I cut two thin sections from two stony meteorites and found red blood
cell remains (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 below) whose sizes and shapes are
like those of human red blood cells, for they are all anucleate,
round
and concave, measuring seven to eight micrometers in diameter. In the
animal kingdom, about ten (?) animal families possess red
blood cells that meet above descriptions (see http://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm).
On
Earth there are over 100,000 (?) meteorites. I checked two of them
under a transmitted-light microscope and found both of them
compatible
with the morphology of human red blood cells. So, it is very likely
that many of the 100,000 meteorites contain human red blood cell
remains.
Finally, I have an important apology to make: I miscalculated the
magnification times of my transmitted-light micrographs (note 1). I
have rectified the captions of the figures in my albums. However, I
could not rectify the notes/scale bars in the figures and the
messages
I have posted in the newsgroups. So, when in doubt, just take the
numbers
in the captions as believable. Sorry. The mistake delayed my above
finding of possible human RBC’s in meteorites. I was too hasty.
Figure 1: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176740824&p=51
Figure 2: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176740823&p=47
Figure 3: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691684131&p=206
Figure 4: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 4 (1,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691224684&p=6
Note 1: Calculation of magnification times was done according to the
following ruler of 1mm: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176679847&p=40
My computer screen resolution was set at 800 X 600 pixels. There could
be 10% inaccuracy in the magnification times of my micrographs owing
to varied quality of the images.
Second edition of the message:
Human RBC remains in many meteorites
I cut two thin sections from two stony meteorites and found red blood
cell remains (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 below) whose sizes and shapes are
like those of human red blood cells, for they are all anucleate, round
and concave, measuring seven to eight micrometers in diameter. In the
animal kingdom, about ten (?) animal families possess red blood cells
that meet above descriptions (see http://www.genomesize.com/cellsize/mammals.htm).
On Earth there are over 100,000 (?) meteorites. I examined two of them
under a transmitted-light microscope and found they show the images of
human red blood cells. So, it is very likely that many of the 100,000
meteorites contain human red blood cell remains.
Finally, I have an important apology to make: I miscalculated the
magnification times of my transmitted-light micrographs (note 1). I
have rectified the captions of the figures in my albums. However, I
could not rectify the notes/scale bars in the figures and the messages
I have posted in the newsgroups. So, when in doubt, just take the
numbers in the captions as believable. Sorry. The mistake delayed my
above finding of possible human RBC’s in meteorites. I was too hasty.
Figure 1: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176740824&p=51
Figure 2: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176740823&p=47
Figure 3: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 5 (4,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691684131&p=206
Figure 4: Possible human RBC remains found in Meteorite 4 (1,000X)
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691224684&p=6
Note 1: Calculation of magnification times was done according to the
following ruler of 1mm: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=28&f=1176679847&p=40
My computer screen resolution was set at 800 X 600 pixels. There could
be 10% deviation in the magnification times of my micrographs owing to
"Chris.B" wrote:
> If I arranged both of these posts side by side and wore 3D glasses
> would I see any depth to your arguments? Nope. :-)
nope - I already tried that - isnt much I havent tried@!
You misspelt "dinosewer".