Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
ATTN: Those with a direct line to DIG
80 views
Skip to first unread message
jillery
Aug 14, 2023, 1:06:50 AM8/14/23
to
T.O. may require DIG's attention. The last post to T.O. was over 12
hours ago.
hours ago.
John Harshman
Aug 14, 2023, 9:07:10 AM8/14/23
to
On 8/13/23 10:06 PM, jillery wrote:
> T.O. may require DIG's attention. The last post to T.O. was over 12
> hours ago.
Try dig...@gmail.com.
> T.O. may require DIG's attention. The last post to T.O. was over 12
> hours ago.
jillery
Aug 14, 2023, 10:41:04 AM8/14/23
to
never replied to any of my emails.
erik simpson
Aug 14, 2023, 11:53:25 AM8/14/23
to
Peter Nyikos
Aug 14, 2023, 4:05:14 PM8/14/23
to
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 1:06:50 AM UTC-4, jillery wrote:
> T.O. may require DIG's attention. The last post to T.O. was over 12
> hours ago.
Thanks for setting this thread up, jillery. It gave us in the USA early advance
> T.O. may require DIG's attention. The last post to T.O. was over 12
> hours ago.
warning (1:06 am, EDT). As of now, the downtime is past the 27 hour mark.
I have often recommended to DIG that he use sci.bio.paleontology to
let us know that he is aware that Beagle is down and to give us
periodic updates [one a day is enough, IMO] on how soon he expects
it to be back up.
Alas, the last time I got any feedback from DIG was early in 2011.
In particular, he seems oblivious to these recommendations.
Peter Nyikos
Popping Mad
Aug 15, 2023, 4:29:01 AM8/15/23
to
Peter Nyikos
Aug 15, 2023, 8:23:42 AM8/15/23
to
is responsible for keeping the robo-moderator "Beagle" for talk.origins
in good order. All posts, except for over-rides by him, have to go through "Beagle."
DIG also has the power to ban people for egregious misbehavior.
As a result, he is sometimes bombarded with the moral equivalent
of frivolous lawsuits. There was an egregious example of that
earlier this year, but DIG saw through it.
An example of egregious behavior is posting under several nyms
while keeping secret the fact that they are the same person.
You are safe there, even if you do decide to post under
both nyms you have used here -- Ruben Safir and Popping Mad --
since you've told us that these refer to the same person.
Peter Nyikos
PS I checked just now, and Beagle is still down. And still no word from DIG about it.
jillery
Aug 16, 2023, 12:17:22 AM8/16/23
to
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Use of .gmail.com moots problems with using email addys that route
thru Beagle.
The last time this happened, you wrote:
*********************************
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12b0eaab-f47e-4aa1...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Beagle down again
From: erik simpson <eastsi...@gmail.com>
>On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:30:16 PM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:24:47 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
>> <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >DIG is aware of the problem. SBP doesn't need TOs infamous collection of nutters and trolls. For that matter,
>> >neither does TO need them, but there they are. Unfortunately, both groups are nearly dead in any
>> >event.
>> So you have a direct connect to DIG. I understand why you don't share
>> it, but that you or someone like you does affirms my reasons for
>> posting my OP to SBP.
>>
>> DIG posted a couple of non-English texts to T.O. However, whatever he
>> did to do so has not made T.O. work for mere mortals. I ask you to
>> inform him of that fact.
>
>It's not for me to publish anyone else's information. I'm sure he's aware of the fact that
>it's still down. As the good Lawyer has pointed out, things have changed greatly over the
>years when someone could trip over the power cord and bring down a server. Mostly, the result
>is more reliable systems overall, at the expense of much greater interconnectivity, with lots of
>possible failure points. Security issues have also multiplied, although I can't see what implications
>that has for archaic gab groups. I'll bet it's back up sooner rather than later. If DIG gets fed up, who
>knows?
**********************************
It's been over 60 hours since the last post to T.O. History and
recent activity shows T.O. nutters and trolls migrate to SPB whenever
T.O. goes down. As someone who claims a direct connection to DIG, are
you willing to stand idle and DNR T.O.?
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
thru Beagle.
The last time this happened, you wrote:
*********************************
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12b0eaab-f47e-4aa1...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Beagle down again
From: erik simpson <eastsi...@gmail.com>
>On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 2:30:16 PM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:24:47 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
>> <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >DIG is aware of the problem. SBP doesn't need TOs infamous collection of nutters and trolls. For that matter,
>> >neither does TO need them, but there they are. Unfortunately, both groups are nearly dead in any
>> >event.
>> So you have a direct connect to DIG. I understand why you don't share
>> it, but that you or someone like you does affirms my reasons for
>> posting my OP to SBP.
>>
>> DIG posted a couple of non-English texts to T.O. However, whatever he
>> did to do so has not made T.O. work for mere mortals. I ask you to
>> inform him of that fact.
