> >>How do the planets or constellations affect humans? And why is it
important
> to know one's day of birth in relation to these celestial positions?
> To which you, supposedly an Astrologer, replied:
> >You don't read too well do you? I was pointing out that that was a
fallacy,
> why would I now have to explain the validity of it?
> Do you realize what you've just done? You've stated constellations and
planets
> DO NOT affect humans and that it is NOT important to know one's day of
birth.
No, I did not say that spinic, I said that they do not affect humans, I did
NOT say it is not important to know ones birthdate and time. You see, this
is what spinics do, they try to extend statements into fallacious
conclusions and spin the facts instead of acknowledging them.
This is called "Missing the point" another fallacy of relevance--The
conclusion of the argument is irrelevant to the premises. "Missing the point
illustrates a special form of irrelevance. This fallacy occurs when the
premises of an argument support one particular conclusion, but then a
different conclusion, often vaguely related to the correct conclusion is
drawn. We must be able to identify the correct conclusion in this case."
Hurley, 4th edition 1991.
> Why are you crossposting if you are in a state of semi-consciousness,
Edmond?
"Begging the question" occurs when an arguer uses some form of phraseology
that tends to conceal the questionably true character of a key premise. If
the reader or the listener is deceived into thinking that a key premise is
true, he or she will accept the argument as sound, when in fact, it may not
be." Hurley 1991, 4th edition, Logic.
Did you have any other misconceptions and purposeful spin you would like me
to correct for you?
Or is your harassment and defamation attempts going to continue for as long
as you can hold this account to do so?
"His arguments are as thin as the soup made from the shadow of a pigeon that
starved to death." Abraham Lincoln on Douglas' debating ability.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2001 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/
>
> "AugustsBks" <augus...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20010228045557...@ng-cf1.aol.com...
> > P.S., Brian asked you the following:
>
> > >>How do the planets or constellations affect humans? And why is it
> important
> > to know one's day of birth in relation to these celestial positions?
>
> > To which you, supposedly an Astrologer, replied:
>
> > >You don't read too well do you? I was pointing out that that was a
> fallacy,
> > why would I now have to explain the validity of it?
>
> > Do you realize what you've just done? You've stated constellations and
> planets
> > DO NOT affect humans and that it is NOT important to know one's day of
> birth.
>
> No, I did not say that spinic,
He's not a spinic, asshole, he's an ASTROLOGER, and a far better one
than you can ever hope to be!
> I said that they do not affect humans, I did
> NOT say it is not important to know ones birthdate and time.
If the planets and constellations do not affect humans , then it ISN'T
important to know ones birthdate and time.
> You see, this
> is what spinics do, they try to extend statements into fallacious
> conclusions and spin the facts instead of acknowledging them.
That makes you a spinic, then.
You called Tom Kerr a "stalker" because he pointed out that one of your
jabberfests was incoherent.
>
> This is called "Missing the point" another fallacy of relevance-
Oh, yeah. Eddiee, you do it all the time, uglyboi!
>
> > Why are you crossposting if you are in a state of semi-consciousness,
> Edmond?
>
> "Begging the question" occurs when an arguer uses some form of phraseology
> that tends to conceal the questionably true character of a key premise. If
> the reader or the listener is deceived into thinking that a key premise is
> true, he or she will accept the argument as sound, when in fact, it may not
> be." Hurley 1991, 4th edition, Logic.
That's another thing you do all the time!
>
> Did you have any other misconceptions and purposeful spin you would like me
> to correct for you?
"Begging the question" occurs when an arguer uses some form of
phraseology that tends to conceal the questionably true character of a
key premise.
> Or is your harassment and defamation attempts going to continue for as long
> as you can hold this account to do so?
Nice powerless threat! However: "Begging the question" occurs when an