Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

mercury as a catalyst in Prion and Alzheimer Chapt3 Math-Statistics proving method #121 book Metal Causation Diseases

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 26, 2013, 4:37:54 PM3/26/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse

The disease sequence-progression of Prion and Alzheimers

Now in the PBS Newshour of Friday, March 15, Miles OBrien went to the
Wise Laboratory of Univ Southern Maine to see how dangerous Chromium
6
was to health and he shows a slide of a cell in replication of
mitosis, only instead of there being 2 centrosomes, there were 4
centrosomes-- very very dangerous.
Now we can take a clue or link to Alzheimers and Prion disease where
we have a waste build-up of plaques in the brain. Plaque build-up is
where protein filaments stick together in clusters and thus unable to
be removed.
So now, if Chromium 6 can mess up centrosomes so that there are 4
centrosomes when there should be only 2, means that metals can cause
a 
clumping of proteins when no clumping is wanted. In other words,
the 
metal caused two more clumps of genes. So if chromium 6 can
cause 
centers of clumping when none should clump, then metals can be
the 
same mechanism that causes plaques in Alzheimers or Prion.

Now let us spend some time with Prion disease and what its likely
mechanism is when mercury is its causative agent.

Chromium-6 is not involved in Prion disease, at least that is my
present understanding since hexavalent chromium cannot pass through
the blood-brain-barrier but mercury compounds easily pass through.

If I recall correctly the normal body makes prion proteins as
substance for the walls of cells. And pictures of these molecules
shows they contain metals such as copper and zinc as normal prions. In
the case of the disease, the body makes too much of the protein and
the overload starts clumping together. Much like Alzheimers where it
starts clumping into beta amyloid or tau plaques, only in the case of
Prion disease, it clumps in prion proteins. So that Alzheimers is very
similar in its mechanism of an unwanted protein, where the body makes
too much and where the body clean-up cannot get rid of the protein
build-up.

So far, it sounds like mercury or compound of mercury acting like a
catalyst. If you remember a catalyst in chemistry speeds up a reaction
and ends up leaving the catalyst untouched at the end.

So for Prion disease, or Alzheimers, some mercury compound, let us
guess mercuric-cesium or mercuric cadmium or mercuric fluorine, some
other compound gets into the brain of an individual and meets the
processing of prion proteins where it becomes incorporated into the
processing that then spews out mis-shappened prion proteins instead of
normal proteins. In the case of Alzheimers, the mercuric compound gets
into the manufacturing process of normal tau and beta molecules and
becomes part of that manufacturing process where it produces mis-
shappened tau and beta molecules.
And because it is a catalyst, wrecking the manufacturing of proteins,
the dangerous disease causing mercury keeps going around altering the
protein manufacturing process.

If I remember correctly both Prion and Alzheimers require a threshold
of bad proteins to initiate the disease, which if true, rings of the
idea of a toxin threshold. And in the case of Prion disease, when
other animals eat the brains of an infected animal, it is not the
prions that are the danger, but the mercury compound that started the
disease.

Now that makes a startling prediction that if the brains of an
Alzheimers victim were eaten, that the mercury compound could cause
the disease all over again in the person doing the consuming. Or, it
may predict that some rare cases of people who contract both Prion
disease and Alzheimers simultaneously due to the mercury catalyst
involved.

--

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair 
author-
archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 27, 2013, 11:25:34 AM3/27/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Math Statistics of Sleep involved in Autism, Alzheimers, Parkinsons,
Depression, Schizophrenia, Prion.

Now let me list those 6 diseases according to when in life, they have
onsets.

1) Autism is first since it comes soon after birth

2) Schizophrenia is second since it attacks in the teenager years

3) Depression is next since it attacks from age 20s to throughout the
remainder of life

4) Parkinsons comes slightly before Alzheimers at about 50 years age

5) Alzheimers arrives at about 60

6) Prion such as CJD arrives a little later than Alzheimers

Now the Mathematical Statistics way of proving these diseases are all
a heavy metal based disease is that we measure the metals inside the
bodies of diseased individuals and we compare the severity level of
disease with the amount of metal in the body. If there is a
correlation such as the Arizona State University matching cadmium and
mercury with Autism severity, means Autism is caused by mercury
poison.

