Re: digest 2453233
th@len
rec.music.classical (while leaving out the other relevant newsgroups) whose
initial post contained the following:
>Diogenes writes:
>
>5> I suspected that the tholenbot was stuffing the ballot box.
>
>6> Very dumb question tolenboot, but what can one expect from a poorly programmed
>6> bot.
>
>6> 1. The entire world of Usenet knows that _you_ are just a programmed bot. Not
>6> a very good one (really a piss-poor, limited selection of snappy comebacks in
>6> your programming), but a bot nonetheless.
>
>6> 2. It's O/S2 that is related to Classical music, not you. Both are very old
>6> and not produced anymore. Although, the usefulness and our appreciation exists
>6> for classical music; it doesn't for a dead OS like O/S2).
>
>6> Now, do try to grasp those points (your 'intelligence' is Artificial
>6> Intelligence obviously). Maybe you can get your creator to update you. If not,
>6> have him terminate you.
>
>7> You're just trying to make the tholenbot look good, aren't you.
>
>8> Confirmation seen.
>
>What do your illogical suspicions and your antagonism have to do with
>classical music, Diogenes?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>bisecti...@yahoo.ca writes:
>
>57> Good analysis.
>
>57> Love is blind. Eventually she will figure out what a nasty piece of work he is.
>
>58> Isn't it just :-) Talking about Clarinets, Fortran, or even being
>58> polite to the only person here who is always nice to him are things
>58> that the antagonist just can't manage.
>
>59> It's interesting to notice things about people's habits, for example
>59> how much worse your writing is when you're upset... Spell check
>59> helps, but there is a lot that it just doesn't see.
>
>60> Interesting comment to make to somebody who has resigned herself to
>60> never meeting somebody she clearly (although why is a mystery) is very
>60> fond of because he lives in a different city and she doesn't travel.
>
>60> Maybe some day you'll understand your antagonism problem, tholen.
>
>60> Practice what you preach. I see her thinking about things, admitting
>60> when she doesn't know something & trying to understand (here and
>60> elsewhere), which is quite a contrast your arrogance. How will
>60> introspection help with this question though, when part of what she is
>60> trying to understand is the difference between how she sees herself
>60> and how others see her - would it really be such a big deal for you to
>60> answer one more question? It wouldn't have taken any more time to
>60> post something helpful than to post this nastiness.
>
>60> And you couldn't resist having the last word. How unecessary and
>60> unkind - if you weren't interested in the conversation, just don't
>60> reply & I'm sure she would have dropped it. How do you think she felt
>60> when she read this?
>
>60> Did you actually read the thread in a.s.a or just post your critism of
>60> me there? In case you haven't seen it, let me quote some of what she
>60> has said about you. For some strange reason, she seems to think you
>60> are somebody special.
>
>60> Why do you say that?
>
>60> I doubt that you're correct. He's given no indication that he likes
>60> me
>60> or wants any contact beyond sometimes having conversations in the
>60> newsgroup (although he does seem to get along better with me than some
>60> of the others there). He talks very little about his personal life
>60> and
>60> I don't even know if he's single.
>
>60> Anyway, it doesn't really matter - he lives in Honolulu (he's an
>60> astronomer at University of Hawaii) and I live in Toronto, so it's
>60> unlikely that we will ever meet.
>
>61> I think she is more interested in a certain Fortran programmer than
>61> she is in Fortran, but she's rather shy...
>
>61> About as much as your digest, Tholen.
>
>61> Tholen in denial ...
>
>61> So when are you planning to get help?
>
>61> About as much as your digest, Tholen.
>
>61> That's not what I've been trying to convince her, and you know it.
>
>61> About as much as your digest, Tholen.
>
>61> The jokes on rondo form have already been said...
>
>61> Anyway, Theme and Variations is probably a better description.
>
>61> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>61> Your accuracy has still not improved.
>
>62>
>
>63> Catching up on the backlog? Good work!
>
>63> (I can't believe I wrote that - I must have been in a very strange
>63> mood to say something that nice to you.)
>
>63> So, are you still single? I'm sure both Shorts and Nightingale would
>63> love to know.
>
>64> Rowe, you are right. Everyone in r.m.c knows me, and I did not think
>64> about the fact that I am a stranger to a.s.a.
>
>65> Wow, he has a sense of humour. No, it must be a forgery.
>
>66> Everyone is more clever than David Tholen.
>
>67> [*] - tholen
>
>68> No need for him to substantiate something which is obvious, tholotwit.
>
>68> Are you totally helpless that you have to follow what somebody else decides
>68> to include or exclude? I notice you added back groups that nightingale
>68> tried to trim on another post though, so I guess you are not - why try to
>68> evade responsibility for the continued crossposting then? I also notice
>68> that you seem to enjoy arguing with trolls. Perhaps because you are one
>68> yourself. (Are you watching this thread, nightingale? What will it take to
>68> convince you?)
>
>69> The only group it is really on topic for is alt.usenet.kooks.
>
>70> You're erroneously presupposing that it is nonexistent, Davie.
>
>70> Balderdash.
>
>70> Nobody actually asked me a question, thloops.
>
>70> I was not trying to evade anything.
>
>70> So if you don't enjoy arguing with the trolls, why do you keep posting
>70> replies to them, kooky?
>
>70> No, but you post your occassional digests, and you continue the threads.
>70> They would not go anywhere without your help, kooky.
>
>70> Let's send the tholotwit a dictionary for Christmas.
>
>71> It wasn't that funny
>
>72> Even if the source is ridiculous, the statement is true.
>
>73> How do we nominate somebody for kook of the month?
>
>74> No.
>
>75> You have a rare talent, kooky :-)
>
>75> Because you're here.
>
>76> All opinions are created equal
>
>77> Admit it, nightingale - you miss the clarinets thread.
>
>78> Actually, he's not the one I was thinking of.
>
>78> There is a strange bird in rec.music.classical who actually likes him. If
>78> that isn't kooky, I don't know what is.
>
>79> We know you missed him, even though it was for just a couple of days.
>
>79> I wouldn't.
>
>79> You didn't ask him how his concert went.
>
>80> What about the concern of the one person?
>
>81> Why should he be civil to you? He isn't to anyone else.
>
>82> You know what it did to the cat ;-)
>
>82> Is there a charter for this newsgroup? Your ISP requires you to abide by it
>82> if there is one.
>
>83> Is there an FAQ where I could find useful things like copies of the rules
>83> and a list of past winners. I only knew of once that tholen one. What
>83> months did he win?
>
>84> You realy think he's getting any worse than he deserves? He's a kook.
>
>85> LOL!
>
>86> Well, I tried, but nightingale doesn't want to play.
>
>86> She lives in r.m.c and a.s.a when she's not living in a world of her own.
>
>87> How can he win clueless newbie years after he won kook of the month?
>87> Clueless is certainly true, but newbie?
>
>88> And so are you. Will you ever admit that he is a kook and a troll?
>88> Actually, looking at the archives, you seemed to have a better grasp on
>88> reality last year when you were still an antagonist - what happened to you?
>
>89> His program is defective.
>
>89> It's interesting to notice who he replies to in this thread, and I guess
>89> the others, like grantco & nightingale, will have their posts digested
>89> when he gets around to publishing the next issue.
>
>90> Yes, isn't it :)
>
>91> So what did he do to earn that award?
>
>92> Just because it's in a website doesn't make it true. Let's go back to
>92> the source.
>
>92> The nomination:
>
>92> The ballot:
>
>92> The results:
>
>92> Unless tholen has some proof of voting fraud, the claim is substantiated
>92> - he won, although it seems he is reluctant to accept the award.
>
>93> I don't recognize that language. Can I order a decoder ring?
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>bisectional? Interesting to see that you believe what you read on
>the web. No doubt you also believe the world was destroyed by a
>pole shift last year. After all, there are google references to
>it. Amazing how gullible some people are.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Donald C. Patterson writes:
>
>199> What about your "Famous Last Words" line? She doesn't rate that?
>
>199> BTW, who wonders why you always say, "Famous last words", Tholen? You never
>199> answered that. You wrote:
>
>199> "And people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words."
>
>199> Who wonders that? I'll tell you who. No one, that's who. You lied. You
>199> are a bold faced liar. You also post off topic drivel. You've been
>199> contributing to this thread, but it's had nothing to do with clarinets for
>199> over a week.
>
>199> Go to the head of the digest.
>
>200> More digest virgins. Welcome to the club.
>
>200> It doesn't matter that they are here from someone else's crossposting.
>200> Tholen should have weeded them out.
>
>201> What does that have to do with classical music, Tholocrit.
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>Patterson?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>dizzy writes:
>
>888> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:12:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
>
>888> Kook.
>
>889> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:29:00 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
>
>889> Kook.
>
>890> On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:25:26 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
>
>890> Kook.
>
>891> On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:17:22 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
>
>891> Kook.
>
>892> On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:15:54 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
>
>892> Kook.
>
>893> Are you willing to become a world-class net kook?
>
>894> It comes naturally to the kook.
>
>What does your obvious obsessive need to antagonize have to do with
>classical music, dizzy?
>
>===========================================================================
>
> writes:
>
>1> This one was pretty funny. From your posts I can tell that you are a very
>1> intelligent and logical person with good intentions. Thank you for trying to
>1> keep this newsgroup on-topic, tholen.
>
>Yet another poster from the comcast family.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Elizabot writes:
>
>241> Further evidence of Tholen's harassment.
>
>241> Incorrect, Tholen. You also altered the title of the thread to indicate
>241> your harassment of me.
>
>241> I can say the same of you, Tholen.
>
>241> Note: No response.
>
>241> Note: No response.
>
>241> Note: No response.
>
>241> Your digest documents your harassment of me, Tholen.
>
>241> Just because you've told me something before does not make it true, Tholen.
>
>241> Incorrect.
>
>241> Just because you've told me something before does not make it true, Tholen.
>
>241> What does your having called Mike Dee a "buttinsky" on multiple
>241> occasions have to do with Mac advocacy, Tholen?
>
>241> What do your unsubstantiated allegations of harassment have to do with
>241> Mac advocacy, Tholen?
>
>241> What does your dishonest alteration of what I had written have to do
>241> with Mac advocacy, Tholen?
>
>242> Your digest is a form of harassment, Tholen.
>
>242> Why won't you answer the question, Tholen?
>
>242> You are using my posts removed from their original context to harass me,
>242> Tholen.
>
>242> Why won't you answer the question, Tholen?
>
>242> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Elizabot?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>h writes:
>
>8> We need a "none of the above" category on this little survey.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, h?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Kadaitcha Man writes:
>
>1> That isn't exactly correct. The one thing that is relevant is
>1> what 'the entire world of "Usenet"' can be made to think.
>
>2> If that is true, so your statement 'What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks
>2> is irrelevant' is also a "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim."
>
>2> Do you need it explained to you, botfuck? Hmmm? The mere fact that you were
>2> told your claim isn't exactly correct makes your claim a "Classic
>2> unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" on the grounds that at least one other
>2> disagrees with you, as evidenced by the statement "That isn't exactly
>2> correct."
>
>2> Choke on that wholly substantiated and verifiable claim, snot for brains.
>
>2> [insert fuckwitted "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" statement
>2> here]
>
>3> bluh bluh. Is your second use of the word that supposed to be a
>3> demonstrative pronoun, an adjective with the same demonstrative force as a
>3> pronoun, a relative pronoun, or a pronoun that takes on the force of a
>3> definite article? Once that's been sorted, we'll move on to your third use
>3> of the word that in the same sentence.
>
>4> Do you mean to imply that you actually speak in the same manner as you
>4> wrote, above? Fuck me dead. Do people ever tell you that you give them
>4> headaches?
