems.
> I remember
So far so good.
> whilst at UC in my
> undergraduate days, in winter
> time having to go to the UC medical to warm water
> bathe flush my
> ear out of wax.
Most people flush wax out of their ear. I guess you do have
a problem after all.
> Ever since I have taken long hot
> showers starting off
> with a bathe into the ears to keep the wax low.
> Because of this bathing
> routine I have not had any ear wax buildup.
Perhaps because your ears were also low and you looked in
the wrong place?
[...]
> Recently I have been wondering about the
> interrelationship of animal
> fertilizer for plants and the food that plants give
> animals. We note the
> interrelationship of breathing gases of oxygen and
> carbon dioxide
> between
> plants to animals, it is as if plants were made for
> animals and animals
> were
> made/designed for plants.
You and Kibo. Kibo and you. Everybody benefits.
> I am searching for an exact mathematical number
> relationship of
> breathing gases between animals to plants. And another
> number
> relationship of food exchanged between animals to
> plants, in that
> animals live from plants and plants need animal
> fertilizer.
[...]
> I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax
> buildup? If so,
> I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine
> would solve their
> ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that
> discovery?
Indeed. Aerocephalus Tyrranicus, you have once again come
unerringly to the crux of the matter in a few quick pages.
Perhaps Superdeterminism (and not Darwin Evolution) is the
reason that so few of the ancient texts and pharmacopeias
mention this cure. History and earwax were waiting for a
genius to make us all laugh on the Internet.
> If human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear
> wax, then it
> is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not
> Darwin
> evolution.
THAT'S WHAT I JUST SAID!!
> This is an easy research test also. To see
> if human
> urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow
> specially
> formulated that it does the job well.
> And if so, are there any animals in the animal
> kingdom, especially
> apes or monkeys that are seen to be urinating in the
> ears of their
> members?
So they do ignore you. Don't feel bad. I imagine that it
goes something like this;
- First Monkey; Ooooohh Aaaahhh Aaaahhh! (There you are.)
- Second Monkey; AAAAAAAAAA! (I say! Didn't you
just urinate in my ear?!)
- First Monkey; Phththphphpppp!
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! (It's
Superdeterminism. That'll be ten dollars.)
- Second Monkey; AAAaaaaeeeeee! (Now look. If you do that
again I shall call the police, who shall certainly escort
you off campus.)
WAIT! Now I see. You should know that normal monkeys don't
have ears on their members. If this is the sort of earwax
problem you have been suffering from, I'll guess you don't
need to worry about neurological problems as much. Well,
maybe not quite as much.
> I suppose our earlier humans did not live long after
> 20 years of age
> and so they may never have encountered ear wax buildup
> that would
> have hampered and endangered their life further.
[...]
Aaah. Now I know what kind of ears you mean, your post
makes perfect sense. You can only get so dead before you
notice, I agree.
> Perhaps cold salt water also gets rid of earwax
> buildup and thus
> people were guided to swimming in salt water to solve
> their problem.
Quite the contrary. If you notice, the hair on our bodies
is aligned such as to prove that we evolved from fish with
hairy (or bald, in some cases) heads. Therefore, the
driving force of human evolution was the need for lungs so
we could survive on land and remove earwax with urine,
rather than the inferior cold salt water, or we might all
die, with disasterous effects on evolution.
Archie, it's been a while since I've enjoyed a post as much
as yours. My mood has changed completely, I'm no longer
offended, and an apology is not necessary. I hope your
research is fruitful and I look forward to reading about it.
Now you mention it, I wonder if there is anything else that
might remove ear wax?
* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful
lance
I picked up the copy of the Field Survival Guide that was given to him and
leafed through it...
One section stated that human urine was sterile and therefore acceptable to
use in the field to irrigate and clean out wounds... No mention of earwax
removal though...
"Roman A Kresinski" <r.kresins...@kingston.ac.uk.invalid> wrote in
message news:0c60a140...@usw-ex0108-061.remarq.com...
