Google Groups unterstützt keine neuen Usenet-Beiträge oder ‑Abos mehr. Bisherige Inhalte sind weiterhin sichtbar.

Are electromagnetic weapons involved? Taking victims of ‘Havana syndrome’ seriously

0 Aufrufe
Direkt zur ersten ungelesenen Nachricht

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

ungelesen,
02.03.2022, 11:37:5002.03.22
an




Cock sucking Confused Gender White Filth DOESN'T UNDERSTAND their own
"Smile, Shake Hands, Back Stab and KILL", modus operandi.


EVIL WHITE FILTH in Western Govts are STEALTHILY CHIPPING millions of
humans and LINKING their brains to NSA Quantum Computer HIVE AI Global
Information Grid and REMOTELY OPERATING like PUPPETS and TORTURING them
with DEWs for the last 50 yrs.


WAKE THE FUCK UP, you cock sucking, confused gender filthy low IQ pale
skinned WHITE MORONS.


==========================================================================

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-02-24/electromagnetic-weapons-havana-syndrome

Column: Are electromagnetic weapons involved? Taking victims of ‘Havana
syndrome’ seriously

By Jean Guerrero

Columnist


Feb. 24, 2022 3:15 AM PT

The U.S. investigation into mysterious symptoms known as the “Havana
syndrome” could provide Americans with long-overdue insights into the
emerging threats of directed-energy devices.

Hundreds of U.S. government personnel — mostly spies and diplomats
abroad — have reported piercing pain, unexplained sounds, vertigo,
vision loss, memory loss, insomnia and signs of brain damage since 2016,
when dozens were afflicted in Cuba.

Later incidents were reported in China, Russia, Colombia, Austria,
Uzbekistan, the United Kingdom, Poland and other countries. While some
theories blamed mass hysteria and even crickets, a rise in high-profile
cases — including in and around the White House — compelled U.S.
officials to seriously consider a more nefarious and disturbing
explanation: unseen electromagnetic weapons.

The official term for this syndrome is “anomalous health incidents.” A
State Department spokesperson told me that “to date, no study, report or
analysis has provided a categorical, comprehensive explanation.”

Earlier this month, a Biden administration expert panel rejected the
idea that “psychosocial factors alone” explained symptoms. “Pulsed
electromagnetic energy, particularly in the radiofrequency range,
plausibly explains the core characteristics, although information gaps
exist,” it stated. Its report reaffirmed a 2020 National Academies of
Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine theory citing “directed, pulsed
radio frequency (RF) energy.”

In October, President Biden signed into law the bipartisan “Helping
American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks Act,” to provide care
and compensation to government employees with symptoms. An official with
the House Intelligence Committee chaired by Rep. Adam B. Schiff
(D-Burbank) told me the committee is “closely overseeing implementation
of the HAVANA Act to ensure that all personnel receive the benefits and
assistance they need.” It may sound like science fiction, like the
military’s UFO probe. But it wouldn’t be the first time U.S. personnel
were zapped by electromagnetic weapons. Between the 1950s and 1970s, the
Soviets bombarded the U.S. Embassy in Moscow with microwave radiation,
prompting health concerns and this country’s then-classified exploration
of such weaponry.

After the Cold War, debates about the technology’s dangers became the
near-exclusive realm of people ridiculed as tin-hat conspiracy
theorists. In 2001, then-Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) introduced
legislation to ban the weaponization of “radiation, electromagnetic” or
other energies against people, but it was dropped following media
derision. Meanwhile, the U.S. military continued developing such
weapons, including the Active Denial System, or “Pain Ray.”

The U.S. has been slow to respond to reported attacks against government
personnel that many attribute to Russia. In January, a CIA report
dismissed all but a couple dozen reports as having mundane explanations
such as stress. But in a CBS “60 Minutes” report, “Targeting Americans,”
which aired Sunday, CIA Director William Burns, whose colleague reported
symptoms in India last fall, said he was taking reports seriously.

Watching this documentary, I thought about the thousands of private
citizens who call themselves “targeted individuals” who’ve reported
similar experiences, including perceived attacks by remote-controlled
weapons causing long-term illness. They have been sounding the alarm for
years about possible electromagnetic weaponry deployment on U.S. soil,
but they’ve been derided as delusional. Among them is my father.

A Mexican immigrant who worked in shipbuilding in San Diego before he
was laid off, he believes the CIA experimented on him with
electromagnetic weapons that caused him to collapse in pain and develop
insomnia, among other things.

In his telling, which he’s never been able to prove, the CIA was testing
the weapons’ ability to dramatically alter behavior — by targeting drug
addicts with electronic intervention. (My father was using crack
cocaine, and quit because of this perceived intervention.) Since telling
his story in my memoir, I’ve received dozens of emails from others who
claim they’re victims of similar electronic torture.

Investigations into the cause or causes of the “Havana syndrome” could
offer some answers for these people, too. Of course, many are deeply
skeptical of the CIA’s ability to uncover the truth given its history of
secret psychological torture experiments targeting marginalized people
starting in the 1950s.

The White House has not said whether the investigation would include
cases involving private citizens. The victims’ legislation applies only
to government personnel and their families. But Miles Taylor, a former
Department of Homeland Security chief of staff in the Trump
administration — who revealed his personal experiences of “Havana
syndrome” symptoms in the “60 Minutes” report — told me he believes some
testimony from private citizens is worthy of investigation, too.

“Authoritarian nation-states will go after their enemies regardless of
whether they wear a government badge or not,” he said. “If these attacks
are indeed being perpetrated by a nation like Russia, it wouldn’t
surprise me if private citizens in certain capacities would be targeted
for reasons that would advance the Kremlin’s agenda.”

Taylor hopes his “60 Minutes” testimony will encourage other victims to
report. Many stay silent for fear of being perceived as mentally
unstable. Since the report aired, he’s been contacted by multiple
intelligence leaders and others with similar experiences. “I think we’ve
only seen the tip of the iceberg,” he told me.

The investigation includes the State Department, the CIA and the
departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Justice. They have until
Friday to update their guidance for personnel. Earlier this month, Biden
named the National Security Council’s senior director for intelligence
programs, Maher Bitar, as interagency coordinator. But it’s not enough.

Mark Zaid, an attorney who has represented numerous government victims
dating back to the 1990s, criticized the response as “completely
disorganized and non-uniform.”

Zaid worries the legislation will be implemented unfairly, leaving
people out. Olivia Troye, former Vice President Mike Pence’s homeland
security and counterterrorism advisor — who also spoke to “60 Minutes”
about her experience with the syndrome — shared similar concerns with me.

The Biden administration should create a centralized location for
reporting cases, including by private citizens. The U.S. can’t
appropriately compensate victims without understanding the syndrome’s
causes. That’s why investigators should scrutinize the United States’
own potential abuse of such technology, and collect testimony outside of
U.S. government personnel. Private citizens who’ve been reporting
similar attacks since at least the early 2000s deserve to be heard.

Most of their claims may be baseless. But the health problems reported
by high-ranking officials with no history of mental illness offer
evidence that we should not categorically dismiss them.
0 neue Nachrichten