>
>4> The fact of the matter is, your statement has to be read multiple times to
>4> discern the indended 'hardness' of the second that. Without multiple
>4> readings, the object pointed to by the second instance of the word that is
>4> totally obscured, lost even, in the quagmire you are pleased to pass off as
>4> language.
>
>4> You could have got through your mumblings unscathed by using the word that
>4> only once. The other two thats are superfluous, so there goes your claim to
>4> 'quasi-conversational ... scribblings'. Just in case the point is lost on
>4> you, that preceding statement is intended to convey the notion that you are
>4> a liar.
>
>4> Indeed, though it was, as it always is, deliberate. Putting quotes where no
>4> quotes are required is merely a mechanism to aid intellectual sloths, such
>4> as yourself. Whereas I do not write for your benefit, so you can do your own
>4> dirty work or fuck off and die, for all I care.
>
>4> That doesn't change the fact of your scrawlings being unintelligible. The
>4> point being, if you can't be arsed putting a bit of thought into your
>4> primary school paintings and dawdlings on usenet, who is going to bother
>4> taking anything you write seriously? Your mention of Baroque amongst woeful,
>4> trashy language indicates that you are a philistine who only knows enough to
>4> be able to bandy a few posh-sounding words about to make himself appear half
>4> smart.
>
>5> PS: On the matter of Baroque and you being a philistine who knows only
>5> enough to bandy a few bits of crap about... It's La Donna e Mobile.
>
>5> HTH and HAND.
>
>6> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, on the grounds that the
>6> statement referred to actually offers an argument, as evidenced by the
>6> phrase "Do you need it explained to you."
>
>6> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, on the grounds that the
>6> argument is both logical and verifiable. If you don't have the capacity to
>6> understand the argument, don't blame anyone for that failing other than
>6> yourself.
>
>6> Just warming you up. I don't like my dinner cold.
>
>What does most of that have to do with classical music, Kadaitcha?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Fred Bloggs writes:
>
>223> Note: Inadequate response.
>
>223> Note: Inadequate response.
>
>224> He's a one, isn't he. His tally-keeping on r.m.c. seems to have gone
>224> to pot. Still, a single in-situ article of his is worth 100 automated
>224> digests. I've been reading a little about the Chinese Room thought
>224> experiment, and I'm wondering if Tholen is relevant or useful here. At
>224> the very least we could just keep him locked in with his batches and
>224> scripts and out of harms way. Searle didn't say anything about the
>224> person in the room having internet access, did he?
>
>225> He's a one, isn't he. His tally-keeping on r.m.c. seems to have gone
>225> to pot. Still, a single in-situ article of his is worth 100 automated
>225> digests. I've been reading a little about the Chinese Room thought
>225> experiment, and I'm wondering if Tholen is relevant or useful here. At
>225> the very least we could just keep him locked in with his batches and
>225> scripts and out of harms way. Searle didn't say anything about the
>225> person in the room having internet access, did he?
>
>226> And you're going to lecture me about repetition, are you, Kooky? Hmmm?
>
>226> For how long will you attempt to answer in situ before returning to
>226> your digest? Do you decide on the spur of the moment, or do you follow
>226> some sort of algorithm?
>
>What do your repetition and your ongoing antagonism have to do with
>classical music, Bloggs?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>grantco writes:
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
>1684> classical music, Tholen?
>
>You're erroneously presupposing that I made an unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim, grantco.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>1684> How ironic. How hypocritical. How typical....
>
>Where is the alleged irony or hypocrisy, grantco?
>
>1684> How ENTERTAINING!
>
>What does your entertainment have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
>1685> Such a happy little Tholen. Now he's got another whole group to play
>1685> with and antagonize...
>
>What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
>classical music, grantco? More ironic off-topic pollution from grantco.
>
>1685> And what a surprise it has nothing to do with classical music.
>
>That what you posted has nothing to do with classical music does not
>come as any surprise to me, grantco.
>
>1685> How ironic, how hypocritical, how typical, how entertaining....
>
>Where is the alleged irony or hypocrisy, grantco, and what does your
>entertainment have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
>1686> Quit antagonizing Phoenix, Davey...
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>1687> Note how Tholen's response to me must be "saved" for a future digest attack.
>
>You're erroneously presupposing that the digest represents an attack,
>grantco.
>
>1687> Once again, how typical, how predictable, how hypocritical, how ENTERTAINING!
>
>What does your entertainment have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
>1688> Not to quote our illustrious chief "antagonizer" but I think you are
>1688> erroneously assuming that the digests are permanantly gone. There are
>1688> unanswered posts to Tholen still in them. Tholen certainly cannot
>1688> allow them to remain unanswered. He MUST have the last word, after all
>
>The last word is irrelevant, grantco. Of course, I've told you that
>before, which you would know by now if you had better reading
>comprehension skills.
>
>1689> Unless you're Tholen, of course...
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>grantco?
>
>1690> maybe :-)
>
>You most definitely stated that your intention was to deny me the last
>word, grantco. Obviously the last word is relevant to you.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>chrisv writes:
>
>3> I wouldn't know, Tholen, as you responded to a message left by a
>3> forger using my name.
>
>On what basis do you make that claim, chrisv?
>
>4> By the way, Tholen, what does your question have to do with Linux
>4> advocacy?
>
>Take it up with bisectional, chrisv, given that he is the one who
>chose the newsgroup distribution.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>ada9 writes:
>
>2> What does your question have to do with basketball, chrisv?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Michael G. Highwood writes:
>
>13> I could not resist:
>
>13> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>
>13> Liar.
>
>13> Note: no Response.
>
>13> Classic evasion of the point.
>
>13> Non sequitur.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Highwood?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Richard Schultz writes:
>
>6> It was fairly obvious that you were saying "look how much more clever I
>6> am than everyone else, especially Peter Daniels and David Tholen."
>
>6> A smart person would also realize that you did understand the OP, but
>6> are driven by some kind of neurotic need to prove your superiority
>6> over people who couldn't care much less if you were superior or not.
>6> (As well as over people -- most of whom are in my kill file -- for whom
>6> it apparently is a big deal.)
>
>7> But only a very few people are driven by some bizarre need to prove it.
>7> The few, the proud, the antagonists.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Schultz?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Matthew H. Fields writes:
>
>896> You're so funny when you're serious.
>
>897> In the spirit of answering questions with questions:
>
>897> Wasn't Einstein in the flush of his celebrity in the 1940s and vibrantly
>897> active until shortly before he died in 1955?
>
>898> Indeed. And Einstein was not an obscure person in the 1940s.
>
>899> Especially because Einstein was constantly at public functions leading
>899> discussions and lectures and publicly behaving (for movie cameras,
>899> even) in ways which were a poor match for such syndromes.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Fields?
>
>I see that you still haven't answered the questions about your
>credentials.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>th@len writes:
>
>1> Did something happen to him? He has not posted anywhere in the last 2 days.
>
>2> No.
>
>2> That doesn't mean anything. I was only concerned about your well-being. Glad
>2> to know you're OK.
>
>3> Because I was concerned about your well-being.
>
>3> Nothing.
>
>4> No, not posting prior to a first post does not indicate that something has
>4> happened to a person. However, a 2 day break for someone who usually posts on
>4> a daily basis might mean that something has happened to that person. Of
>4> course it doesn't mean that something has definitely happened, which is why I
>4> asked the question.
>
>4> You are one of the "regulars" in the classical music newsgroup. So I do not
>4> believe that it is inappropriate to ask about you in that newsgroup. I'm sure
>4> other readers of that newsgroup would be concerned as well, if something did
>4> happen to you.
>
>5> With all due respect, Mr. Tholen, I have to disagree with you here. When you
>5> post one of your digests, you are starting a new thread. Sure, the subject of
>5> the digest begins with "Re: ", and the digest itself contains responses to
>5> other threads. However, since the part of the subject that follows "Re: "
>5> does not match the subject of the first post of any other thread in existance,
>5> and the responses in the digest are to multiple threads (so therefore the
>5> digest cannot be considered a follow-up to any single thread), the digest is a
>5> new thread.
>
>6> Why must you write in such an unusual and antagonistic manner?
>
>6> Because I am only following the classical music newsgroup.
>
>6> What I believe determines what I will post to the classical music newsgroup.
>6> In addition, off-topic does not mean prohibited.
>
>6> I am sorry, I cannot be 100% certain that other readers would be concerned.
>6> However, I would be willing to bet some money that at least 1 other person
>6> would be concerned.
>
>6> Enjoy the rest of the weekend, Mr. Tholen.
>
>7> It is a fact that I disagree with you. That cannot possibly be incorrect.
>
>7> Why do you feel the need to hurl invective at me? I could point out the irony
>7> in your "unsubstantiated" and "blind" statements by mentioning that I have
>7> provided substantiation below, but I won't do that.
>
>7> Well it looks like we will have to agree to disagree then!
>
>7> Enjoy the rest of the weekend, Mr. Tholen.
>
>8> You are correct, I do not have to disagree with you. However, I do.
>
>8> That's OK. Enjoy it anyways.
>
>9> I did not subscribe to the classical music newsgroup until less than 3 weeks
>9> ago.
>
>9> Ask bisectional, as he was the person who added all the cross-posting.
>
>9> I did not subscribe to the classical music newsgroup until less than 3 weeks
>9> ago.
>
>9> My ISP allows off-topic posts to newsgroups. Obviously yours does too.
>
>9> That's OK. Enjoy it anyways!
>
>10> My reason would be logic.
>
>10> That's OK.
>
>11> Which is when I subscribed to the classical music newsgroup.
>
>11> So then why did you ask me why I posted to an OS/2 newsgroup if you have
>11> already asked bisectional? You aren't making any sense.
>
>11> Which is when I subscribed to the classical music newsgroup.
>
>11> Ask my ISP.
>
>11> I have seen several posts of yours where you followed up to someone who posted
>11> something that had nothing to do with classical music. Your only response in
>11> many of those posts was "What does that have to do with classical music?"
>11> Obviously those posts of yours have nothing to do with classical music and are
>11> therefore off-topic.
>
>11> That's OK.
>
>12> My argument was logical; your argument was illogical.
>
>12> My opinion.
>
>13> I subscribed to the classical music newsgroup less than 3 weeks ago. I
>13> challenge you to prove that statement is false.
>
>13> Why do you feel the need to lie? You stated above that you already asked
>13> bisectional why I posted to an OS/2 newsgroup. (I have surrounded the
>13> important text with asterisks, in case you are unable to see it.)
>
>13> Why do you feel the need to twist your own words?
>
>13> I challenge you to prove that my ISP does not allow off-topic posts to
>13> newsgroups.
>
>13> Your following statement, in which you implicitly acknowledge that you have
>13> done that.
>
>13> What does it have to do with classical music?
>
>13> What is your substantiation for that claim?
>
>13> My opinion.
>
>13> So how was your weekend?
>
>14> That is your opinion, which is no less irrelevant than my opinion.
>
>15> Because you cannot prove it.
>
>15> Please, you are making a fool out of yourself, Mr. Tholen.
>
>15> The string "off-topic" does not exist on that page. You have not proven
>15> anything.
>
>15> That is your opinion, which is no less irrelevant than my opinion.
>
>15> Correct. So how was your weekend?
>
>16> Mr. Tholen, why have you made 2 false statements in your post? In addition,
>16> what does your post have to do with classical music, astronomy, OS/2, or
>16> college basketball?
Note: no response.
>
>17> Thank you for admitting that you cannot prove it, Mr. Tholen.
>
>Suffering from reading comprehension problems? I said that I don't
>need to prove it, not that I cannot prove it.
If you thought you could prove it, then you would attempt to do so. Just like
how you attempted to prove that my ISP does not allow off-topic posts to
newsgroups (but failed).