Marvin Margoshes
"lance" <plancer...@mapson.hot.mail.com> wrote in message
news:sr07vrf...@corp.supernews.com...
> I had a roommate that went into the Army, after he came back from boot
camp
> I picked up the copy of the Field Survival Guide that was given to him and
> leafed through it...
>
> One section stated that human urine was sterile and therefore acceptable
to
> use in the field to irrigate and clean out wounds... No mention of earwax
> removal though...
>
>
urine is sterile. Not all doctor's use the same criterion, but bacterial
levels in urine are considered indicative of a urinary tract infection only
above some thousands per ml.
Using your own urine to rinse out a wound is probably better than using
ditch water. The bacteria in your urine are already in your body.
David Welsh
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions that would quickly
> send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
>
> [snip]
> Now, in the history of humanity, much of humanity did not have
> warm water readily available at most times to get rid of earwax
> buildup. Nor did many of our ancients realize that by flushing the
> ear with water would help to solve the buildup. I suppose many of
> our ancients just used a stick or something to get out the ear
> wax and many suffered ear injury in the process.
>
> Recently I saw a NOVA program on the Vikings and they found
> some hygiene device in a Viking Ireland dig. A silver type tool
> to clean out the ear. Sort of dangerous to use.
>
> Earwax is designed, I believe to take care of itself in climates that
> are
> hot and warm. Not in northern climates such as Europe where earwax
> buildup needs special attention.
>
> Some stores carry a mild acidic solution to help cleanout ear wax
> buildup.
>
> I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax buildup? If so,
> I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine would solve their
> ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that discovery? If
> human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear wax, then it
> is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not Darwin
> evolution. This is an easy research test also. To see if human
> urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow specially
> formulated that it does the job well.
[snip]
I would suggest that you conduct an experiment. Invite all your friends
and acquaintances to urinate in your ears, record the results and
publish a paper. Should be fascinating reading.
--
Dave Welsh
dave...@earthlink.net
Anthony Tarr
"Birmingham Gremlin" <gre...@legend.kirenet.com> wrote in message
news:slrn8qvei2....@legend.kirenet.com...
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2000 05:40:07 -0700, Roman A Kresinski wrote:
> >In article <399D8C10...@willinet.net>, Archimedes
> >Plutonium <plut...@willinet.net> wrote:
> > Now you mention it, I wonder if there is anything else that
> >might remove ear wax?
>
>
> --
> Birmingham Gremlin
What about molten lead? Ask Hamlet's dad.
--
Anthony Tarr - retired scientist
mutt'n'tomatoe
Sterile or not, at least be sure to blot it dry with a clean Kim-wipe
afterward, just to be on the safe side (one square of toilet paper will
also do the trick). BTW this toilet paper treatment also might be a
good way to keep babies ear canals halfway-dry after their baths; bath
towels and washcloths are just too thick to work (but do it gently by
capillary action, and NOT probing and poking and rubbing). The ends
and corners of the kimwipe are likely to be dirtier than the middle, so
crumple-up a portion of the middle (avoiding fingerprints) and gently
apply for a moment. Repeat once if necessary.
Utilizing urine as a solvent here would be a gross misapplication of
the “Like dissolves like” model that was in vogue some time back
(correct me where im wrong). Just because the earwax sometimes turns
yellow – if it darkens further, then what? This substance is there for
a reason (partly protective coating, partly excretion product, and as
an added bonus it blocks out those oft-bothersome incoming 20-20,000 Hz
soundwaves) so don’t remove every last decigram of it. From the
physics vantagepoint one would think mechanical removal might be more
appealing than chemical treatment. There was an example on educational
tv about monkeys that used sticks as tools. It seems like someone once
mentioned here (Uncle Al?) some sort of special stick of a tree with
very hard wood, used for making clarinets, one end of which might be
honed into a miniature flattened spoon-shaped scoop for the purpose of
mechanical removal of earwax. The crust that naturally forms should
only need a little encouraging to slough off in an outward direction.
