Neil Armstrong’s Shadow Found in Thin Section?

[Wretch Fossil]

Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and
identified in http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
Source of above image:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apollo%2011&sample=10065&source_id=S69-54910

Did NASA fake the photo?
Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

[pnyikos]

On Apr 4, 5:02 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and

> identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29

> Source of above image:

> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apollo%2011&sample=10065&source_id=S69-54910

"Lunar thin section" is a mis-label. If you go back one page, you
will see the same photo along with lots of pictures of thin
sections.

In the picture that had you fooled, there is a small photo of the rock
itself in an insert in the picture. The rest is an ordinary earth
scene with the shadow of someone. I think the purpose was to give
people some idea of the size of the rock itself.

Interested peoople can find more data on the actual sample
at: http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/catalogs/apollo11/10065.pdf

As for the lunar vines, etc. on the little rock in the photo, your eye
is seeing patterns like one sees in clouds. See my post of yesterday,

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.paleontology/msg/e5a4a55d9fd7980e

for a link to a cloud picture featuring an ichthyosaur and a long-
necked plesiosaur craning its neck to watch the ichthyosaur leaping
out of the water and carrying a lot of the water along with it. Note
that the plesiosaur is itself rising out of the water, which is
flowing copiously down its side.

Peter Nyikos

[John Harshman]

Incidentally, those clouds are chock full of fossilized mammalian neurons.

[Steven Bornfeld]

They look like erythrocytes to me.

S.

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

[John Harshman]

If you look at a SEM photo of an erythrocyte, you will find that it's
also full of mammal neurons.

[drose...@yahoo.com]

On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 5:02:10 AM UTC-4, Wretch Fossil wrote:

> Did NASA fake the photo?
> Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Are you a Loki?

[Steven Bornfeld]

Jeez, here I'm thinking they're Haversian canals...

[John Harshman]

Gould has a fine article about the Nummulosphere that's probably apropos
here.

[Wretch Fossil]

On 4月4日, 下午5時02分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and

> identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
> Source of above image:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apo...

>
> Did NASA fake the photo?
> Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Reply From Lunar and Planetary Institute:

Unfortunately that image should not have been in the Lunar Sample
Atlas.
It is an Earth-based astronaut training photo. The image is
mislabeled.
That image number should have been a lunar sample image. We will be
checking the collection for additional mislabeled images and remove
them.

The image appears to be one of the early images taking at one of
several
astronaut training sites most likely at Cinder Lakes, Arizona. The
vegetation in the image appears to be native sage brush plant. This
image was NOT taken on the Moon. Since this image was mislabeled at
some time in the last 40+ years, it is difficult to determine who's
shadow is in the image. If I find out more information, I will pass it
on to you.

Mary Ann
_________________
Mary Ann Hager
Library / RPIF
Lunar and Planetary Institute

[Wretch Fossil]

On 4月4日, 下午11時17分, pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> On Apr 4, 5:02 am,WretchFossil<wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> > 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and
> > identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
> > Source of above image:

> >http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apo...

>
> "Lunar thin section" is a mis-label.  If you go back one page, you
> will see the same photo along with lots of pictures of thin
> sections.
>
> In the picture that had you fooled, there is a small photo of the rock
> itself in an insert in the picture.

Isn't it forgery to seamlessly "insert a small photo of the rock
itself in the picture"?

[Wretch Fossil]

On 4月6日, 上午9時08分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

Added on April 9: The "Sage Brush" photo is a fake, not a mistake.

Mary Ann Hager of Lunar and Planetary Institute replied that this
photo was mistakenly placed in the Lunar Sample Atlas:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apollo%2011&sample=10065&source_id=S69-54910
(ref. 1)

However, the above image shows not only biotic branches
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
but also crosshairs and human shadows without human images, just like
many other "moon landing" images. No such things happen in the Apollo
training images (see
http://galaxywire.net/2009/06/29/apollo-11-lunar-surface-simulation-training-photo-collection/
)
So, the photo containing the "sage brush" is not mistakenly placed in
the Lunar Sample Atlas. It was meant to be there.

Also, the following photos seem to show uneven lighting:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS11-40-5888
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5888.jpg

Ref.1:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.com/2012/04/neil-armstrongs-shadow-found-in-thin.html

[pnyikos]

On Apr 5, 5:18 pm, Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com>
wrote:

> On 4/4/2012 4:13 PM, John Harshman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Steven Bornfeld wrote:
> >> On 4/4/2012 3:13 PM, John Harshman wrote:
> >>> pnyikos wrote:
> >>>> On Apr 4, 5:02 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> >>>>> 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and
> >>>>> identified
> >>>>> inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
>
> >>>>> Source of above image:
>

> >>>>>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apo...