>
>17> Nothing wrong with curiosity, Mr. Tholen.
>
>Is there something wrong with satisfying that curiosity and explaining
>why you haven't shown any similar concern for any of the people who
>haven't posted in the last two days?
No.
>
>17> Your statement is certainly rather ironic. No need to tell me about it.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
What does this statement have to do with classical music?
>
>17> Providing a link does not prove anything, Mr. Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
What does this statement have to do with classical music?
>
>17> It is up to you to
>17> provide the actual text within the page that states that off-topic posts to
>17> newsgroups are not allowed. Until you do so, you have not proven that my ISP
>17> does not allow off-topic posts to newsgroups.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
What does this statement have to do with classical music?
>
>17> So you do not wish to provide a valid and relevant answer to the question.
>
>Still non sequitur.
What does this statement have to do with classical music?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>HGJ writes:
>
>1> Didn't Kanner and Asperger diagnose people in the 1940s?
>
>2> Einstein was around in the 1940s, although he wasn't a child.
>
>3> They wrote about their autistic patients, at least.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Molybdenum writes:
>
>1> And weren't Einstein and Newton around before the 1940s?
>
>2> Weren't Kanner and Asperger diagnosing *children* in the 1940s?
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Molybdenum?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Michael Haslam writes:
>
>704> It would have been a brave physician that would have diagnosed the most
>704> famous scientist in the world with Asperger's while he was still alive.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Haslam?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Peter T. Daniels writes:
>
>201> Why, do you suppose he would have knocked him down? (crossposting
>201> removed)
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Daniels?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Ross writes:
>
>92> What does that have to do with college basketball, Nightingale?
>
>92> What does that have to do with ^astro.*$, nightingale?
>
>93> Typical denial, laced with invective, as expected from one who, unlike
>93> the real Thole-meister, gives direct answers to questions.
>
>93> What does any of this have to do with Mount Pocono Mountain Chickens,
>93> th@len?
>
>94> Illogical, as expected from somebody who is unable to follow a Usenet
>94> conversation.
>
>94> What does any of this have to do with OS2 advocacy, Davey?
>
>95> Illogical, as expected from somebody who is unable to do more than
>95> cut-and paste the same lines repeatedly.
>
>95> Who is "Ross", Davey? Are you suffering from attribution problems?
>
>96> You are erroneously presupposing that bidirectional is not a
>96> professional, Davey.
>
>96> Classic evasion, as expected from somebody who will not admit to being
>96> a Kook of the Month winner.
>
>97> Classic substantiated and factually correct claim, as expected from
>97> someone who is winning an argument with a Kook of the Month winner.
>
>98> You are erroneously presupposing that Davey is happy, grantco.
>
>98> Classic illogicality, laced with invective, as expected from an
>98> antagonist.
>
>98> How is your post relevant to obsolete computer operating systems,
>98> grantco?
>
>98> You are erroneously presupposing that Davey is typical, grantco.
>
>99> You're erroneously presupposing that you're aware, Davey.
>
>99> You're erroneously presupposing that you asked a valid question,
>99> Davey.
>
>99> You're erroneously presupposing that Phoenix has reading comprehension
>99> problems, Davey.
>
>99> Classic irrelevance to classical music, as expected from an antagonist
>99> who will not admit to having won a Kook of the Month award.
>
>100> You are Davey, Davey. Are you suffering from self-knowledge problems?
>
>100> Still suffering from repetitiveness, Davey?
>
>100> Note: No response.
>
>100> Classic invective, as expected from one who...
>
>100> Oh what the fuck. If I continue talking to you in your own ridiculous
>100> style, some of your stupidity might rub off. Instead, just add me to
>100> your next kooky digest like a good little boi.
>
>101> Why is this post so similar to the one to which I've just replied,
>101> Davey?
>
>102> Classic refusal to admit being a Kook of the Month winner, as expected
>102> from someone who will not accept that his nickname is Davey.
>
>103> You're erroneously presupposing that Davey wasn't born as a
>103> middle-aged old fart, Starshine.
>
>104> Are you suffering from attribution problems again, Kali?
>
>105> Davie, projection is not a Good Thing(tm).
>
>105> Rather ironic, you accusing others of using irony.
>
>105> ???
>
>105> Being in denial is not healthy either, Davey. In fact I would call your
>105> attempts to control others on usenet as moronic.
>
>105> Well, he was incorrect in one sense -- you have a number of kooky
>105> digests.
>
>106> [nybble]
>
>106> ....says Davie Tholen as he froths and foams at the mouth, while typing
>106> furiously. All the time he's thinking, "...must...control...off-
>106> topic...posters...".
>
>106> How soon the k00ks forget...
>
>107> Statement of fact does not constitute invective, Davie.
>
>107> I choose to what I respond.
>
>107> The guy who looks back at you in the mirror, Davie.
>
>107> No. My attributions have been correct. However, I would caution you wrt
>107> attributions; things may not be as they seem. Don't say I didn't warn
>107> you.
>
>107> Statement of fact does not constitute invective, Davie.
>
>107> Denial noted, yet again.
>
>107> Among other things, you study objects in motion around the sun, Davie.
>107> Among other things, I study people that post to Usenet that display odd
>107> behaviours. I observe and report.
>
>108> Classic obsession, as expected from somebody who follows me from group
>108> to group in order to make himself look stupid.
>
>108> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
>108> expected from someone who has won nearly as many Usenet Kook awards as
>108> Davey Tholen.
>
>108> Classic irrelevance, as expected from one who is unable to conduct a
>108> logical argument.
>
>109> Did you consider finding out what the Hook, Line and Sinker is awarded
>109> for before demonstrating in public that you don't know?
>
>110> Classic unsubstantiated claim, laced with erroneous expectations, as
>110> expected from someone whose nickname is Davey and who still won't
>110> admit to being a Kook of the Month winner.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Rowe Rickenbacker writes:
>
>5> Did they? Hm. Well, at least Newton wasn't around in the 1940s.
>
>6> And labelling a scientist who put forward some quite astounding theories
>6> as a retard (which is pretty much what it would have been in those days)
>6> would have A) put big question marks over those theories, and B) put
>6> some big question marks over whether he had Aspergers or not, since
>6> those kids are uncommunicative and retarded, right?
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Rickenbacker?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Phoenix writes:
>
>93> Illogical, as expected from someone who talks like a broken record.
>
>93> Not as much as you do, Davie.
>
>93> You are, Davie. Still suffering from attribution problems?
>
>93> Classic unsubstantiated and delusional claim.
>
>94> So you DO admit to being a KotM?
>
>95> In your opinion, Davie.
>
>95> In your opinion, Davie.
>
>95> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>95> Davie is you, Davie. Still thinking at the level of a 41-year-old
>95> virgin without a license that sleeps at his mommy's house?
>
>95> In your opinion, Davie.
>
>95> Davie is you, Davie. It's not my fault you have reading comprehension
>95> problems.
>
>95> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>95> In your opinion, Davie.
>
>96> I asked first, so please be civil enough to answer.
>
>97> Note: still no answer to the question.
>
>98> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>98> Davie is you, Davie. Your opinion on the matter is irrelevant.
>
>98> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>98> Davie is you, Davie. Can't understand a simple nickname?
>
>98> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous IKYABWAI, Davie.
>
>98> Note: no evidence presented to prove it is unsubstantiated and
>98> erroneous.
>
>98> Asked and answered.
>
>98> In your view, Davie.
>
>98> You're erroneously presupposing you posted fact, Davie.
>
>98> Not my fault you can't understand a simple nickname.
>
>98> Note: delusion.
>
>98> Note: delusion.
>
>98> In your opinion, Davie.
>
>98> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>98> You're erroneously presupposing that there isn't, Davie.
>
>98> Your assessment is irrelevant.
>
>99> Note: still no answer to the question.
>
>99> On your part, Davie.
>
>99> Why can't you answer a sentence without hacking it apart?
>
>99> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>99> Why can't you answer a sentence without hacking it apart?
>
>99> Why didn't you post your response where I could see it, Davie? Are you
>99> suffering from courage retention problems?
>
>99> Why can't you answer a sentence without hacking it apart?
>
>99> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>100> Why are you mimicing BostonBlackie's argument? Are you suffering from
>100> being an unoriginal bastard?
>
>101> Where's the classical music in your post?
>
>102> Note: Tholen still hasn't answered my question.
>
>102> On your part, Dummy.
>
>102> Only in your imagination, Davie.
>
>102> What does your post have to do with classical music, Davie?
>
>102> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>102> What does your post have to do with classical music, Davie?
>
>102> Note: Tholen hasn't answered my question.
>
>102> Note: Tholen hasn't answered my question.
>
>102> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>Phoenix?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Sigmond Freud writes:
>
>57> Solve for Tholen in terms of Troll.
>
>57> (Tholen)^2 - 2(Tholen)(Troll) + (Troll)^2 = 0
>
>58> No. I knew the answer all along.
>
>59> No. I cannot believe no one figured out this problem.
>
>59> The answer is: Tholen = Troll
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>Freud?
>
>I see that you haven't answered any of my previous questions. No
>surprise there, really.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Marty writes:
>
>1> Haven't read your own postings, eh?
>
>1> At the very least, you should read your signature, particularly the
>1> first and last lines of Dr. King's that you've quoted.
>
>2> "Net.dead", eh? I bet you've got the ladies lining up.
>
>2> Violence doesn't always have to be physical harm. Making African
>2> Americans sit in the backs of buses was an act of violence. And you
>2> don't understand how words on a screen can convey hate? Wow... not the
>2> sharpest tool in the shed, are you? Do yourself a favor and familiarize
>2> yourself with the meanings of the words "violence" and "language".
>
>3> Among other things. Why else would you incessantly spew invective?
>
>3> "4. Abusive or unjust exercise of power"
>
>3> HTH
>
>3> Your continued reliance on invective and refusal to admit the intentions
>3> behind your comments about Dr. Tholen speak volumes about yourself.
>
>3> "6. Vehemence of feeling or expression; fervor."
>
>3> You've just exceeded my threshold of abuse. A more interesting
>3> individual would have warranted a higher threshold of tolerance, but
>3> alas, you are 999,999 in a million. You are dismissed and are now free
>3> to waddle back to your cave. It should be easy to find... just follow
>3> your nose - if you can smell anything other past your own body odor.
>
>3> I expected better from someone quoting Dr. King. Apparently you never
>3> really understood what he was saying. Not surprising, given your lack
>3> of comprehension here.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Marty?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>BostonBlackie writes:
>
>1> You're the most excruiatingly boring fuckpot I've ever read, shitlips.
>
>2> It has absolutely zero to do with classical music. It was read in AUK, where
>2> comments concerning boring shitpots are on topic, shitlips.
>
>3> WOW!!! What a zinger, I guess I'm net.dead now, doofus.
>
>3> Please to be pointing out how that post was violent, or how words on a screen
>3> can convey any semblence of hate on the part of the poster, cupcake.
>
>4> Jealous?
>
>4> Nope, 'twas racism. Bashing them with nightsticks to make them move to the
>4> back was violence. HTH.
>
>4> If you feel that my words that appear on your screen convey hate, then I feel
>4> sorry for you, witless. I have no desire that evil should befall anyone on
>4> usenet, d00fus. Why not consult the dictionary before spewing such a
>4> ridiculous claim. The fact that you can't comprehend an opinion that I
>4> voiced and turned into *hate and violence* speaks volumes about yourself,
>4> twit.
>
>4> Classic PKB, halfwit. Please show me the call to *violence* in my original
>4> post to which you responded like a brain-dead leg-humper.
>
>5> Because it was also posted to AUK from where I replied. I added no groups.