Try to preserve the integrity of the eardrum and other functioning
structural features.
A better solvent than urine would be biodiesel esters or their
equivalent, but use the USP-grade esters, not the stuff meeting ASTM
specs. Mineral oil or the previously mentioned olive oil, too.
Ethanol might work synergisticly with these as a diluted co-solvent,
just don’t use the high-strength fuel-grade ethanol for something this
close to the brain cortex.
In the ancient Pictic linen industry, both
leather tanning
amphibian millieau
when times are tough, urine is seen in a different light
waterproofing
R. Keith Andrews
of those around them. Perhaps it is time to recall, if it were not for the
absurd ideas of some people, the human race would still be living in caves
and grunting at each other.
Is it not possible that Archimedes Plutonium is onto something that
heretofore has not been addressed?
Just something to think about.
Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message <399D8C10...@willinet.net>...
>Quite a number of my posts to Internet are questions that would quickly
>send a rush of laughter to its readers. So why do I post them?
>
>One, I am naturally curious. Second, I am a genius and needs to have
>my thoughts recorded to the future generations to see how a genius
>mind works. Third, humans who laugh, mock or despise me have
>never really bothered me much; what is worse than them are those
>that ignore.
>
>Fourth, in a world of Superdeterminism, asking simple questions often
>leads to major insights or discoveries.
>
>For the past 20 or 30 years of my life I have been very conscious
>of ear wax. I remember whilst at UC in my undergraduate days, in winter
>time having to go to the UC medical to warm water bathe flush my
>ear out of wax. Ever since I have taken long hot showers starting off
>with a bathe into the ears to keep the wax low. Because of this bathing
>routine I have not had any ear wax buildup.
>
>Last night however, I have noticed a slight impairment and suspect
>wax buildup in my right ear. To solve it I will spend a good hour or
>more
>on warm water bathe into my ear until it becomes better.
>
>Recently I have been wondering about the interrelationship of animal
>fertilizer for plants and the food that plants give animals. We note the
>
>interrelationship of breathing gases of oxygen and carbon dioxide
>between
>plants to animals, it is as if plants were made for animals and animals
>were
>made/designed for plants.
>
>I am searching for an exact mathematical number relationship of
>breathing gases between animals to plants. And another number
>relationship of food exchanged between animals to plants, in that
>animals live from plants and plants need animal fertilizer. These
>two exchanges: (1) breathing gases and (2) foods between animals
>and plants may have similar mathematics.
>
>In particular to urine, human urine in detail, is that it is a great
>food for plants. Just as orange juice is designed perfectly for a
>human, and human urine designed perfectly for an orange tree
>plant to take in as food and nutrient. In Superdeterminism, these
>interrelationships mesh perfectly, as does a jigsaw puzzle, where
>its pieces have a purpose and fit perfectly into other pieces.
>
>Now, in the history of humanity, much of humanity did not have
>warm water readily available at most times to get rid of earwax
>buildup. Nor did many of our ancients realize that by flushing the
>ear with water would help to solve the buildup. I suppose many of
>our ancients just used a stick or something to get out the ear
>wax and many suffered ear injury in the process.
>
>Recently I saw a NOVA program on the Vikings and they found
>some hygiene device in a Viking Ireland dig. A silver type tool
>to clean out the ear. Sort of dangerous to use.
>
>Earwax is designed, I believe to take care of itself in climates that
>are
>hot and warm. Not in northern climates such as Europe where earwax
>buildup needs special attention.
>
>Some stores carry a mild acidic solution to help cleanout ear wax
>buildup.
>
>I wonder if human urine is a good solution for ear wax buildup? If so,
>I wonder if any of our ancients realized that urine would solve their
>ear wax buildup? Or how they would come upon that discovery? If
>human urine is a perfect solution for dissolving ear wax, then it
>is another example of Superdeterminism at work and not Darwin
>evolution. This is an easy research test also. To see if human
>urine dissolves human ear wax and if it is somehow specially
>formulated that it does the job well.