>
>It's not for me to publish anyone else's information. I'm sure he's aware of the fact that
>it's still down. As the good Lawyer has pointed out, things have changed greatly over the
>years when someone could trip over the power cord and bring down a server. Mostly, the result
>is more reliable systems overall, at the expense of much greater interconnectivity, with lots of
>possible failure points. Security issues have also multiplied, although I can't see what implications
>that has for archaic gab groups. I'll bet it's back up sooner rather than later. If DIG gets fed up, who
>knows?
**********************************
It's been over 60 hours since the last post to T.O. History and
recent activity shows T.O. nutters and trolls migrate to SPB whenever
T.O. goes down. As someone who claims a direct connection to DIG, are
you willing to stand idle and DNR T.O.?
erik simpson
Aug 16, 2023, 1:28:44 AM8/16/23
to
me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
Peter Nyikos
Aug 16, 2023, 8:19:02 AM8/16/23
to
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44 AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
I thought the following exchange from an earlier downtime, and its aftermath,
might help relieve the tension some of us might be feeling.
On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 12:33:45 PM UTC-5, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 3:14:36 PM UTC-4, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
> ...
> > The fix to getting talk.origins up again will likely be simple once the moderator knows it needs to
> > be done and has time to log in and restart things. Of course weirdness can occur if some admin
> > blocks beagle from sending or receiving mail because of some confusion, or some automatic
> > software update overwrites a parameter that needs to be custom set. But the main issue is that
> > the moderator works for free in his spare time and he has a job and a life that takes precedent,
> > or at least should.
> I comment on my own witty perspicacity in anticipating the sort of error that occurred. It was a block
> on sending/receiving mail because of an update in a global list of spam sites, so I was, shall we
> say, half right. I thus proudly accept the title of Half Wit and retire from this group.
At first I thought you were imitating Hemidactylus ("Our presence does much to improve the place")
or jillery ("...my devastating retorts"), but you wound up being more modest than them.
To give credit where credit is due, the rest of us were stumbling blindly in the dark,
while, as they say,
"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
But don't let it go to your head. You are king of the t.o. exiles concerned about when
and how Beagle would be back. That's a subset of all the t.o. exiles, and the others were off
in their own virtual land.
Back to the rough and tumble,
Peter Nyikos
================================ end of post
archived at
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.bio.paleontology/c/piprYPdW6qg/m/4AJn2EISAgAJ
Re: Beagle down again
Nov 8, 2022, 7:23:54 PM
With "rough and tumble" I was referring to t.o. being back up,
and the fact that our exchanges here in s.b.p. had been comparatively
good-natured, like the post I've shared with y'all just now.
Peter Nyikos
> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
As jillery pointed out, it's been over 60 hours [now over 70] since Beagle's been down.
I thought the following exchange from an earlier downtime, and its aftermath,
might help relieve the tension some of us might be feeling.
On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 12:33:45 PM UTC-5, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 3:14:36 PM UTC-4, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
> ...
> > The fix to getting talk.origins up again will likely be simple once the moderator knows it needs to
> > be done and has time to log in and restart things. Of course weirdness can occur if some admin
> > blocks beagle from sending or receiving mail because of some confusion, or some automatic
> > software update overwrites a parameter that needs to be custom set. But the main issue is that
> > the moderator works for free in his spare time and he has a job and a life that takes precedent,
> > or at least should.
> I comment on my own witty perspicacity in anticipating the sort of error that occurred. It was a block
> on sending/receiving mail because of an update in a global list of spam sites, so I was, shall we
> say, half right. I thus proudly accept the title of Half Wit and retire from this group.
At first I thought you were imitating Hemidactylus ("Our presence does much to improve the place")
or jillery ("...my devastating retorts"), but you wound up being more modest than them.
To give credit where credit is due, the rest of us were stumbling blindly in the dark,
while, as they say,
"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
But don't let it go to your head. You are king of the t.o. exiles concerned about when
and how Beagle would be back. That's a subset of all the t.o. exiles, and the others were off
in their own virtual land.
Back to the rough and tumble,
Peter Nyikos
================================ end of post
archived at
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.bio.paleontology/c/piprYPdW6qg/m/4AJn2EISAgAJ
Re: Beagle down again
Nov 8, 2022, 7:23:54 PM
With "rough and tumble" I was referring to t.o. being back up,
and the fact that our exchanges here in s.b.p. had been comparatively
good-natured, like the post I've shared with y'all just now.
Peter Nyikos
*Hemidactylus*
Aug 16, 2023, 1:39:38 PM8/16/23
to
Peter Nyikos <peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44 AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>
>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
>
DIG will get to it when he gets to it.
> On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44 AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>
>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
>
*Hemidactylus*
Aug 16, 2023, 4:37:24 PM8/16/23
to
*Hemidactylus* <ecph...@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
> Peter Nyikos <peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44 AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>>
>>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
>>
> DIG will get to it when he gets to it.
>
Looks like he’s on it right now over there.
> Peter Nyikos <peter2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44 AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>>
>>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
>>
> DIG will get to it when he gets to it.
