On a sunny day (Sat, 10 Sep 2022 05:45:05 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Lou
<
noeltu...@live.co.uk> wrote in
<
e345120c-3bf0-4619...@googlegroups.com>:
>(Ha! I never agreed with Maxwells component in his
>model of emr anyways.
>For me light, and electricity, is just an oscillating or changing magnetic field.
>The
>electric electron bit is fantasy. Proof is you can just rotate a magnet
>and generate
>both electricity...and emr waves.)
If Le Sage particles exist we could combine gravity with EM radiation IF
magnetism is just a property of those particles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation
IIRC Einstein came from a family that ran an electric engineering company.
That company failed in 1896, then they moved to Milan and did a bit better.
As P = i^2.R and e = m.c^2 there is a deep link in Einstein's neural net (brain structure)
something about the way of thinking...
Electronics cannot be understood without electrons (I am in electronics),
for example the vacuum tube should not be able to carry current as i = U / R
for R is infinite. But the electrons form the current like water molecules in a stream or pipe.
General relativity WITHOUT a mechanism, without a particle, is useless mathematical crap
leads to divide by zero and singularities...
In a Le Sage theory at least we have particles, so analog to the electrons.
As to photon, that is where our detection problem is
we measure with matter as we know it, Planck's constant,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck
I have some nice PMTs and done a lot of testing,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photomultiplier_tube
and see it this way:
Our detector is a ball on a wire in a pool (analog to the electron connected to some atomic nucleus)
At SOME level of that wave in the pool the wire breaks and the ball is released and we can detect that
like we see an electron is released in the PMT if enough wave energy hits it.
But that energy, those EM waves DO NOT HAVE TO BE QUANTISIZED at the level of the ball-nucleus strength
So even Planck warned to not look at things that way.
From that and parotting Einstein's FIELD theory that denies a particle like a Le Sage one and gives NO
mechanical (if you will) explanation, we are now stuck in physics and cosmology by Einstein parroting
clowns who do a divide by zero, stating singularities exist..
IN NATURE ALWAYS SOMETHING BREAKS DOWN, no singularities CAN exist.
>However to get back to my point the reference says if it were light pressure
>rather
>than heat radiation the vanes move in the opposite direction. That is
>in
>Crookes radiometer the vanes rotate towards the light source whereas
>light pressure predicts they should rotate away from the source.
>So if you do have electronic precision scales and tried measuring the force
>then I assume you could distinguish which effect is at play.
>That is: If it's light pressure the scale would record extra weight.
>Or:
>If it's heat radiation...the scale should measure a weight loss,
>assuming
>the same effects from Crookes radiometer are at play.
I was thinking if I hit those scales with the laser and heated material evaporates, than that
causes the scales to display a bigger value, making it more difficult to see the difference
]/ ejected smoke ->
]================= laser beam
]\ ejected smoke->
This pushes the scales to the left, as does the laser beam.