>
>And if so, are there any animals in the animal kingdom, especially
>apes or monkeys that are seen to be urinating in the ears of their
>members?
>
>I suppose our earlier humans did not live long after 20 years of age
>and so they may never have encountered ear wax buildup that would
>have hampered and endangered their life further. And that earwax
>buildup becomes a human problem only when humans began to live
>much longer than 20 years. And those who developed acute earwax
>buildup had a shortened life because of their handicap. Perhaps only
>when human civilization started do we begin to look for solutions to
>earwax buildup.
>
Jacques Guy
> It is truly amazing at the number of people that laugh at the strange ideas
> of those around them. Perhaps it is time to recall, if it were not for the
> absurd ideas of some people, the human race would still be living in caves
> and grunting at each other.
> Is it not possible that Archimedes Plutonium is onto something that
> heretofore has not been addressed?
Perhaps he ought first to gather a bit of earwax, piss on it, and
see. That is called the experimental method, and, in this particular
instance, the experiment does not seem to call for particularly
intricate or expensive equipment. And again, perhaps I have been
mistaken all along: the "sci" in these newsgroups does not stand
for "science" but for some obscure, but very serious, condition of
the urinary tract.
Tom Francis
> >I wonder if human urine is a good
> >solution for ear wax buildup?
Dunno.
Works on athlete's foot fungus though.
Maybe it would work on ear fungus.
Assuming that you have ear fungus that is.
Lori
My mother knows a woman who puts baby urine on her face to keep away
wrinkles.
It's a sick, sad world.
--
Lori
Tom Francis
"Lori" <80s_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3a5db2fd...@news.cis.dfn.de...
Well, the athlete's foot thing is true - and it works.
Can't speak to wrinkle care - thought Oily 'de Oily
was used for that. :>)
Mortis
<3a5db2fd...@news.cis.dfn.de>, wherein 80s_...@my-deja.com
At least urine is sterile, unlike some other bodily excretions.
Mortis
Master of the Unknown, KPS
Nebulosis Defunctus
"This sentence is false."
-Evil Spock
Arthur Levesque
Portugeuse women was the best, for some unknown reason.
--
/\ Arthur M Levesque 2A4W <*> b...@boog.orgy =/\= http://boog.org __
\B\ack King of the Potato People <fnord> "Ia! Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!" (oO)
\S\lash Member of a vast right-wing conspiracy (-O-) Urban Spaceman /||\
\/ I was a lesbian before it was fashionable "I hate rainbows!"-EC
Tara Kostezky
news:93kda3$hko$2...@bob.news.rcn.net...
> The Romans used urine as mouthwash. They thought that urine from
> Portugeuse women was the best, for some unknown reason.
If you're lost in the bush and get injured - say, for instance, a crocodile
should attack you - or maybe a rampaging film crew from "Survivor" - happens
all the time in Australia, honest - and you don't have any other antiseptic,
bathing the wound in urine makes a good substitute.
TK
--
Whether my dreams come true depends on whether a major city is
completely flooded and people build roads between skyscrapers and mutant
alligators attack and special anti-alligator police forces are formed -
Mortis
WWS
Arthur Levesque wrote:
>
> The Romans used urine as mouthwash. They thought that urine from
> Portugeuse women was the best, for some unknown reason.
I heard that people with Diabetes have a lot of sugar in their urine.
--
_________________________________________________WWS_____________
lann...@my-deja.com
like dissolves like. For cleaning out that earwax plug, you want about
5 cc of toe jam.
--
*********************************************
Money talks and bullshit walks.
WWS
Tara Kostezky wrote:
>
> "Arthur Levesque" <b...@boog.orgy> wrote in message
> news:93kda3$hko$2...@bob.news.rcn.net...
> > The Romans used urine as mouthwash. They thought that urine from
> > Portugeuse women was the best, for some unknown reason.