Thanks to you, too, for yet another good laugh.

Peter Nyikos

[pnyikos]

On Apr 4, 5:59 pm, drosen0...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 5:02:10 AM UTC-4, Wretch Fossil wrote:
> > Did NASA fake the photo?

> > Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
>
> Are you a Loki?

I'm unfamiliar with this use of the word "Loki." Is this an allusion
to "The Avengers"?

Peter Nyikos

[pnyikos]

On Apr 4, 4:13 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Steven Bornfeld wrote:
> > On 4/4/2012 3:13 PM, John Harshman wrote:
> >> pnyikos wrote:
> >>> On Apr 4, 5:02 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> >>>> 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and
> >>>> identified
> >>>> inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
>
> >>>> Source of above image:
>

> >>>>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apo...

>
> >>> "Lunar thin section" is a mis-label. If you go back one page, you
> >>> will see the same photo along with lots of pictures of thin
> >>> sections.
>
> >>> In the picture that had you fooled, there is a small photo of the rock
> >>> itself in an insert in the picture. The rest is an ordinary earth
> >>> scene with the shadow of someone. I think the purpose was to give
> >>> people some idea of the size of the rock itself.
>
> >>> Interested peoople can find more data on the actual sample
> >>> at:http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/catalogs/apollo11/10065.pdf
>
> >>> As for the lunar vines, etc. on the little rock in the photo, your eye
> >>> is seeing patterns like one sees in clouds. See my post of yesterday,
>
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.paleontology/msg/e5a4a55d9fd7980e
>
> >>> for a link to a cloud picture featuring an ichthyosaur and a long-
> >>> necked plesiosaur craning its neck to watch the ichthyosaur leaping
> >>> out of the water and carrying a lot of the water along with it. Note
> >>> that the plesiosaur is itself rising out of the water, which is
> >>> flowing copiously down its side.
>
> >> Incidentally, those clouds are chock full of fossilized mammalian
> >> neurons.
>
> > They look like erythrocytes to me.
>
> If you look at a SEM photo of an erythrocyte, you will find that it's
> also full of mammal neurons.

Thanks for the jokes, both of you. Best laughs for me this week so
far.

Peter Nyikos

[John Harshman]

I'm seriously shocked that you don't know the term after posting on
Usenet for so many years. A Loki (synonym: Poe) is a poster who pretends
to defend a position not his own, an accusation generally made when a
poster's claim is unbelievably insane, as here. Usually, the accusation
is wrong. I suspect most people judge the probabilities by observing the
proportion of insane people in the real world. But Usenet is highly
enriched.

[Wretch Fossil]

On 4月5日, 上午3時39分, Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com>
wrote:

> On 4/4/2012 3:13 PM, John Harshman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > pnyikos wrote:
> >> On Apr 4, 5:02 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
> >>> 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and
> >>> identified
> >>> inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29
> >>> Source of above image:
>

> >>>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/thin_section/?mission=Apo...

>
> >> "Lunar thin section" is a mis-label. If you go back one page, you
> >> will see the same photo along with lots of pictures of thin
> >> sections.
>
> >> In the picture that had you fooled, there is a small photo of the rock
> >> itself in an insert in the picture. The rest is an ordinary earth
> >> scene with the shadow of someone. I think the purpose was to give
> >> people some idea of the size of the rock itself.
>
> >> Interested peoople can find more data on the actual sample
> >> at:http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/catalogs/apollo11/10065.pdf
>
> >> As for the lunar vines, etc. on the little rock in the photo, your eye
> >> is seeing patterns like one sees in clouds. See my post of yesterday,
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.bio.paleontology/msg/e5a4a55d9fd7980e
>
> >> for a link to a cloud picture featuring an ichthyosaur and a long-
> >> necked plesiosaur craning its neck to watch the ichthyosaur leaping
> >> out of the water and carrying a lot of the water along with it. Note
> >> that the plesiosaur is itself rising out of the water, which is
> >> flowing copiously down its side.
>
> > Incidentally, those clouds are chock full of fossilized mammalian neurons.
>
> They look like erythrocytes to me.
>
> S.
>
> --

> Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDShttp://www.dentaltwins.com
> Brooklyn, NY
> 718-258-5001

Numerous mammalian red blood cell remains are found in Lunar sample
10010 in these micrographs:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/misc_view/?mission=Apollo%2011&sample=10010&source_id=S69-45411
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/atlas/misc_view/?mission=Apollo%2011&sample=10010&source_id=S69-45412

[Wretch Fossil]

Did your doctor tell you how to recognize red blood cells?
If not, go to a nurse with these: