Tom Hendricks
unread,Jan 18, 2015, 12:07:19 AM1/18/15Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message as abuse
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Life, the origin of life, is more likely to start if it had a 99% chance of starting; than if it had a 1% of starting. So most likely the OOL was 99% likely, not 1%
(or 90%, not 10%, or 70% not 30%, etc.)
For me the turning point to the study of the OOL, is that life is not a fluke, but the most stable chemical reaction to the environment
Though this proves nothing, it may adjust the mindset in OOL investigation, that seems stuck in a rut.