>
> If you're lost in the bush and get injured - say, for instance, a crocodile
> should attack you - or maybe a rampaging film crew from "Survivor" - happens
> all the time in Australia, honest - and you don't have any other antiseptic,
> bathing the wound in urine makes a good substitute.
Now you made me remember something that happened years and years ago.
We've got a local plant here called "bull nettles" - it's related to
the different kinds of nettles that grow around the world. It gets
about 2 feet high in fields in the summer, looks pretty inoffensive,
big green leaves. If you look close, those leaves look like they're
covered with fine hairs. The shock comes if you touch it - every one
of those hairs feels like it injects acid straight into your skin!
It will even burn your leg straight through a pair of jeans if you
brush against it accidentally. If you want to be particularly mean,
you can ask someone to try and pick one of the white flowers - their
hand will be on fire the rest of the day!
Interestingly, the chemical agent found in them is best neutralized
by ammonia - just like with some jellyfish. And of course, the most
handy source of ammonia around in a pinch is urine. So where is this
going? Many years ago, some friends and I were dirt bike riding through
the countryside in the summer. We probably should have worn protective
gear, but heck, it was hot, we never wore more than cutoffs and a T-shirt.
There were a bunch of bike trails back through some acreage that no
one ever seemed to bother with. There were about 5 of us that day, I
think; all of a sudden we heard one of the guys (I think it was Chappee)
scream - he hit a log and flipped. Well this would have been bad enough,
since he was kinda banged up anyway, but after he flipped he rolled
through a giant clump of bull nettles! He was in agony, burning all
over. And we were miles and miles away from anyone else - what were
we to do?
The only thing his good friends could do - and even he agreed it was the
only way. We unzipped and gave him some relief!
And that's what friends are for.
--
_________________________________________________WWS_____________
"You find out who your friends are when you've got two broken
arms and you walk into a men's room." - Lyle Alzedo
Arthur Levesque
Arthur>Portugeuse women was the best, for some unknown reason.
WWS>I heard that people with Diabetes have a lot of sugar in their urine.
<Cartman>
My mom says there are a lot of black people in a diabetic's urine.
</Cartman>
Michael Press
<to...@neca.com> wrote:
Urea is the active ingredient of choice for skin emollients.
You need not take my word for it, ask a pharmacist or two.
A product available in the USA is Aqua Care, 10% urea.
Whenever my hands get torn up working with
portland cement or garden dirt this stuff does the job,
and no other product ever has.
I have read that the Inuits used urine to soften hides
preparatory to making them into garments.
--
Michael Press
jaso...@my-deja.com
Jason
Floyd Davidson
>> > "Tom Francis" <to...@neca.com> wrote:
>> > >> arc_pl...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> >I wonder if human urine is a good
>> > >> >solution for ear wax buildup?
>> > >Works on athlete's foot fungus though.
>Urea is the active ingredient of choice for skin emollients.
>You need not take my word for it, ask a pharmacist or two.
>A product available in the USA is Aqua Care, 10% urea.
>Whenever my hands get torn up working with
>portland cement or garden dirt this stuff does the job,
>and no other product ever has.
>
>I have read that the Inuits used urine to soften hides
>preparatory to making them into garments.
That is essentially correct. Note that urine is used to "cure"
the hides, as opposed to "tan" the hides. The difference is in
what kind of chemical reaction happens, and the practical effect
is that cured hides are much more likely to rot than tanned
hides.
However, there are other practical considerations. "Piss cured"
fur used to be pretty commonly used, especially for foot wear
such as slippers. That is fine if you live in an environment
that is, ahhhh... rich in a variety of pungent smells. Most
traditional Eskimo and Indian homes here in Alaska would have
fit that description a few years back, when virtually all
clothing was homemade from furs and the typical home would have
been filled with a variety of furs in various stages of the
process of being either tanned or cured. Not to mention that
modern sewage systems, running water, electricity and convenient
refrigeration were not available, each of which added another
set of not so sweet aromas.