>
>5> Trouble is, it was posted to alt.usenet.kooks, shitlips.
>
>5> Classic bullshit, as expected from someone that doesn't know how to sneck
>5> groups.
>
>6> I expressed an opinion. You've gone off the deep end and made the proverbial
>6> mountain of it.
>
>7> I see. What about the more preferred meanings of 1 through 3, which tend to
>7> imply something more physical. It really doesn't matter, though. You've
>7> built a really nice strawman by trying to insert MLK into an opinion that
>7> implies no violence by your own definition. Kooky, eh wot?
>
>7> What are my intentions, fr00tl00p? I expressed an *opinion*. Here in the
>7> alt.* hierarchy, that's perfectly acceptable no what whether it's directed at
>7> some Doctor or a loon like you. If you don't like it, sneck this group or
>7> learn to use a killfile.
>
>7> Wow, had to go all the way down to number 6 for that zinger. How about
>7> number 7, "drooling while masturbating furiously over a reply to someone
>7> else." All because of some excruciating boring and repetitive replies being
>7> constantly crossposted to AUK.
>
>7> TRANSLATION: I don't know how to use a killfile, so please don't respond any
>7> more. I can't stand to have my bullshit tossed back at me, the odor makes me
>7> project upon others.
>
>7> Another classic PKB, cupcake.
>
>8> Heh, even with your half-assed attempts to alter the attributions, I wasn't
>8> replying to myself, kook
>
>8> The fact that you couldn't comprehend that I errantly replied above the
>8> question speaks volumes.
>
>8> I'm not the one whining about my opinion being posted, throlen.
>
>8> Do you have this saved in Notepad or something for easy cut 'n' paste, you
>8> boring twit?
>
>8> PKB, Davey
>
>8> Indeed, it is ironic that you haven't yet learned that.
>
>9> I presuppose nothing, tholen. You snipped the attributions to remove your
>9> participation in the thread.
>
>9> And if my admitted misplacement of a reply brings you some small sense of
>9> victory, then be my guest.
>
>9> Classic cut 'n' paste response from a loon that pounces on a misplacement of
>9> a line.
>
>9> Heh. Ya know, I'm somewhat of a bullshitter myself, but I really am
>9> impressed in the presence of a real expert like yourself, tholen.
>
>9> Hardly. The question was asked and answered yet you continue to be obsessed
>9> about it.
>
>9> Why....that'd be you, throlen.
>
>9> Nothing at all, it has to do with your usenet kookery and asked from
>9> alt.usenet.kooks.
>
>9> PKB, drooler.
>
>9> That would be you, Davey.
>
>9> And yet you still continue to respond to AUK, even more kooky.
>
>10> Which convincingly substantiates my original opinion.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, BostonBlackie?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Aratzio writes:
>
>1> But has Davey known how to spell his name since he was 3?
>
>2> Starwho?
>
>3> Are you having reading problems again, Phoenix?
>
>4> Classic confusion as to who the query was addressed laced with
>4> invective.
>
>5> Classic evasion of point by Davey.
>
>6> Davey is a past winner so ineligible for future KotM
>
>7> Well, please to set follow-ups for AUK and allow observation of this
>7> bird.
>
>7> OR
>
>7> Compile a list of message IDs and a sample of the kooks works put them
>7> together with a subject line:
>7> NOMINATION: Kook of the Month
>7> and post to AUK and the home group of the kook. Thus giving the kook
>7> opportunity to begin its kampaign for the honor of being KotM.
>
>8> No, I may be the FNG in AUK, but only once is allowed.
>
>8> March 1998 Davie Tholen
>
>8> Although Davie may have won other awards in other newsfroups but he
>8> has only won the AUK KotM one time.
>
>8> THNKYOUBERYMUCHO
>
>9> More up to date lits of whiners is:
>
>10> A nice tutorial on AUK and its awards:
>
>10> Current Awardees:
>
>11> OH OH OH OH OH (WAVES HAND!!!!!!)
>
>11> I KNOW I KNOW I KNOW !!!!!!!
>
>11> Davie's a k00k?
>
>11> (Nice try on the follow-up gag)
>
>12> This is AUK over here on this side of the fence...
>
>13> Ask Phoenix, he is SR FNVW (Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler) and
>13> playing in this thread somewhere. Just prepend the Subject with a PING
>13> FNVW.
>
>13> I am the FNG, so I am the last person in AUK that could answer that
>13> query.
>
>14> Fuckin' New Guy
>
>15> CNotM does not entail being a noob simply having the properties of
>15> one.
>
>16> I be da FNG, have to ask one of da FOG.
>
>16> (Shpxva Arj Thl, Shpxva Byq Thl)
>
>17> Nutscrape does not do ROT-13?
>
>What do your unsubstantiated and erroneous claims have to do with
>classical music, Aratzio?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>nightingale writes:
>
>1758> LOL!
>
>1758> He has, but using other names.
>
>1758> Does anyone know if there is a way on Netscape to set up a filter by
>1758> NNTP-posting-host?
>
>1759> What does that have to do with classical music, Elizabot?
>
>1759> What does that have to do with classical music, Elizabot?
>
>1760> Any particular reason? He's gone for longer without posting - why would
>1760> there be any cause for concern after only 2 days?
>
>1761> While I cannot be 100% certain either, I am pretty sure that an absence
>1761> of 2 or 3 days did not cause anyone to be concerned except you. If the
>1761> absence stretched to weeks or months, some of us would wonder & say
>1761> something, like we did last time he took a long break from posting.
>
>1761> Would anyone bet against you?
>
>1762> Not really. I miss the digests - it did reduce the clutter.
>
>1763> Bringing this back to music, somebody on a.s.a described it this way -
>
>1763> What do you think - does the music of Glass, or minimalist music in
>1763> general, relate to autism at all?
>
>1764> Perhaps tormenting is overstating things, but from what I read of the
>1764> thread, it did not look like he was enjoying himself.
>
>1764> There are other possible reasons for posting a reply.
>
>1765> Darn!
>
>1766> You shouldn't have much trouble figuring out which of this lot is my
>1766> home group.
>
>1766> Can I nominate somebody for kook of the month? I think the
>1766> trouble-maker who started all this cross-posting is deserving.
>
>1767> FNG?
>
>1768> No, just commenting on the fact that this group is usually spared the
>1768> clutter of all the individual replies in the thread. I would rather
>1768> that we had not been included in the cross posts, and did not find the
>1768> thread entertaining at all. I'm glad that it seems to be almost dead &
>1768> most of the trolls have gone away.
>
>1768> Is he even still reading this group? All the posts he replied to were
>1768> crossposted, & I don't know which group people were reading and posting
>1768> from.
>
>1768> The last word is irrelevant, grantco.
>
>1769> Really? Tholen didn't start this thread, and hasn't responded in a
>1769> while, but you are still posting.
>
>1769> Interesting collection of names you've used.
>
>1770> There's a decoder here
>
>1771> Or grantco, apparently...
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, nightingale?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Daniel Kolle writes:
>
>269> Kook.
>
>270> You are contributing to it also, Davey.
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music, Kolle?
>
> "And with that, I am finished."
> --Daniel Kolle
>
>Obviously you still aren't finished, Kolle.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>
>6> Maybe he should drag this person on the AUK stage, so we can all have a
>6> big laugh?
>
>6> [OGJ: pna jr zrrg va nyg.zbebaf gbzbeebj, V unir n phaavat yvggyr cyna]
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>Flonkenstein?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>bob writes:
>
>2> Vg qvq onpx va gur 90'f. V qbhog gurl'ir erzbirq gur srngher.
>
>What does ROT-13 have to do with classical music, bob?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>
>1> Not that I've been following this thread, but planets don't really
>1> have diameters because they are all spinning like tops and bulge
>1> at the waistline. I know how they feel, too.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Kennedy?
How can Edward M. Kennedy respond to your question when you have not included
the college basketball newsgroup, tholen?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>blonko writes:
>
>1> This just proves that if tholen does not respond, then they will stop.
>
>What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
>with classical music, blonko? I haven't responded in days, yet there
>were seventenn more postings in the "Diameters of planets?" thread on
>Saturday.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>JS writes:
>
>1> "tormenting Tholen"? It is not logical to conclude that Tholen is being
>1> tormented. If Tholen really was being tormented, then he would no longer read
>1> or post to that thread (unless, of course, he is a masochist). However, given
>1> that he continues to elicit responses in that thread by posting to it, the
>1> only logical conclusion is that Tholen is receiving pleasure from the
>1> back-and-forth that is going on in that thread.
>
>2> Does Tholen ever look like he is enjoying himself?
>
>What does your illogic have to do with classical music, JS? No doubt
>you also believe that the United States likes to have terrorists take
>down buildings by flying airplanes into them, because it continues to
>elicit responses from the terrorists by fighting them and is receiving
>pleasure from the back-and-forth that is going on.
>
>Gad, what has happened to our educational system such that such
>stupidity runs so rampant?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Jim S. writes:
>
>1> I don't believe that you are correct. Tholen has won the award twice, which
>1> means that can still win even if he has won previously, unless the rules have
>1> changed.
>
>2> All Ross has to do is prove that you've won the Kook of the Month award. Once
>2> he does that, then the rest logically follow. I found this page:
>
>2> It says that you won the Kook of the Month award in March 1998.
>
>3> I got confused with his Clueless Newbie of the Month award in February 2003.
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Jim S.?
>Interesting to see that you believe what you read on the web.
>No doubt you also believe the world was destroyed by a pole
>shift last year. After all, there are google references to it.
>Amazing how gullible some people are.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
>
>475> Is this keeping you awake at night?
>
>476> This thread, not that it had any meaningful content to begin with, has
>476> degenerated to an argument on how many Tholens can dance on the head of a
>476> pin. Isn't it time to put it to rest?
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Wehrung?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>invalid writes:
>
>1> How ridiculous, coming from a member of his sig's Funny Farm.
>
>2> His sig is ridiculous, not the source.
>2> Therefor I don't give a fuck about the statement.
>
>What does your antagonism of Ross have to do with classical music,
>invalid?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Veronica O'Donoghue writes:
>
>1> Stalker
>
>What does Lysaght's stalking have to do with classical music,
>O'Donoghue?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Chuck Lysaght writes:
>
>1> You're even an asshole in this newsgroup too.
>
>What does your antagonism of Ross have to do with classical music,
>Lysaght?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>La Donna Mobile writes:
>
>3> Apologies for missing a description of the link
>
>3> For clarity, Beethoven vs Mozart. Mozart wins, but, IMO, the difference is
>3> not material. Or, 'close'.
>
>Also non sequitur.
>
>4> Well, I never...
>
>Never what, Donna?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>vI0WOa...@alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pinups writes:
>
>1> PS: I forgot to vote.
>
>1> [X] O/S2
>1> [ ] Diogenes
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, pinups?
>
>===========================================================================
>
>GreyCloud writes:
>
>2> Agreed! I love classical music.
>
>3> Because there's a Fugue in every bunch.
