gold foil plates exhibit temperature-independent paramagnetism

[Timothy Sutter]

=
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i4/e047201

Measurement of a Pauli and Orbital Paramagnetic
State in Bulk Gold Using X-Ray Magnetic
Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

We show that bulk gold (Au) exhibits temperature-independent
paramagnetism in an external magnetic field by x-ray magnetic
circular dichroism spectroscopy at the Au L2 and L3 edges.
Using the sum-rule analysis, we obtained a magnetic moment
of 1.3�10-4??�B/atom in an external magnetic field of 10 T
and a paramagnetic susceptibility of 8.9�10-6 for the 5d orbit.
The induced paramagnetism in bulk Au is characterized by a large
(�30%) orbital contribution. This orbital component was retained
even when Au atoms formed nanoparticles, playing an important
role in stabilizing the spontaneous spin polarization
in the Au nanoparticles.
=

trouble is, one really doesn't have such an effect to posit

as i've mentioned before, you -can-

have an ultra-trace paramagnetism

in gold foil


what this means is;

ok, gold, on paper [in theory], is diamagnetic,

meaning it has no unpaired electrons


but, under an extreme vacuum it is noted that gold foil plates

are attracted to each other when a current is applied, and

this is anomalous behavior for gold foil as it is a
behavior associated with unpaired electroms,

i.e. "paramagnetism"


and so, the bright people suggest that empty space
itself is supplying the paramagnetic behavior because,
after all, gold is diamagnetic.

trouble is, there is no such thing as 100% pure gold and
uncertainty suggests that we cannot know precisely where
and when the little electrons are anyway, even in "pure"
gold foil and so, the more mundane explanantion is not
that empty space is behaving paramagnetically, but
that the gold foil is behaving paramagnetically,

and how can we say this?

BECAUSE, the plates are attracted to each other

which is the behavior of parmagnetic unpaired electrons.

in other words, there is no "kashmir effect" in the first place,

much less some behavior that spits out universes from non-space

[Timothy Sutter]

> =
> http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i4/e047201

> Measurement of a Pauli and Orbital Paramagnetic
> State in Bulk Gold Using X-Ray Magnetic
> Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

> We show that bulk gold (Au) exhibits temperature-independent
> paramagnetism in an external magnetic field by x-ray magnetic
> circular dichroism spectroscopy at the Au L2 and L3 edges.
> Using the sum-rule analysis, we obtained a magnetic moment
> of 1.3�10-4??�B/atom in an external magnetic field of 10 T
> and a paramagnetic susceptibility of 8.9�10-6 for the 5d orbit.
> The induced paramagnetism in bulk Au is characterized by a large
> (�30%) orbital contribution. This orbital component was retained
> even when Au atoms formed nanoparticles, playing an important
> role in stabilizing the spontaneous spin polarization
> in the Au nanoparticles.
> =

> trouble is, one really doesn't have such an effect to posit
> as i've mentioned before, you -can-
> have an ultra-trace paramagnetism
> in gold foil

there is no experiment that may be carried out

which simulates a lack of space.

'we' can set up a near vacuum and

do experiments in a near vacuum, but,

'we' cannot simulate a lack of space

which is an evasive datum for some proposed

initial conditions of a universal establishment from 'no-thing'.

many statements concerning such an initial condition

have no epxerimental backing and so, suggesting

that objects pop in and out of existence in the absence of space

is metaphysical conjecture.

fine, got no problem with metaphysical conjecture...


and then, 'in the beginning'


looks like we still have a 'beginning' to this stuff,

time space and matter,


but what we don't have is some clear idea

of how objects appear in the -absence- of space...


it must be something else...




this is a serious flaw in the 'god-less mythology'

a phenomenon associated with space is cited as

the phenomenon which would bring space in to existence.

so, it's a hocus pocus hand waving exercise.




in other words, if you have no space

you have no phenomenon which would tend to 'invent' space.

the 'god-less mythology' is not self consistent.


see, it is said that quantum particles fluctuate

in and out of some spongy quality of space


and then it is said that this same fluctuating property

is responible for the invention of the material universe,

from not being, in the absence of the space in which this

fluctuating property is said to operate.





it has been said by proponents of the 'god-less mythology'

that time is stilled at precisely 'the beginning'


fine, i have no problem with that,

time as measured by cesium clocks and the like

cannot be present wihere no cesium clocks can exist.

but, this absence of physicasl time, removes all particle motion


and so, once again, we are in a frozen trap


in the instance where no space no time

and no matter are said to exist,

there are no physical phenomena which could be

cited as a 'trigger' to there happening.


a conscious 'finger' is still best cited as the 'trigger'





i just don't say; "something from =nothing="


i say; "something from something else"


we may very well no have physical time space and matter

at precisely Time t = 0


but we do have "something else"


etc.





an actionable consciousness forms the basis

for a self consistent understanding.


i'll stick with it

revise and resubmit...


the 'god-less myrthology' fails...



the 'accidental universe' simply never happens, never becomes,

but, we are here, and so, the =conditions= cited by

proponents of the accidental universe

cannot be the conditions associated with

=reality=


there is no experiment that may be carried out

which simulates a lack of space.