What I'm saying is such a home might not smell like a bed of
roses. And piss cured slippers would not detract from the
local atmosphere.
But... just put a pair of them on someone like yours truly (my
feet sweat) in a modern home, and let those slippers ferment a
little! It tends to convince most people they do not really
want to wear those beautiful slippers ever again.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.ptialaska.net/~floyd>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) fl...@barrow.com
Archimedes Plutonium
Ryan Doherty wrote:
> Uncle Al (24.16.181.181),
>
> I am consider this message of yours SPAM, so please keep your childish
> postings to yourself!
>
> By the way, Grow up.. you are wasting more bandwidth with your repeated
> responces that Archimedes and his questions!
>
> Ryan
>
Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to Uncle Al. He and his
motley crew of cohorts have stalked me for years. In fact they have stalked
me nonstop for 7 years now.
Uncle Al feels he is a police cop of sci.chem and sci.physics and wants to
chase out any poster he does not like. Many chemistry professors have put
Al Schwartz into their killfile. That is about the only real solution.
Some say Al Schwartz is a failed chemistry professor of 80s in age living
in Tallahassee Florida or Denton Texas. He is old, cranky with nothing to
do but post to the Internet. He feels a righteous duty to stalk me. No
matter if I post pure chemistry to sci. chem or pure physics to
sci.physics, Uncle Al feels that none of my posts belongs to those
newsgroups.
He has set himself up as a self righteous self imposed police cop of
sci.chem.
Many other people have complained about Uncle Al in sci. chem.
SOLUTION: the only solution that I can see is to killfile Uncle Al and all
Al supporters. And to add sci.chem and sci.physics to all of your posts to
the Internet. Let Uncle Al stalk you everywhere, not just sci. chem or sci
physics. Make it so that everyday Uncle Al wakes up, his chores and work
are to stalk people on the Internet. Make it such that the essence of life
for Uncle Al will now be to stalk 1 or 3 or 20 or 117 people every day.
So, I am asking of all those people on the Internet who have been attacked
by Uncle Al, to give Uncle Al what he craves. Add sci.chem and sci.physics
to all of your Internet posts. And killfile Uncle Al.
Uncle Al is already a crackpot and is insane, but drive him wildly insane.
Force him to waste minutes and hours every day of his life stalking you.
And you just sit back and laugh at how the idiot Uncle Al is making himself
a monkey idiot.
Last year someone emailed me saying that sci.chem was back to normal and
that Uncle Al had been put under sedation and it was safe to post to
sci.chem again. Sci.chem was flooded by outsiders because Uncle Al had
pissed them off.
Well, that is not the way to handle the self imposed sci.chem police dog of
Uncle Al. The way to handle Uncle Al and other stalkers like him is to
"killfile them" and then force them to stalk you all over the Internet. Let
everyone see what a fool he is, not just sci.chem folk.
I wish that someone is archiving all of the Uncle Al stalks of Archimedes
Plutonium.
I have him killfiled and so I have zero. But I would imagine that Uncle Al
has about 500 posts per year of attacks.
So, I ask everyone who knows Uncle Al, to add sci. chem to their Internet
posts and to killfile Uncle Al. Let the fool make himself a larger fool.
And it takes little energy for me or for you to add "sci.chem" but think of
how much energy and how much rage it gives Uncle Al. Why, I just burst out
into laughter at all the energy spent by Uncle Al in stalking this and
other posts of mine. Uncle Al is too stupid to realize he has been defeated
and that the world laughs at his cop enforcement. That method (if they have
a newsgroup hangout) will deal with all stalkers of the Internet, not just
Uncle Al.
Chip Anderson
<3A6128B1...@willinet.net>:
>
>
>Ryan Doherty wrote:
>
>> Uncle Al (24.16.181.181),
>>
>> I am consider this message of yours SPAM, so please keep your childish
>> postings to yourself!
>>
>> By the way, Grow up.. you are wasting more bandwidth with your
>> repeated responces that Archimedes and his questions!