>
>Non sequitur.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>alias # today total last year
>-------------- ------- ----- ---------
>nightingale 14 158 1613
>bisectional 37 93 0
>zwar 85 348
>kohl 84 2192
>cypherpunk 79 578
>patterson 3 66 135
>fields 4 54 678
>daniels 1 34 165
>wehrung 2 31 262
>haslam 1 29 675
>dizzy 7 28 522
>grantco 7 26 229
>ross 19 19 10
>th@len 17 17 0
>lockhart 16 60
>bloggs 4 15 200
>freud 3 15 44
>aratzio 17 17 0
>bostonblackie 10 10 0
>penso 10 172
>phoenix 10 10 18
>diogenes 4 8 0
>bornfeld 6 14
>charlie 6 0
>kadaitcha 6 6 0
>kolle 2 6 264
>rickenbacker 2 6 0
>concerned 4 0
>donna 2 4 0
>hucker 4 2
>jaakko 4 99
>karttunen 4 97
>andrews 2 3 1
>beck 3 239
>casa 3 0
>chrisv 2 3 0
>g&p 3 0
>greycloud 2 3 0
>hgj 3 3 0
>jazz guy 3 3
>jim 3 3 0
>marty 3 3 0
>†ho|en 2 0
>• 2 0
>ada9 1 2 0
>adam 2 13
>balaam 2 0
>braves fan 2 0
>elizabot 2 2 0
>harrington 2 64
>invalid 2 2 0
>js 2 2 0
>marshall 2 0
>molybdenum 2 2 0
>n 2 0
>relic 2 0
>schultz 2 2 5
>sutton 2 1
>toughlin 2 0
>wiser 2 3
> 1 1 0
>afoklala 1 0
>antagonismo 1 90
>antagonist 1 0
>blonko 1 1 0
>bob 1 1 1
>briggs 1 20
>catroo 1 108
>cohen 1 0
>creevey 1 69
>elizabot 1 0
>ende 1 0
>flonkenstein 1 1 0
>gamble 1 13
>girouard 1 2
>granzeau 1 0
>h 1 1 0
>highwood 1 1 12
>homie 1 1
>ilechko 1 0
>kennedy 1 1 3
>lawrence 1 1
>lysaght 1 1 0
>monkey 1 1
>muething 1 5
>o'donoghue 1 1 0
>pinups 1 1 0
>ploni 1 4
>porky 1 16
>prai jei 1 11
>rice 1 0
>roberts 1 8
>stratford 1 1
>tuan 1 0
>voege 1 0
>-------------- ------- ----- ---------
> 95 208 1055 10033
>
>Clearly, bisectional's cross-posting had the desired effect,
>bringing a couple dozen more people to pollute the newsgroup.
>And several of the usual regulars also obliged.
Aratzio
because:
Tip O The Ten Gallon Sombrer0 there Davie Boy. Nice to be included. My
first ya know and trust me, not the last...
'Ratz
PS you are on topic in AUK, so please do continue the x-posts...
bisecti...@yahoo.ca
What was 62?? How can you decide that an empty line belongs in the digest.
> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
> bisectional?
Why should I answer any question from the person who never answers
questions people ask him?
> Interesting to see that you believe what you read on
> the web.
Not all of it.
> No doubt you also believe the world was destroyed by a
> pole shift last year.
Non sequitur.
> After all, there are google references to
> it. Amazing how gullible some people are.
Is there a better place to look up the results of kook of the month
elections than the archives of alt.usenet.kooks?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> writes:
>
> 1> This one was pretty funny. From your posts I can tell that you are a very
> 1> intelligent and logical person with good intentions. Thank you for trying to
> 1> keep this newsgroup on-topic, tholen.
>
> Yet another poster from the comcast family.
Another one being nice to you, and you put him/her on your antagonist
list. I'll bet you have no friends at all.
>
> Sigmond Freud writes:
>
> 57> Solve for Tholen in terms of Troll.
>
> 57> (Tholen)^2 - 2(Tholen)(Troll) + (Troll)^2 = 0
>
> 58> No. I knew the answer all along.
>
> 59> No. I cannot believe no one figured out this problem.
>
> 59> The answer is: Tholen = Troll
>
> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
> Freud?
>
> I see that you haven't answered any of my previous questions. No
> surprise there, really.
>
Ironic, coming from the one who answers so few of the questions asked of
him.
>
> JS writes:
>
> 1> "tormenting Tholen"? It is not logical to conclude that Tholen is being
> 1> tormented. If Tholen really was being tormented, then he would no longer read
> 1> or post to that thread (unless, of course, he is a masochist). However, given
> 1> that he continues to elicit responses in that thread by posting to it, the
> 1> only logical conclusion is that Tholen is receiving pleasure from the
> 1> back-and-forth that is going on in that thread.
>
> 2> Does Tholen ever look like he is enjoying himself?
>
> What does your illogic have to do with classical music, JS? No doubt
> you also believe that the United States likes to have terrorists take
> down buildings by flying airplanes into them, because it continues to
> elicit responses from the terrorists by fighting them and is receiving
> pleasure from the back-and-forth that is going on.
>
> Gad, what has happened to our educational system such that such
> stupidity runs so rampant?
>
They let people like you become professors.
How does your digest accomplish your aim of reducing the clutter, when
you both reply in the thread and later include some of the same items in
the digest. The source of the pollution is you.
tho...@antispam.ham
4> Maybe Tholen finally got laid after all these years. Must've been the
4> meter maid.
5> You're screwier than a loon, numbnuts. Did the meter maid give you
5> 'around the world'?
5> Guffaw!
6> Hehehe... is this the line where you can learn how to be a bot? :-))
7> Humour and OS/2 go together. Both make you laugh.
8> LOL!!!
9> I noticed the long line and wondered what it was about.
10> Guffaw!!! Clueless you are.
11> You are illogical.
11> What does your existence has to do with a dead OS/2, Tholenbot?
12> Of course I'm posting for entertainment... I always laugh at loonies!
12> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
13> I think everybody takes a shot at the Tholenbot. Makes for some fun!
13> Ed just likes to make fun is all, and is welcome. The way things are
13> going these days, Edwin puts a bit of humour in my life, and I enjoy it. :-)
14> BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!! So, Tholen the Idiot, are you gonna grab the
14> past by its roots? What a wanker you are. Didn't the Meter Maid suck
14> you hard enough?
15> EXCELLENT! :-))
16> Tholen... do you know that you are the center of attention on the
16> internet? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA! More like a pivot boy!
16> Got any good jerk offs, Tholen Bot??
16> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAA!!!
16> OS/2 SUX BIG TIME!
17> LOL!!!! Maybe we should look up the definition of Tholen.
17> Tholen could be a talking clit.
18> Tholen is just a one of the left-behind troglidyte... extinct. (sp?)
19> Bullshit, you clueless dickhead. You know what I mean. You don't have a
19> life. You are a leftover IBM abortion, dumbass. Go get laid by the
19> Meter Maid, Moron. You act like a MORON.
20> A statement by Tholenbot is not valid. Go try and get a life, dipshit.
21> We can hope so! :-))
22> No, You are in error, dickhead.
22> You... stupid!
22> You are suffering from delusions of grandeur,... tholen dork.
23> BWAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA!! Classic denial by an IDIOT!
23> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Stupid FUCKWIT!
24> So sayeth Tholen the IDIOT!!
24> BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
25> Thank you! After a weeks worth of HELL, I needed that...
25> ( My mother broke her wrist at the Farmers Market... she's 89... she
25> fell due to my inattention... Gawd I feel awful for her pain!)
26> OS/2 is a joke! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
26> I like to make up words. It is creative... you are for being creative
26> aren't you?
27> Of course! Doesn't everybody??
28> That much about OS/2 is certain... it is dead.
29> But is it typical?
29> I find it rather enjoyable.
30> I can do as I please, dicksmack.
30> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA!!! Now see if that Meter maid comes back after
30> such a stupid dorky comment you've just made.
31> She's doing fine so far. Fingers swelled up a bit, but other than that
31> she's doing well. Thnx much. :-)
32> Stupid fuck! Maybe the Meter Maid tried to suck your dick but you refused!
32> Maybe OS/2 makes you gay!
32> Guffaw!
32> Maybe true, tholen the dumbass.
32> Who fucking cares?? Luser of OS/2!
33> Stupid...! Windows is alive, idiot! Where have you been stupid
33> tholenbot?? Maybe you are clueless, Stupid tholenBot.
33> Maybe you are dead, stupid Tholenbot.
33> Maybe so, stupid idiot TholenBot.
34> WIMPY THOLENBOT!
34> Get a life, you maggot!
35> Classic stupidity, Tholen the Clit!
35> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
36> TOO fucking bad, IDIOT of the internet!
36> CLUELESS as usual.
36> And stupid as usual.
37> Why would an idiot take a shower?
37> Tholenbot is just one drop of idiocy.
38> And clueless idiots like yourself are erroneous.
38> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
38> You are an unstantiated and erroneous existence... clueless fuck.
39> I antogonize an idiot. What's your excuse, morphidite?
40> Care to expand, bitch?
41> I'm with you on the challenge! Vigilence!
42> Bullshit, Tholenbot of the GREAT WHORE!!
42> Where are you now, shit roller??
42> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!! You preach unto yourself, dicksmack.
42> You don't have a life. Are you someones' dick? If you are, then good
42> screwing... but I highly doubt it. Prove it.
42> The invective was aimed at a loonie.
43> I try not to.
43> But I'm with you in regards to the idiot THOLEN!
43> Maybe I need to find out what a tholenbot is.
44> You lack any semblance of logic.
44> Prove that you don't.
44> You are a syphilis of the internet.
44> Disprove that, coward!
45> Lets feed her some brownies. :-))
46> Guffaw!! Classic dorkiness on your part, loser.
47> Well, I'm sure not taking them from you.
47> Guffaw!!! Now try and get laid like OS/2 really exists.
48> Guffaw!!! You are a classic mistake... most of you ran down your
48> mothers' leg.
49> Because he's a lame dork.
49> You should take your own advice.
49> Nope. And I notice that you are here as well.
49> Sound familiar, Liz??
50> Nice self nuke there, liz.
51> Guffaw!! You just nuked yourself.
52> Whazza matter? Did the nasty dr., when you were born, cut yours off?
You still have your umbilical cord, GreyCloud?
52> Sound familiar, Liz?
53> And yours is classic nonsense, Liz.
54> Look who's talking.
54> Sound familiar, Liz?
54> Guffaw!!
55> Get your own life... bytheway,... your needle is in a rut... you're
55> repeating yourself.
55> Sound familiar, Liz?
56> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That's because OS/2 has died and they can't get over it.
57> Hello Pot, this is the Kettle here.
58> So, you got PMS eh?
58> Remember, you had to take PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already taken.
59> Hello Pot, this is the Kettle.
60> Nice self nuke, Liz.
61> He/she/it works for M$ research. They have a research database of
61> everyone that posts regularly.
62> Hello Pot, this is the Kettle.
And the above represents sufficient evidence of an obsession with
antagonism.
===========================================================================
Elizabot writes:
243> http://freespace.virgin.net/chris.morse/Dead%20Bot.html
Some relation, Elizabot?
244> Maybe you should have written "Maybe it's not dead... maybe it just
244> smells funny... maybe just like Tholen might...."
244> Or maybe not.
245> Ah, another fool on the internet.
245> Go get a life before its gone.
245> Sound familiar, Greycloud?
246> Ah, another fool on the internet.
246> Go get a life before its gone.
246> Sound familiar, Greycloud?
247> Ah, another fool on the internet.
247> Go get a life before its gone.
247> Sound familiar, Greycloud?
248> Out of? it, Tholen?
248> Indeed. Tell Edwin, as he "started" it.
249> Practice what you preach, Edwin.
250> What do you think, Dr.Matt?
250> -burp-
251> Classic projection, Greycloud.
252> Practice what you preach, greycloud.
253> Practice what you preach, Greycloud. They are your own words.
253> Forgotten what you've written, Greycloud? I am not surprised.
253> or
254> Those are your own words, Greycloud. The nasty dr. must have cut yours off.
254> Practice what you preach, Greycloud.
255> Those are your own words, Greycloud.
255> Indeed.
256> You're a hypocrite, Greycloud.
257> Because he's a lame dork.
What does any of that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or
college basketball, Elizabot?
