Forum guidelines FAQ

[Edmond Wollmann]

Acceptable Use Policies typically state;
Abuse=
2.9. Posting articles to any USENET or other newsgroup, mailing
list or similar forum which are off-topic according to the charter or
other public statement of the forum.
^^^^^

****** ANSWERS ******

1) For what sort of discussions is alt.astrology intended?

Answer: Alt.astrology is intended as a forum for astrologers of
all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced, to discuss
astrological topics.

Alt.astrology is *not* intended as a forum for disbelievers to
voice their contempt for astrologers or to harass astrologers
about their belief in astrology and demand of them scientific
proof. Groups discussing the scientific validity of theories are
prefixed with "sci." If you wish to discuss the validity of
astrology as a discipline (as opposed to the validity of specific
theoretical statements within the domain of astrology), the
appropriate group on which to post is sci.skeptic. Here is the
statement of purpose for that group:

"Sci.skeptic is for those who are skeptical about claims of
the paranormal to meet with those who believe in the paranormal.
In this way the paranormalists can expose their ideas to
scientific scrutiny, and if there is anything in these ideas
then the skeptics might learn something."

Sci.skeptic often contains long discussions of scientific
evidence for and against specific astrological hypotheses, and
such discussion is welcome in that group. Further, many members
of that group are qualified to evaluate scientific evidence. The
astrologers in this group who enjoy participating in such
discussion with skeptics read and post to sci.skeptic.

http://www.magitech.com/pub/astrology/info/faq.txt
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/propagan.htm
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/charter.htm
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/abusive_isps_list.htm

--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2001 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/

Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

[Spamster]

Edmond Wollmann wrote:

> Acceptable Use Policies typically state;
> Abuse=
> 2.9. Posting articles to any USENET or other newsgroup, mailing
> list or similar forum which are off-topic according to the charter or
> other public statement of the forum.

FOAD!

[Skaatje Sutrice Sidaway]

Edmond Heinz Wollmann, dumpster-diving deadbeat, bankruptcy-filing kook,
failed predictor, plagiarist, thief, asshole, Usenet spammer, 20-time
Net and ISP account loser, physical stalker, unlicensed fraudulent
"counselor" who has sex with his "clients", borrows money from them,
then publicly discloses their private communications after they call him
on his lack of ethics, illegally operating an astrology business in San
Diego, convicted in San Diego on 6/28/98 of a misdemeanor (PC 555-
Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on probation, sued in San Diego for
Unlawful Detainer and evicted in 3/96, past violator of Federal and
State game laws for abusing wildlife, described, punished, and banned
from University servers as an abuser by SDSU, and remorseless confessed

killer of another human being wrote:
>
> Acceptable Use Policies typically state;

That if you abuse like Ed you'll get kicked off 20 times like Edddieeee did.

> Abuse=
> 2.9. Posting articles to any USENET or other newsgroup, mailing
> list or similar forum which are off-topic according to the charter or
> other public statement of the forum.

"I don't have to be on-topic here" -Ed Wollmann.

[Cujo]

Edmond Wollmann wrote in message <956vml$ee9$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

> Acceptable Use Policies typically state;
>Abuse=
>2.9. Posting articles to any USENET or other newsgroup, mailing
>list or similar forum which are off-topic according to the charter or
>other public statement of the forum.

Which doesn't count in alt* froups, asshole. Especially your superseded
charter.
--
If I was gullible, you spinics would still be in control of your
neverending campaign to kill anyone's ideas but your own.
Hence, the fact that I DON'T buy YOUR garbage is evidence that I am
less gullible than you had hoped. -- Ed Wollmann, still clueless.