Re: to a simplier atom of the helium

[Larry Harson]

On Nov 5, 3:04 pm, Pythagorus Uranium <" <invalid"@electromag.org>>
wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> > On Sep 27, 8:30 am, Surfer <n...@spam.net> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:03:52 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes Plutonium
>
> > > <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >Now there is a puzzle with the muon decay that I have been stewing
> > > >over for the last 2 days.
>
> > > >The muon has a rest mass of about 105 MeV whereas the electron has 0.5
> > > >MeV and neutrinos energy is about usually that of the electron.
>
> > > >Yet the decay of a muon is alleged to be a electron and at least two
> > > >neutrinos.
>
> > > >So therein lies a puzzle. Where is that 104 MeV end up as?
>
> > > If the decay process causes the electron and neutrinos to fly apart
> > > fast enough, it could end up as kinetic energy.
>
> > I was hoping to use the most simple building process possible of just
> > adding up
> > a "unit neutrino" that makes for a "muon neutrino" and then a "tau
> > neutrino".
>
> > That is not going to work, so I have to take Glen's advice here.
>
> > > Start with an easier problem, alpha decay of U238 at rest.
> > > How much energy goes into the alpha, how much into the rest.
> > > Momentum is conserved, so equal magnitude in the rest frame.
> > > In the muon case, much energy goes into the neutrinos.
> > > Remember, neutrinos were first considered to explain the
> > > lack of energy conservation in beta decay.
> > > -- glen
>
> > Now in the Uranium fission decay by adding a neutron the Uranium goes
> > into a decay where it comes out as Xe and Sr and with 200 MeV.
>
> > Now I do not have the data as to what fission reaction gives us as
> > endproduct that of 105 MeV to equal the muon.
>
> > But what is obvious to me now is that I have to backtrack and combine
> > the Double Transverse Wave DTW theory with the elements of Chemistry
> > in order to
> > unravel the muon and tau particles.
>
> > So in DTW, the photon is this:
>
> >    E-
> > M+ M-
> >    E+
>
> > The neutron is this:
>
> >    E-
> > E+ 3M+
> >   3M-
>
> > and the neutrino is this:
>
> > M+ M-
>
> > where the M's are magnetic monopoles and the E's are electric charge.
> > Mass is a result of the arrangement of the E's and M's, for which I
> > have not yet fully unraveled. I still need a lot of tinkering of the
> > E's and M's to make the mass work.
>
> > So what I tried yesterday was to think of the muon as a multiple of
> > the electron-neutrino as M+ M- whereas I should have thought of the
> > muon neutrino as a different arrangement of the M's
>
> > electron neutrino:
>
> > M+ M-
>
> > muon neutrino:
>
> > M+ M-
> >    M-
>
> > and
>
> > M+ M-
> >    M+
>
> > tau neutrino:
>
> >    M+
> > M+ M-
> >    M-
>
> > and
>
> >    M+
> > M-  M-
> >    M+
>
> > What is going to pull those forms together in a logical means is to
> > use the chemical elements as particles composed of DTW forms.
>
> > Since the photon is this:
>
> >    E-
> > M+ M-
> >    E+
>
> > The hydrogen atom of just proton and electron must not be far off of
> > that structure.
>
> > A electron is this:
>
> >   E-
> > M+ M-
>
> > And proton is this:
>
> >   E+
> > M+ M-
>
> > Combining gives this:
>
> >      E-
> > 2M+ 2M-
> >      E+
>
> > So now, we ask, what would the Uranium atom look like in DTW before a
> > neutron stimulated it to decay?
>
> > Something approaching this in complexity:
>
> >        235E-
> > 705M+  705M-
> >       235E+
>
> > Let me jump back down to a simplier atom of the helium:
>
> >    4E-
> > 8M+ 8M-
> >    4E+
>
> > As I said earlier, those are only pictures of the E and M and the mass
> > is derived from the arrangement of the E's and M's.
>
> > So that the photon and neutrino are the only 0 rest-mass particles and
> > all the others have an **asymmetry of the E's and M's** that causes a
> > positive rest mass.
>
> > Now the muon neutrino and tau neutrino have no E's at all, so they
> > have no rest mass because you need at least one E to create a
> > asymmetry.
>
> > So I think I can now make progress.
>
> > And the Muon Neutrino would look like this:
>
> >   M+
> > M+ M-
>
> > While the Muon would look like this:
>
> >      E-
> > 2M+ 2M-
> >     M+
>
> > DTW is brand new, and its assignment is to unify all the particles of
> > physics, including the chemical elements and so there is going to have
> > to be a lot of tinkering to get out all the quarks (not sorry for that
> > pun).

> and therefore, the Double Transverse Wave DTW theory with the elements
> of Chemistry in order to  unravel the muon and tau particles is very
> much electromagnetic- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well post it in sci.chem then.