===========================================================================
Edwin writes:
2> Making up words again, relic (little boy)? How typical.
2> Prove it, if you think you can.
2> Classsic invective.
2> An erroneous and unsubtantiated claim, typical of one who lacks a logical
2> argument.
3> Classic invective, laced with irony. Meanwhile, where is your logical
3> argument? Why, nowhere to be seen!
4> Posting for entertainment purposes again, GreyCloud? How typical.
5> Maybe OS/2 is dead.
5> Maybe Dave Tholen is a malfunctioning robot.
5> This is fun. Now that Dave has given us all a license to kill, see what
5> other things we can start off with a "maybe..."
5> Maybe Dave Tholen's head will explode...
6> It's not dead... it just smells funny... just like Dave Tholen does...
7> What does your entertainment have to do with OS/2, GreyCloud?
7> Non sequitur.
7> Making up words again, GreyCloud? How typical.
8> You have more chance of being struck by a comet than Dave Tholen has of
8> "getting" this...
9> Phew! Take a shower, would ya?
10> Prove it, if you think you can.
11> Maybe you'll find another ass-teroid, while you're looking at Uranus.
11> Maybe you'll start making normal posts.
12> Maybe Dave Tholen is the Tholenbot.
12> Maybe GreyCloud isn't erroneously presupposing you don't already have a
12> life, Dave. Maybe GreyCloud pratices what he preaches. Maybe GreyCloud
12> doesn't antagonize people on USENET.
12> Mabye it isn't invective. Maybe GreyCloud doesn't lack a logical argument.
12> Maybe he doesn't have a puerile emotional need to antagonize.
13> Don't use any WMD on them...
14> Watch out, Dave is going to take you outside and teach you some manners...
14> he has a wet noodle, and he's not afraid to use it...
14> All that's left of OS/2 is dummified remains...
15> Insufficient calories to comply.
16> [snip]
16> He preaches Anarchy.
16> [snip]
What does any of that have to do with classical music or college
basketball, Edwin?
===========================================================================
Matthew H. Fields writes:
900> Yes, but can it handle curds correctly?
901> Soaking, grinding, cooking, and straining the beans is fairly
901> straightforward. Even getting the hot soy milk to the right kind of
901> swirling just before you add curdling agent so it'll all curdle is
901> conceivable using a giant Hobart mixer operated by timing mechanisms.
901> Transfering the curds to a press without returning them back into solution
901> is a rather delicate operation, but before saying that it can't be
901> performed by robots, I'd have to see. After all, "bread machines" were
901> unheard-of not so long ago, and now lots of people have 'em.
What does any of that have to do with classical music, Fields?
I see that you still haven't answered the questions about your
credentials.
===========================================================================
Liliana Whitney writes:
1> If your neighborhood kids are under 12, their lines will be better than
1> yours. Trust me.
I have no reason to trust you, Whitney, and plenty of reasons to not
trust you.
1> Gorden's manners aren't what the thread is about. It's about you being a
1> rather poorly programed bot.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
1> You yourself said you were.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Suffering from reading
comprehension problems, Whitney?
===========================================================================
Kadaitcha Man writes:
7> PMSL
What does that have to do with classical music, Kadaitcha?
===========================================================================
Brandon Cargle writes:
1> The t-bot is open for ridicule. He is one of the poorest bots at this game
1> I've read, AND he claims he uses some OS that's long-dead.
Classic erroneous presupposition coupled with an unsubstantiated and
erroneous claim. Suffering from reading comprehension problems?
===========================================================================
Meta Gorden writes:
1> Ask your neighborhood kids for some lines that make you look better, those
1> are as bad as that dead OS you use.
What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
classical music, Gorden?
===========================================================================
Subhas Learned writes:
1> I was wondering, are you really as asinine as you want to appear with your
1> "How Typical" and "Illogical" bullshit?
1> Did someone tell you that was cute or something? (...They lied.) Or do you
1> just worship the tholenbot?
What does that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Learned?
===========================================================================
o...@antagonize.ddt writes:
1> It caught a computer virus.
What does that have to do with classical music or college basketball?
===========================================================================
Rick G writes:
1> botricide?
1> /mumbles I got nuthin'....
What does that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Rick?
===========================================================================
Snit writes:
1> botulism.
1> botonic plague.
2> That's a-bot the size of it.
3> Amazing how many people bot it.
3> :)
4> Yeah, well, you can bot... no... an unborn bot... no... beyond a botty
4> doubt.... no ... no .. no... !
4> DAMN. Out of'm!
4> :)
5> Glad I could help... and I wish your mother well...
What does any of that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Snit?
===========================================================================
Aquila Deus writes:
1> How can a bot be dead???
What does that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Deus?
===========================================================================
relic writes:
3> DUH! That's pretty obvious.
4> Thoroughly spanked.
5> ROTFL
6> Tolfenbot, you lost the vote. Go die somewhere now (like your dead OS).
7> Edwin. Get fucked.
8> Look nutcasebot, I have no need to post arguments with idiots (That would be
8> you). Instead, take my advice and get fucked.
9> Zombies are like that. (They also think O/S2 is alive.)
10> Enjoyed 'em.
11> Asked and answered. Having problems following the thread tofubot?
12> Oooo... so close. I'd bet against it, his bot programming is too limited.
What does any of that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, relic?
===========================================================================
chrisv writes:
5> Note: No response.
6> You tell him, Tholen.
7> Responding to yourself, eh tholen?
8> Note that Tholen did NOT respond with "Classic unsubstantiated and
8> erroneous claim".
What does any of that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, chrisv?
===========================================================================
Sigmond Freud writes:
60> Subject: Tholen your mother called
60> She asked me to tell you to stop trolling.
What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
Freud?
I see that you haven't answered any of my previous questions. No
surprise there, really.
===========================================================================
Mr.Extreme writes:
1> It takes a KOOK, to know a fucking Kook. You brainwashed bastard.
What does that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Extreme?
===========================================================================
HGJ writes:
4> Are you sure that Monica and Rowe read rec.music.classical? Maybe
4> they're more likely to respond if you post your questions in
4> alt.support.autism.
4> What does the number 2453233 in the subject line stand for?
What does any of that have to do with classical music, HGJ?
===========================================================================
dizzy writes:
895> "Kooky 'til death" is his motto.
895> Only a reboot can kill the script.
895> Fortunately, Google is preserving it all for posterity, which should
895> prove a gold mine for future physiological studies. Just search on
895> "tholen" and start reading (and laughing).
Yes, your puerile behavior has been preserved for future studies, dizzy.
What does your obvious obsessive need to antagonize have to do with
classical music, dizzy?
===========================================================================
Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
477> No, he's the One, the Only, the Tholen. To him that makes all the diffeence.
478> Coelacanth OS?
What does any of that have to do with classical music, Wehrung?
===========================================================================
Fred Bloggs writes:
227> Still crazy after all these years, Tholen?
227> You make it sound like you have to reply to them - like your output is
227> the result of a computer program which cannot be stopped or altered in
227> any way!
227> That's not true though, is it? You can simply decide that as of
227> midnight tonight you're not going to respond to any more antagonism
227> (even if "he started it"). You'd notice an almost immediate drop in
227> the number of people "antagonizing" you which would be long lasting,
227> except perhaps for the occasional post by people who only read this
227> newsgroup occasionally, wondering where that funny little man who
227> seemed to have a persecution complex and too much time on his hands.
228> Some individuals call you Tolfenbot, others call you Tholen. They're
228> both just words or sounds used to distinguish you from others. Why
228> should one be any more relevant than any other?
228> No he's not. By posting to comp.os.os2.advocacy you're associating
228> yourself with a dead OS, which, for the purpose of ease of
228> communication may be described as your OS, in the same way that were
228> you to actually post to rec.music.classical about classical music more
228> often than you post your off-topic, yet amusing, persecution complex,
228> you'd be associating yourself with that particular genre of music,
228> which would then allow people to accurately refer to `your` music. Got
228> it?
What does any of that have to do with classical music, Bloggs?
===========================================================================
Donald C. Patterson writes:
202> Warning! Warning! Irony meter overload! Run for your lives. Every man
202> for himself!!!
202> AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
Patterson?
202> BTW, Tholen:
202> What does this digest have to do with classical music?
I've been asking what your antagonistic postings have to do with
classical music for some time, Patterson. When do you plan to
answer that question?
202> You're a hypocrite.
What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
classical music, Patterson?
===========================================================================
grantco writes:
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> You'd know if you had better reading comprehension skills, tholen...
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> In response to Tholen's off-topic pollution posted in this newsgroup,
1691> of course....
1691> Ah, there's that playground logic again from Tholen. How cute...
1691> More ironic off-topic pollution from Tholen.
1691> Glad to see that you acknowledge being Davey, Tholen...
1691> You're right, Tholen. Your digest obviously represents more off-topic
1691> pollution from you, Tholen...
1691> And it has nothing to do with classical music. How ironic...
1691> This is where you wrote your off-topic pollution in response to me,
1691> Tholen.
1691> Your posts prove otherwise, Tholen. How ironic...
1691> This is where you are writing Tholen. Perhaps if your off-topic
1691> pollution were elsewhere it also would be on-topic, Tholen?
1691> I didn't realize you were Nightingale, Tholen...
1691> How Tholen of you, Tholen...
What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
grantco?
===========================================================================
Aratzio writes:
18> Tip O The Ten Gallon Sombrer0 there Davie Boy. Nice to be included. My
18> first ya know and trust me, not the last...
18> 'Ratz
18> PS you are on topic in AUK, so please do continue the x-posts...
What do your unsubstantiated and erroneous claims have to do with
classical music, Aratzio?
===========================================================================
th@len writes:
18> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:49:11 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham started a new thread in
18> rec.music.classical (while leaving out the other relevant newsgroups) whose
18> initial post contained the following:
What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with
classical music?
18> Note: no response.
18> If you thought you could prove it, then you would attempt to do so. Just like
18> how you attempted to prove that my ISP does not allow off-topic posts to
18> newsgroups (but failed).
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
18> No.
18> What does this statement have to do with classical music?
18> What does this statement have to do with classical music?
18> What does this statement have to do with classical music?
18> What does this statement have to do with classical music?
That's what I've been asking you.
===========================================================================
invalid writes:
3> The antagonism for the award Tholen is forecasted very hard "this
3> year".
That's not even grammatical, invalid.
===========================================================================
Reginal Mirah writes:
1> Holy shit! Another one. The entire OS2.dead.os group is full of fucking
1> nuts.
What does your erroneous presupposition have to do with classical music
or college basketball, Mirah?
===========================================================================
bisecti...@yahoo.ca writes:
94> LOL! Figures his mom would rather talk to a troll than to him.
95> What was 62?? How can you decide that an empty line belongs in the digest.
95> Why should I answer any question from the person who never answers
95> questions people ask him?
95> Not all of it.
95> Non sequitur.
95> Is there a better place to look up the results of kook of the month
95> elections than the archives of alt.usenet.kooks?
95> Another one being nice to you, and you put him/her on your antagonist
95> list. I'll bet you have no friends at all.
95> Ironic, coming from the one who answers so few of the questions asked of
95> him.
95> They let people like you become professors.
95> How does your digest accomplish your aim of reducing the clutter, when
95> you both reply in the thread and later include some of the same items in
95> the digest. The source of the pollution is you.
96> Right, his claim is erroneous: you don't act like a moron, you are one.
97> Why are you antagonizing Greycloud, Tholenbot lite?
98> No more so than you and Tholenbot.
99> LOL!
99> It's just how his email program is set up. Get a sense of humor!
99> What does your question have to do with Fortran?
99> No, it was just a joke, which you would know if had better reading
99> comprehension skills.