But if all 6 diseases are mercury poison related, then there should be
a obvious sign in symptoms of all 6 diseases. Such an obvious sign is
disorientation and the proneness of sleeping. In Autism, we have
failure of eye contact and a proneness to wanting to go to sleep. In
Alzheimers and Depression we see extensive sleeping for it is sleep
that counteracts the disease. I am not sure about Schizophrenia
whether the patient is prone to sleeping, but in Parkinson's the
physical handicap of shaking forces sleeping.

Sleep and disorientation are one and the same affliction and
counteraction of the disease.

Now if you encounter a person poisoned by mercury, their behaviour is
one of sleeping and disorientation.

So these symptoms do not prove that mercury causes all 6 diseases, but
supports the claim that mercury is likely to be the underlying
causative agent. What proves it is that we need the same research of
ASU run upon the other 5 diseases.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Mar 28, 2013, 2:13:10 AM3/28/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Now I see that lithium is helpful in treating depression. So if
mercury is the causative agent of clinical depression, we should find
some link with lithium and mercury.

Now one treatment for depression is electric shock therapy, and we
know that mercury is extremely good at electrical conduction. So the
link there would be that electric shock focuses on the mercury content
in the body.

But is there some link up of lithium with mercury?

I was able to find this piece of information, which implies some
special connectivity of lithium and mercury.

--- quoting from Wikipedia on isotopes of lithium ---


Colex separation
Lithium-6 has a greater affinity for the element mercury than lithum-7
does. When an amalgam of lithium and mercury is added to solutions
containing lithium hydroxide, then lithium-6 becomes more concentrated
in the amalgam and lithium-7 more in the hydroxide solution.
This is the basis of the colex (column exchange) separation method, in
which a counter-flow of amalgam and hydroxide passes through a cascade
of stages. The fraction of lithium-6 is preferentially drained by the
mercury, but the lithium-7 flows mostly with the hydroxide.

--- end quote ---

hab...@anony.net

unread,
Apr 27, 2013, 7:06:06 PM4/27/13
to
But they are all genetic which manifest at certain ages when the
genes uncoil

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 2:17:18 PM4/28/13
to
On Apr 27, 6:06 pm, hab...@anony.net wrote:
>  But they are all genetic which manifest at certain ages when the
> genes uncoil

Get a real name before you post to the sci newsgroups. The sci
newsgroups should only allow
real names, no hiding with fake names, for that reduces spam and anti-
science.

When you drink a poison and 2 years old, you will die in minutes. The
same poison drunk by a 40 year old takes 3 weeks and ends up not in
death but debilitating health.

Take the recent example of gold miners in Nigeria whose fathers spent
the day in the camps and their clothes covering in lead. They survived
with debilitation but the children at home in contact with the lead
made them mentally retarded. And you call it genetic.

Now since I wrote the above, I found a 7th disease of metal poisoning
by the environment-- homosexuality.

Now none of these diseases is genetic, and the only interface of
genetics, is that genetics plays a role in what body parts are most
vulnerable to the poison given age of the human. Other than that,
genetics is besides the point. But the horrible thing about modern
medicine is that the funding grants in medicine is given to those who
scream "genetics, genetics, genetics" and then they are given millions
to waste and throw away.

--

Now let me say something about fake named posters.

When you post with a fake name, you can say almost anything anti-
science.

Recently Google made New Google Newsgroups where they hire either paid
or unpaid moderators to throw out abuse such as in sci.math. Trouble
is, that Google should not be wasting the time and energy of these
moderators, because all Google really needs to do is to put in place
two simple rules:

Rule 1: only full legal names of all posters in science newsgroups

Rule 2: no more than 5 posts in a 24 hour interval

With those two rules, the science newsgroups would be clean and
improved and would rival the best science peer reviewed journals.

Because Rule 1, eliminates almost all posters except those actually
doing science. For if someone spams with a real name, then people will
start involving that person's employer or family. So with real names
taking responsibility of their posts, then the poster is more apt to
focus on doing "real science".

And Rule 2 elminates more spam but also eliminates what can be called
the Sam Wormley circus trick of hogging the first page of a newsboard.
The Wormley trick is to make numerous 1 liner posts that bumps
everyone off the first viewing page. So that if there was a 5 maximum
posts per 24 hours, Wormley could only faintly bump others off.
--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names of all posters which reduces or eliminates most spam and hate
spew and search engine bombing. Drexel has done a excellent, simple
and fair author-archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
0 new messages