>
jillery
Aug 17, 2023, 7:41:15 AM8/17/23
to
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:19:00 -0700 (PDT), Peter Nyikos
<peter2...@gmail.com> posted yet another self-parody:
>On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44?AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>
>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
And nobody even implied any such obligations.
>As jillery pointed out, it's been over 60 hours [now over 70] since Beagle's been down.
>I thought the following exchange from an earlier downtime, and its aftermath,
>might help relieve the tension some of us might be feeling.
>
>
>On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 12:33:45 PM UTC-5, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 3:14:36 PM UTC-4, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
>> ...
>> > The fix to getting talk.origins up again will likely be simple once the moderator knows it needs to
>> > be done and has time to log in and restart things. Of course weirdness can occur if some admin
>> > blocks beagle from sending or receiving mail because of some confusion, or some automatic
>> > software update overwrites a parameter that needs to be custom set. But the main issue is that
>> > the moderator works for free in his spare time and he has a job and a life that takes precedent,
>> > or at least should.
>
>> I comment on my own witty perspicacity in anticipating the sort of error that occurred. It was a block
>> on sending/receiving mail because of an update in a global list of spam sites, so I was, shall we
>> say, half right. I thus proudly accept the title of Half Wit and retire from this group.
>
>At first I thought you were imitating Hemidactylus ("Our presence does much to improve the place")
>or jillery ("...my devastating retorts"), but you wound up being more modest than them.
It's remarkable how PeeWee Peter repeats the same stupid lies about
jillery, no matter how many times he's proved wrong.
>To give credit where credit is due, the rest of us were stumbling blindly in the dark,
>while, as they say,
>
>"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
>
>But don't let it go to your head. You are king of the t.o. exiles concerned about when
>and how Beagle would be back. That's a subset of all the t.o. exiles, and the others were off
>in their own virtual land.
>
>
>Back to the rough and tumble,
>
>
>Peter Nyikos
>================================ end of post
>archived at
>https://groups.google.com/g/sci.bio.paleontology/c/piprYPdW6qg/m/4AJn2EISAgAJ
>Re: Beagle down again
>Nov 8, 2022, 7:23:54?PM
"good-natured" to include asinine allusions.
<peter2...@gmail.com> posted yet another self-parody:
>On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:28:44?AM UTC-4, erik simpson wrote:
>
>> I've written to [DIG] but I've received no answer. He's not obligated to
>> me in any way, just as I'm not obligated to TO.
>As jillery pointed out, it's been over 60 hours [now over 70] since Beagle's been down.
>I thought the following exchange from an earlier downtime, and its aftermath,
>might help relieve the tension some of us might be feeling.
>
>
>On Sunday, November 6, 2022 at 12:33:45 PM UTC-5, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 3:14:36 PM UTC-4, Lawyer Daggett wrote:
>> ...
>> > The fix to getting talk.origins up again will likely be simple once the moderator knows it needs to
>> > be done and has time to log in and restart things. Of course weirdness can occur if some admin
>> > blocks beagle from sending or receiving mail because of some confusion, or some automatic
>> > software update overwrites a parameter that needs to be custom set. But the main issue is that
>> > the moderator works for free in his spare time and he has a job and a life that takes precedent,
>> > or at least should.
>
>> I comment on my own witty perspicacity in anticipating the sort of error that occurred. It was a block
>> on sending/receiving mail because of an update in a global list of spam sites, so I was, shall we
>> say, half right. I thus proudly accept the title of Half Wit and retire from this group.
>
>At first I thought you were imitating Hemidactylus ("Our presence does much to improve the place")
>or jillery ("...my devastating retorts"), but you wound up being more modest than them.
jillery, no matter how many times he's proved wrong.
>To give credit where credit is due, the rest of us were stumbling blindly in the dark,
>while, as they say,
>
>"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
>
>But don't let it go to your head. You are king of the t.o. exiles concerned about when
>and how Beagle would be back. That's a subset of all the t.o. exiles, and the others were off
>in their own virtual land.
>
>
>Back to the rough and tumble,
>
>
>Peter Nyikos
>================================ end of post
>archived at
>https://groups.google.com/g/sci.bio.paleontology/c/piprYPdW6qg/m/4AJn2EISAgAJ
>Re: Beagle down again
>
>With "rough and tumble" I was referring to t.o. being back up,
>and the fact that our exchanges here in s.b.p. had been comparatively
>good-natured, like the post I've shared with y'all just now.
Apparently Erik and PeeWee Peter share the same meaning of
>With "rough and tumble" I was referring to t.o. being back up,
>and the fact that our exchanges here in s.b.p. had been comparatively
>good-natured, like the post I've shared with y'all just now.
"good-natured" to include asinine allusions.
erik simpson
Aug 17, 2023, 11:32:13 AM8/17/23
to
Peter went off in a relatively calm way (yes, I'm surprised at that), but I very rarely agree with
him about anything.
jillery
Aug 17, 2023, 5:03:33 PM8/17/23
to
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:32:11 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Incorrect. You stated more than that. Your words implied I said
things I didn't, as I noted above.
<eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
things I didn't, as I noted above.
0 new messages