99> What did you hope to accomplish with these silly replies to somebody who
99> was kind enough to post information for you?
99> I'm not surprised that you have accumulated so many antagonists on so
99> many different groups.
What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
bisectional?
===========================================================================
Maranda Durante writes:
1> ElizaSlutbot, you must really have some facination with GreyCloud to keep
1> a database of everything he's posted.
What does that have to do with OS/2, classical music, or college
basketball, Durante?
===========================================================================
alias # today total last year
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
nightingale 158 1613
bisectional 6 99 0
zwar 85 348
kohl 84 2192
cypherpunk 79 578
patterson 1 67 135
greycloud 59 62 0
fields 2 56 678
daniels 34 165
wehrung 2 33 262
dizzy 1 29 522
haslam 29 675
grantco 1 27 229
ross 19 10
aratzio 1 18 0
th@len 1 18 0
bloggs 2 17 200
elizabot 15 16 0
freud 1 16 44
lockhart 16 60
edwin 15 15 0
relic 10 12 0
bostonblackie 10 0
penso 10 172
phoenix 10 18
diogenes 8 0
chrisv 4 7 0
kadaitcha 1 7 0
bornfeld 6 14
charlie 6 0
kolle 6 264
rickenbacker 6 0
snit 5 5 0
concerned 4 0
donna 4 0
hgj 1 4 0
hucker 4 2
jaakko 4 99
karttunen 4 97
andrews 3 1
beck 3 239
casa 3 0
g&p 3 0
invalid 1 3 0
jazz guy 3 3
jim 3 0
marty 3 0
†ho|en 2 0
• 2 0
ada9 2 0
adam 2 13
balaam 2 0
braves fan 2 0
elizabot 2 0
harrington 2 64
js 2 0
marshall 2 0
molybdenum 2 0
n 2 0
schultz 2 5
sutton 2 1
toughlin 2 0
wiser 2 3
. 1 0
afoklala 1 0
antagonismo 1 90
antagonist 1 0
blonko 1 0
bob 1 1
briggs 1 20
cargle 1 1 0
catroo 1 108
cohen 1 0
creevey 1 69
deus 1 1 0
durante 1 1 0
ende 1 0
extreme 1 1 0
flonkenstein 1 0
gamble 1 13
girouard 1 2
gorden 1 1 0
granzeau 1 0
h 1 0
highwood 1 12
homie 1 1
ilechko 1 0
kennedy 1 3
lawrence 1 1
learned 1 1 0
lysaght 1 0
mirah 1 1 0
monkey 1 1
muething 1 5
o'donoghue 1 0
ot 1 1 0
pinups 1 0
ploni 1 4
porky 1 16
prai jei 1 11
rice 1 0
rick 1 1 0
roberts 1 8
stratford 1 1
tuan 1 0
voege 1 0
whitney 1 1 0
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
107 139 1194 10033
b s
rec.sport.basketball.college? This is identical to the one you posted
in rec.music.classical, and includes people who have never posted in
the other three groups.
I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
tho...@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<az7Wc.10980$aB1....@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
Aratzio
transparently proposed:
>So why did you post this to sci.astro, comp.os.os2.advocacy, and
>rec.sport.basketball.college? This is identical to the one you posted
>in rec.music.classical, and includes people who have never posted in
>the other three groups.
>
>I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>
>
>tho...@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<az7Wc.10980$aB1....@twister.socal.rr.com>...
>
All that really matters is Davie made a lits and I am on the lits.
dizzy
>I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
tho...@antispam.ham
> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Aratzio
proposed:
Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
'Ratz
Edward M. Kennedy
> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled and you
all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
repeatedly.
Thanks,
--Tedward
Peter J Ross
> "dizzy" <di...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
"blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
> and you
> all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
> repeatedly.
You are erroneously presupposing that you can tell what a Usenet
poster looks like, Kennedy.
--
PJR :-)
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)
tho...@antispam.ham
>> dizzy writes:
>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
tho...@antispam.ham
> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled and you
> all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
> repeatedly.
I'm well aware of your trolling, Kennedy. How it looks to you is
quite irrelevant; the facts are relevant.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>> dizzy wrote:
>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
dizzy
Liar. You are a proven hypocrite, tholen. The issue that bisectional
mentioned is but one example of your hypocrisy, and is a matter of
record.
dizzy
Irrelevant; that's a different definition of the word "tholed".
Dr. Flonkenstein
Maybe step children do, step by step.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
dizzy
>Aratzio writes:
>
>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>
>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>
>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>
>Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>
>You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
I've been discussing a kook, tholen. Still suffering from reading
comprehension problems?
grantco
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
> Maybe step children do, step by step.
Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled and you
>>> all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
>>> repeatedly.
>> I'm well aware of your trolling, Kennedy. How it looks to you is
>> quite irrelevant; the facts are relevant.
> What facts?
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:44 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> dizzy writes:
>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Liar.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> You are a proven hypocrite, tholen.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> The issue that bisectional mentioned is but one example of your
> hypocrisy, and is a matter of record.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:38:16 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
> Irrelevant;
On the contrary, it's quite relevant, given the grammatical use, dizzy.
> that's a different definition of the word "tholed".
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:27:55 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> Aratzio writes:
>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>> Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>> claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
> But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
If you find your response to be lame, erroneous, and scripted,
that's your problem, dizzy.
>>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>> You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
> I've been discussing a kook, tholen.
Discussing yourself, dizzy?
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
Fred Bloggs
> And the above represents sufficient evidence of an obsession with
> antagonism.
And the below doesn't, Tholen? Classic inconsistency!
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
As did the antagonist-in-chief.
Coby Beck
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:C4jXc.12096$aB1....@twister.socal.rr.com...
> dizzy writes:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:44 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
To Whom it May Concern:
Please note the above error in your Central Responder Unit. I'm sure you
will wish to rectify it ASAP to avoid further corruption of Usenet.
Thank you,
A Concerned Antagonist.
tho...@antispam.ham
> And the below doesn't, Tholen?
Obviously it doesn't, Bloggs.
> Classic inconsistency!
You're erroneously presupposing that what was below constitutes
antagonism, Bloggs.
> As did the antagonist-in-chief.
I already noted that bisectional did, Bloggs. No need to repeat
it.
Dr. Flonkenstein
On that case it is stone by stone.
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:27:55 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
>>> Aratzio writes:
>
>>>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>
>>>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>
>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>
>>> Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>>> claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
>
>> But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
>
>If you find your response to be lame, erroneous, and scripted,
>that's your problem, dizzy.
Classic thole.
>>>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>
>>> You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
>
>> I've been discussing a kook, tholen.
>
>Discussing yourself, dizzy?
No, I've been discussing you, tholen. Still suffering from reading
comprehension problems?
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Wrong again, tholen.
dizzy
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:40:33 GMT, tholen tholed:
>dizzy writes:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:38:16 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
>>> Peter J Ross writes:
>
>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
>>>>> dizzy wrote:
>
>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>
>>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>
>>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>
>> Irrelevant;
>
>On the contrary, it's quite relevant,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>given the grammatical use, dizzy.
On what basis do you make that claim, tholen?
>> that's a different definition of the word "tholed".
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
tho...@antispam.ham
> Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:36:23 +0000, tholen posted:
You're erroneously presupposing that I've been lurking at all,
Flonkenstein.
>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>>>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>>> Maybe step children do, step by step.
>> Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
> On that case it is stone by stone.
Classic pontification.
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> dizzy writes:
>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:27:55 GMT, tholen tholed:
>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I see that you didn't
answer the question, dizzy, choosing instead to evade it with an
unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> Aratzio writes:
>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>>>>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>>>> Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>>>> claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
>>> But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
>> If you find your response to be lame, erroneous, and scripted,
>> that's your problem, dizzy.
> Classic thole.
Non sequitur, given that oar pins are not involved, dizzy.
>>>>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>>>> You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
>>> I've been discussing a kook, tholen.
>> Discussing yourself, dizzy?
> No, I've been discussing you, tholen.
Illogical, dizzy.
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
You're erroneously presupposing that I've been suffering from
reading comprehension problems at all, dizzy.
>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Wrong again, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Michael Lockhart
news:gTtXc.13121$Bt5....@twister.socal.rr.com...
> dizzy writes:
>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
David, what's with the sudden change in your posting? I thought you were
going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your digest.
Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it
does appear to be you. What's up?
Michael
Dr. Flonkenstein
Obsolete ramification.
Aratzio
<gregoriy_rasp...@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:
>Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:52:57 +0000, tholen posted:
>
>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>
>>> Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:36:23 +0000, tholen
>>> posted:
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I've been lurking at all,
>> Flonkenstein.
>>
>>>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>
>>>>>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>
>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>
>>>>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>
>>>>>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>>
>>>>>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>>
>>>>> Maybe step children do, step by step.
>>
>>>> Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
>>
>>> On that case it is stone by stone.
>>
>> Classic pontification.
>
>Obsolete ramification.
Missive proliferation.
tho...@antispam.ham
>> dizzy writes:
>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
> David, what's with the sudden change in your posting? I thought you were
> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your digest.
> Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it
> does appear to be you. What's up?
What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:52:57 +0000, tholen posted:
You're erroneously presupposing that I've been lurking at all,
Flonkenstein.
>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>> Being tired of lurking, on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:36:23 +0000, tholen
>>> posted:
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I've been lurking at all,
>> Flonkenstein.
Note: no response.
>>>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>>>>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>>>>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>>>>>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>>>>> Maybe step children do, step by step.
>>>> Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
>>> On that case it is stone by stone.
>> Classic pontification.
> Obsolete ramification.
Non sequitur.
Michael Lockhart
news:QhEXc.13678$Bt5....@twister.socal.rr.com...
> Michael Lockhart writes:
>
>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
Evasion noted.
>> David, what's with the sudden change in your posting? I thought you were
>> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your
>> digest.
>> Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
>> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it
>> does appear to be you. What's up?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
Evasion noted.
Michael
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
> Evasion noted.
Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
evasion, Lockhart.
>>> David, what's with the sudden change in your posting? I thought you were
>>> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your
>>> digest.
>>> Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
>>> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it
>>> does appear to be you. What's up?
>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
> Evasion noted.
Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
evasion, Lockhart.
mc
Fred Bloggs
> Fred Bloggs writes:
>
> > And the below doesn't, Tholen?
>
> Obviously it doesn't, Bloggs.
Obviously, Tholen? I disagree - it's a pretty good indication.
> > Classic inconsistency!
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that what was below constitutes
> antagonism, Bloggs.
It antagonises, to the extent that many people feel compelled to
respond. If that's not antagonistic, how come the posts which you feel
compelled to respond to can fairly be described as such?
> > As did the antagonist-in-chief.
>
> I already noted that bisectional did, Bloggs. No need to repeat
> it.
No need to repeat anything, really.
grantco
Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
Michael Lockhart
news:FrEXc.13681$Bt5....@twister.socal.rr.com...
No, I asked you first. Your continuing evasion is noted.
Michael
tho...@antispam.ham
> <yawn>
What does your yawn have to do with OS/2, astronomy, or college
basketball, mellowcat?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>> And the below doesn't, Tholen?
>> Obviously it doesn't, Bloggs.
> Obviously, Tholen? I disagree - it's a pretty good indication.
It's a pretty good indication of your reading comprehension
problem, Bloggs.
>>> Classic inconsistency!
>> You're erroneously presupposing that what was below constitutes
>> antagonism, Bloggs.
> It antagonises, to the extent that many people feel compelled to
> respond.
If they feel compelled to respond, then perhaps they shouldn't have
posted the antagonistic, off-topic, or non sequitur material
involving me in the first place, Bloggs.
> If that's not antagonistic, how come the posts which you feel
> compelled to respond to can fairly be described as such?