'we' can set up a near vacuum and

do experiments in a near vacuum, but,

'we' cannot simulate a lack of space

which is an evasive datum for some proposed

initial conditions.

many statements concerning such an initial condition

have no epxerimental backing and so, suggesting

that objects pop in and out of existence in the absence of space

is metaphysical conjecture.

fine, got no problem with metaphysical conjecture...


and then, 'in the beginning'


looks like we still have a 'beginning' to this stuff,

time space and matter,


but what we don't have is some clear idea

of how objects appear in the -absence- of space...


it must be something else...







but it is hasty pudding to speak of

'quantum fluctuations' in the -absence- of space.

this you don't got

not even an inkling of a reminder...


and then you're back telling me there

has always been "something"

and that this "something" is -physical-

which is not "something from nothing" and is

inconsistent with previous statements.

revise and resubmit...

[Timothy Sutter]

> > =
> > http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i4/e047201
>
> > Measurement of a Pauli and Orbital Paramagnetic
> > State in Bulk Gold Using X-Ray Magnetic
> > Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
>
> > We show that bulk gold (Au) exhibits temperature-independent
> > paramagnetism in an external magnetic field by x-ray magnetic
> > circular dichroism spectroscopy at the Au L2 and L3 edges.
> > Using the sum-rule analysis, we obtained a magnetic moment
> > of 1.3�10-4??�B/atom in an external magnetic field of 10 T
> > and a paramagnetic susceptibility of 8.9�10-6 for the 5d orbit.
> > The induced paramagnetism in bulk Au is characterized by a large
> > (�30%) orbital contribution. This orbital component was retained
> > even when Au atoms formed nanoparticles, playing an important
> > role in stabilizing the spontaneous spin polarization
> > in the Au nanoparticles.
> > =

see, there's a /detector/ present in the vacuum,

and that /detector/ itself, is accountable for the

trace energies that must be 'tared'

from any subsequent measurement,

and so, the energy of the /detector/

is the "zero" for the evacuated system.


very much as if you went to a little balance
to weigh out a sample of salt, and you brought
a little plastic dish with you and you weighed
the dish all by itself first,

and then weighed out the dish and the salt,
and subtracted the weight of the dish,
or the 'tare' weight.

the weight of the dish all by itself
becomes your "zero" weight.

of course now, there are the little balances
that have a button on it called the "tare" button,

and you place your little plastic dish on the
balance and press "tare" and the reading shows a 'zero'


that's sort of how the /detector/ is behaving

in the evacuated system.

like the dish on the balance...



and so, if you really do wanna measure some aspect
of the energetics os a system in an evacuated environment,

you have to take into account, any energies generated
by the /detector/ itself, and subtract that off,

and that energy, of the /detector/ is your "zero"


it doesn't mean that there is some

mystical energy content to evacuated space...



whether there is or not,

is not substantiated by -that-


but then, "energy" is a nebulous term

in certain respects...


cuz basically, the only big E energy you
know of is married to little m matter,

and so, if there is "something else"
which is not 'matter' then you may not
be able to describe any accompanying
phenomenon as "energy"

and 'it' may be truly "something else"

which is neither matter nor energy but may
be the precursor formulation -for- that
set of phenomenons


and that's where our "conscious initiator" springs to -action-


no accident at all...



so, it's not at all odd that,

in this sort of situation,

the /detector/ detects itself.



but that when you're down there, practically,

"in the noise" of =minute= energy systems

the enrgies you are attempting to study do not

overwhelm the background energies of the /detector/

and so, you have to account for -that- and 'tare' it off,

and that's your zero point.



like, when you're running your great big spectrophotometer
and looking at gross macromolecular samples, the energies
attributable to the detecting system are negligible into
a small decimal place,

but when you're looking at the dynamics of individual atoms,
practically speaking, maybe a system of 10 or twelve atoms,

the energies of the /detector/ are no longer
"in the noise" and must be accounted for properly.


so, we still got a universe with a very definite 'beginning'

and that 'beginning' from no =physical= precursor

and so, no physical 'accident' system can be properly described

and so, the =valid= conclusion of =conscious= initiation still holds.