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>
>Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to Uncle Al. He and
>his motley crew of cohorts have stalked me for years. In fact they have
>stalked me nonstop for 7 years now.
>
--snip--
Dear Mr. Plutonium,
After reviewing several of your previous postings, I can see where Uncle Al
would have cause for criticism. I also think that Uncle Al can be bit
heavy-handed. However, I think I'll have to side with Uncle Al on this
one. Flights of fancy masquerading as science tend to irritate me too.
--
Chip
http://www.tangledweb.dnsq.org
And all who heard should see them there,
And all should cry, Beware! Beware!
His flashing eyes, his floating hair!
Weave a circle round him thrice,
And close your eyes with holy dread,
For he on honey-dew hath fed.
"Kubla Khan" by Samuel Taylor Coleridge
muteant toma80e
interest. As you might be awear, this has nothing to do with sci.chem
or sci.physics and would be more in the relmm of Ear, nose and
throat but nevertheless…
As was written in this thread back in September, I would urge you to
reconsider your “let bathwater soak into the ears” formula for dealing
with access earwax. Wax, by its very definition, is not going to
dissolve in water. True, using warm water may increase the dissolving
power a little bit, but the water would really have to go up to boiling
temperatures to do any real work. There may be other reasons for
spending leisure time in tubb, or for urining in someones ear, but
melting out ear wax is not one of them.
Furthermore, in my opinion, this is only aggravating the problem.
Correct me if im wrong, but after one allows water to go inside their
skull via the ear opening, the body’s defense mechanism build up some
response to this. Think of it as ‘water-proofing the brain' for
YODGwylion. The wax buildup is the bodys way of trying to block the
water from getting into the brain and causing some real damage under
whatever conditions may be encountered. Some other means should be
tried.
M.T.P. VI
p.s. Otzi’s ouioui was frozen stiff and unfortunately detached in the
initial excavitation, so we’ll never no if Alpanians of yore practiced
this type of preverse ritualistic powertrip.
>
> > In article <399D8C10...@willinet.net>,
> > arc_pl...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > >I wonder if human urine is a good
> > >solution for ear wax buildup?
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Jim Carr
... snip bizarre cross-post to sci.archaeology ...
In article <3A6128B1...@willinet.net>
arc_pl...@hotmail.com writes:
>
>Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to Uncle Al. He and
>his motley crew of cohorts have stalked me for years.
Uncle Al followed you to sci.archaeology?
>In fact they have stalked me nonstop for 7 years now.
If you don't want him to read your articles on archaeology,
don't cross-post them to sci.chem.
--
James Carr <j...@scri.fsu.edu> http://www.scri.fsu.edu/~jac/
"The half of knowledge is knowing where to find knowledge" - Anon.
Motto over the entrance to Dodd Hall, former library at FSCW.
muteant toma80e
> >
> >I have read that the Inuits used urine to soften hides
> >preparatory to making them into garments.
>
> That is essentially correct. Note that urine is used to "cure"
> the hides, as opposed to "tan" the hides. The difference is in
> what kind of chemical reaction happens, and the practical effect
> is that cured hides are much more likely to rot than tanned
> hides.
>
> However, there are other practical considerations. "Piss cured"
> fur used to be pretty commonly used, especially for foot wear
> such as slippers. That is fine if you live in an environment
> that is, ahhhh... rich in a variety of pungent smells. Most
> traditional Eskimo and Indian homes here in Alaska would have
> fit that description a few years back, when virtually all
> clothing was homemade from furs and the typical home would have
> been filled with a variety of furs in various stages of the
The photos at your website demonstrate the difficulties of that pretty
clearly, you can't just hang it out on the clothesline to dry.
http://www.ptialaska.net/~floyd/brrw/brrw08.html
(BTW, those spring swans on Alaska's North Slope were quite a sight. I
always wondered what it looked like up there, thanks for the
perspective.)
In article <877l409...@barrow.com>,