'we' just don't -live- in a vacuum

'we' can't pull of "true vacuum" simply

because we aren't -in- a "true vacuum"

even if it were to be possible to describe

such a thing -as- a "true vacumm"

inasmuch as quite potentially,

'we' cannot -have- any of this

material junk -without- "space"

or more to the point, cannot -have- "empty space"

that, not only are matter and Energy married,

but matter/energy and -space- are married.


and so, when 'we' speak of any 'pre-genesis formulation'

we'd have to be very careful...


to say the least.



all that some of 'us' would be suggesting to whomsoever,

is that, the very real prospect of "consciousness" being mediated

on and in and around this 'pre-genesis formulation'

is a =valid= conclusion.

and so, you get "consciousness" -without- physical =matter=

and this "conscious initiator" of genesis 'lives' and is 'aware'

and some form of -communication- is potentially

available between that "conscious initiator"

and beings composed -of- this material stuff,

and that is what some of 'us', if not able
to entirely describe in words, -point- at
with any method at 'our' disposal.


communication with the initiator of genesis,


and this 'communication' does, in fact, compose

a =phenomenology= which can be studied and understood.

maybe =not= a 'physical' phenomenology,

but a phenomenology nonetheless...


and so, in a sense

human beings do constitute what amounts to

an elaborate detection device for and of

this conscious initiator of genesis

'who' has or maybe, =had=,

no =physical= properties.


'we' -are- that device...


as it appears that the unification

of that initiator and the material phenomenon

is already underway...


but -that's- another story...


or part of the story,

another -part- of the story...


so, 'we' really -are- sort of 'strange'


because we're not just devices





there's more...




and that's where i'd probably start yammering

about contributions of -these- 'detectors' [us]

to overall signal, and noise reduction in

-these- devices because 'we're' sort of

detector and interpreter and being etc.

all in one


if 'our' "zero point" is basically pure noise,

then no real detection is had and it's sort of a dead signal...


but, inasmuch as the "conscious initiator" -is- 'alive'


any communication in and of itself will =enliven=

'our' detection capabilities and other things of that nature...


and the detections themselves 'feed' the new life...


round and round and round we go...

operational amplifiers and feedback

and signal magnifications.



"my soul doth =magnify= YHWH"




so, you want to establish signal,

reduce noise and magnify the expression

of the conscious initiator here and now...


and we point at Jesus Christ -as-

the extreme -focal point- or nexus

of the various planes of existance.


THE Cross


initiating the 'hybridization'

bringing -you- me us in full circle.

to square one




there's more...


commence


et cetera




"zero point energy" is not some source of 'unlimited energy'

which can just be plugged into to make industry operate



basically what "zero point energy" describes

is a -lack- of laboratory 'true' -vacuum- space.

i.e. in any vacuum attempted in some
earthly laboratory, some tiny amount
of energy is still present emanating
from the container and plates/detectors
themselves.

i.e. "zero point energy" is -not- =zero=

it is some number.

it doesn't really say;

"energy is everywhere,
all we have to do is plug into it
and we can run out toaster ovens
on the 'ethereal' miasma"

it says;

"we can't establish a 'true vacuum' in our labs."

where "true vacuum" is empty space.

a 'virtual particle' is a =photon= that
is ejected from the material formulating
the evacuated presence itself

and this =photon= establishes some of
the behavioral qualities of a solid object,
or electron type thing.

i.e. the flip side of the 'wave/particle duality'

it is a photon which is behaving as particle

i.e. 'virtual' particle, not -real- particle.

just like an electron exhibits some
wave type behavior with regards to
its angular momenta etc...

basically



it's sort of like the detector detecting itself.

that's the 'zero point energy'

you have to have some sort of detector

and when you try to pull a vacuum onnit,

it, the detector, still detects

its own energy presence.

'zero point'


it sure doesn't agree with;


E = mc^2


cuz that would be;


E = 0



but you can point at -m- being present

and not missing in an evacuated system in a laboratory.


if you don't have some sort of detector present,

then, you'd never know that you

weren't detecting something.


but, you do have some sort of detector present

and that detector is the plates themselves,

and those plates are -m-

and those plates show a

'background' energy content.


we aren't -in- a vacuum

so, it's not odd to detect energy in a laboratory

etc...



"ooh, plates with electricity running through them
are mildly attracted to each other..."

that ain't a vacuum...


ultra-trace of paramagnetism in the plates