Because I didn't do anything to instigate them, Bloggs.
>>> As did the antagonist-in-chief.
>> I already noted that bisectional did, Bloggs. No need to repeat
>> it.
> No need to repeat anything, really.
Then I can count on you to not repeat anything in the future,
eh Bloggs?
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>> Evasion noted.
>>> Evasion noted.
You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
playground behavior.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>>>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>>>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>> Evasion noted.
>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>> evasion, Lockhart.
Note: no response.
>>>>> David, what's with the sudden change in your posting? I thought you
>>>>> were
>>>>> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your
>>>>> digest.
>>>>> Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
>>>>> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection,
>>>>> it
>>>>> does appear to be you. What's up?
>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>> Evasion noted.
>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>> evasion, Lockhart.
> No, I asked you first.
Without specifying the relevance to classical music, Lockhart.
> Your continuing evasion is noted.
How ironic, coming from someone continuing to evade the question
about the relevance to classical music.
mc
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
tho...@antispam.ham
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
What do your zs have to do with astronomy, OS/2, or college
basketball, mellowcat?
mc
tho...@antispam.ham
> wha?... who?.... <yawn> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
What does any of that have to do with astronomy, OS/2, or college
basketball, mellowcat?
mc
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
tho...@antispam.ham
> who the... oh, it's noboby worthy of too much attention. <yawn>
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
Illogical, given that you're giving somebody enough attention to
warrant three irrelevant postings, mellowcat.
Now, do you intend to ever answer the question about what your
postings have to do with astronomy, OS/2, or college basketball,
mellowcat?
mc
grantco
>
> >>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>> Evasion noted.
>
> >> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> > Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> playground behavior.
No Tholen. You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
contrary. Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
grantco
> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>
> >> Peter J Ross writes:
>
> >>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
> >>>> dizzy wrote:
>
> >>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
> >>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>
> >>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>
> >> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>
> > Maybe step children do, step by step.
>
> Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
Good answer Tholen. Did you think that one up all by yourself?
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >> Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>
> >>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled and you
> >>> all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
> >>> repeatedly.
>
> >> I'm well aware of your trolling, Kennedy. How it looks to you is
> >> quite irrelevant; the facts are relevant.
>
> > What facts?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
Hardly. You are erroneously aasuming there are any "facts" involved, Tholen.
That is the only FACT that is relevant....
grantco
> Because I didn't do anything to instigate them, Bloggs.
Yup, that's Tholen. As innocent as a new born Tholey babe...
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
>> playground behavior.
> No Tholen.
What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
> contrary.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
purposes.
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>>> Peter J Ross writes:
>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>> dizzy wrote:
>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled
>>>>> "blatantly tholed" is the correct term.
>>>> Illogical; one does not blatantly endure something.
>>> Maybe step children do, step by step.
>> Maybe not, Flonkenstein.
> Good answer Tholen. Did you think that one up all by yourself?
What does your question have to do with any of the newsgroups to which
you've posted it, grantco?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>> Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>>>>> FACT: You morons are being blatently trolled and you
>>>>> all look liek red-headed step children being spanked
>>>>> repeatedly.
>>>> I'm well aware of your trolling, Kennedy. How it looks to you is
>>>> quite irrelevant; the facts are relevant.
>>> What facts?
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
> Hardly.
Then why are you asking a question for which there is already an
answer available in the newsgroup?
> You are erroneously aasuming there are any "facts" involved, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> That is the only FACT that is relevant....
Classic inconsistency, coming from someone who just finished stating
that there are no facts involved. But not unexpected from someone
like grantco, whose sole intent is to entertain himself by antagonizing
another.
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Because I didn't do anything to instigate them, Bloggs.
> Yup, that's Tholen.
Yes, I do tell the truth, grantco.
> As innocent as a new born Tholey babe...
What is a "Tholey babe", grantco, and what does it have to do with
astronomy, OS/2, or college basketball?
mc
mc
mc
mc
...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
mc
tho...@antispam.ham
> ....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
What does that have to do with astronomy, OS/2, or college basketball,
mellowcat?
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:27:55 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
>I see that you didn't
>answer the question, dizzy, choosing instead to evade it with an
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
How ironic.
>>>>> Aratzio writes:
>
>>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>>>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>
>>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>
>>>>> Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>>>>> claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
>
>>>> But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
>
>>> If you find your response to be lame, erroneous, and scripted,
>>> that's your problem, dizzy.
>
>> Classic thole.
>
>Non sequitur,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>given that oar pins are not involved, dizzy.
Irrelevant, tholen, given that I've never claimed that they were.
>>>>>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>
>>>>> You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
>
>>>> I've been discussing a kook, tholen.
>
>>> Discussing yourself, dizzy?
>
>> No, I've been discussing you, tholen.
>
>Illogical, dizzy.
Wrong again, tholen, given that you are a kook.
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>
>You're erroneously presupposing that I've been suffering from
>reading comprehension problems at all, dizzy.
I'm presupposing nothing, tholen. Your question "Discussing yourself,
Dizzy?", after I had written "FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.", is
evidence of your severe reading comprehension problems.
>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> Wrong again, tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
See above for substantiation, tholen.
dizzy
>Michael Lockhart writes:
>
>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
Classic thole, as expected from a poorly-written script.
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:55:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> dizzy writes:
>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:27:55 GMT, tholen tholed:
>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>>> Non sequitur.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part, tholen.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> I see that you didn't
>> answer the question, dizzy, choosing instead to evade it with an
>> unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> How ironic.
Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?
>>>>>> Aratzio writes:
>>>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>>>>>> bisecti...@yahoo.ca (b s) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I notice that you continue to coment on people not answering
>>>>>>>>>> questions, but don't answer the questions people ask you.
>>>>>>>>> FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.
>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> Classic avoidance of the issue at hand.
>>>>>> Illogical, given that noting the lack of substantiation for dizzy's
>>>>>> claim deals directly with dizzy's issue at hand.
>>>>> But with a lame (and erroneous) scripted response.
>>>> If you find your response to be lame, erroneous, and scripted,
>>>> that's your problem, dizzy.
>>> Classic thole.
>> Non sequitur,
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, dizzy.
>> given that oar pins are not involved, dizzy.
> Irrelevant, tholen, given that I've never claimed that they were.
Then why did you refer to them, dizzy?
>>>>>>> Have any k00ks to discuss, abusive x-poasting k00k?
>>>>>> You'll have to ask dizzy, Aratzio.
>>>>> I've been discussing a kook, tholen.
>>>> Discussing yourself, dizzy?
>>> No, I've been discussing you, tholen.
>> Illogical, dizzy.
> Wrong again, tholen, given that you are a kook.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I've been suffering from
>> reading comprehension problems at all, dizzy.
> I'm presupposing nothing, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Your question "Discussing yourself,
> Dizzy?", after I had written "FACT: Tholen is a hypocrite.", is
> evidence of your severe reading comprehension problems.
Evidence of your severe reading comprehension problems, dizzy, given
that I did not ask that question in response to your erroneous claim
of fact. Rather, it came in response to your remark that you have
been discussing a kook.
>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Wrong again, tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> See above for substantiation, tholen.
You're erroneously presupposing that there is any substantiation from
you above, dizzy.
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:46:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
> Classic thole, as expected from a poorly-written script.
What does an oar pin have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
basketball, or classical music, dizzy?
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >> Michael Lockhart writes:
>
> >>>>>> dizzy writes:
>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
> >>>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
> >>>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>
> >>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
>
> >> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> >>>>> going to reply to all the posts you considered antagonistic in your
> >>>>> digest.
> >>>>> Why the change to individual responses to specific posts? At first, I
> >>>>> thought it was someone pretending to be you, but on closer inspection, it
> >>>>> does appear to be you. What's up?
>
> >>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>> Evasion noted.
>
> >> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> > Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> playground behavior.
I see you've been "busy" Tholen.
yawn....
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>>>> Evasion noted.
>
> >>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> >>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> >> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> >> playground behavior.
>
> > No Tholen.
>
> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>
> > You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
> > contrary.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Yes, yours is.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> > Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>
> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
> purposes.
And your point is?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>> Evasion noted.
Non sequitur.
> yawn....
What does your yawn have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college basketball,
or classical music, grantco?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
>>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
>>>> playground behavior.
>>> No Tholen.
>> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
> Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
Classic hallucination.
>>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
>>> contrary.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Yes, yours is.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
>>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
>> purposes.
> And your point is?
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
mc
tho...@antispam.ham
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>
> >>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> >>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> >>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> >>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> >>>> playground behavior.
>
> >>> No Tholen.
>
> >> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
>
> > Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>
> Classic hallucination.
Yes, you are having one, Tholen..
>
> >>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
> >>> contrary.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Yes, yours is, Tholen..
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> > Yes, yours is.
>
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
Tag, you're it...
>
> >>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>
> >> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> >> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
> >> purposes.
>
> > And your point is?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
No. you have no point, obviously...
Just being polite.
But I do gotta ask what any of your responses have to do with
classical music, Hypocrite....?
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>>>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>>>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
>>>>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
>>>>>> playground behavior.
>>>>> No Tholen.
>>>> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
>>> Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>> Classic hallucination.
> Yes, you are having one, Tholen..
Illogical, given that I'm not the one seeing a similarity to Santa
Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco.
>>>>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
>>>>> contrary.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Yes, yours is, Tholen..
Non sequitur.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know by now if
you had better reading comprehension skills.
>>> Yes, yours is.
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Note: no response.
>>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
> Tag, you're it...
Non sequitur, but rather ironic.
>>>>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
>>>> purposes.
>>> And your point is?
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
> No.
Then why are you having such difficulty comprehending a rather obvious
point, grantco?
> you have no point, obviously...
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Just being polite.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> But I do gotta ask what any of your responses have to do with
> classical music, Hypocrite....?
That's what I've been asking you, grantco. I see that you still
haven't answered the question. No surprise there, really.
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:46:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
>>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>
>>>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
>> Classic thole, as expected from a poorly-written script.
>
>What does an oar pin have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
>basketball, or classical music, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >>>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> >>>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> >>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> >>>>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> >>>>>> playground behavior.
>
> >>>>> No Tholen.
>
> >>>> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
>
> >>> Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>
> >> Classic hallucination.
>
> > Yes, you are having one, Tholen..
>
> Illogical, given that I'm not the one seeing a similarity to Santa
> Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco.
The facts state otherwise, Tholen.
Maybe its your long white beard or your cute little cottonball tail?
>
> >>>>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
> >>>>> contrary.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Yes, yours is, Tholen..
>
> Non sequitur.
Mmmm, good one. How long did it take you to decide that original
response?
>
> > (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
> Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know by now if
> you had better reading comprehension skills.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >>> Yes, yours is.
>
> >> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
>
> > Tag, you're it...
>
> Non sequitur, but rather ironic.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >>>>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>
> >>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> >>>> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
> >>>> purposes.
>
> >>> And your point is?
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
No, merely asking the unnessary. I already know you have no point.
>
> > No.
>
> Then why are you having such difficulty comprehending a rather obvious
> point, grantco?
You erroneously assume I am.
Of course you'd know that if....
>
> > you have no point, obviously...
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Yes, your response is, Tholen.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> > Just being polite.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > But I do gotta ask what any of your responses have to do with
> > classical music, Hypocrite....?
>
> That's what I've been asking you, grantco. I see that you still
> haven't answered the question. No surprise there, really.
You need new material, Tholen...
Your entertainment potential continues to decline.
Here I though your "mission" was to stand up to antagonism. When the
fact is that you are now only trying to bore us...
grantco
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
> >>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
> >>>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>
> >>>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>
> >>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
> >>>>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
> >>>>>> playground behavior.
>
> >>>>> No Tholen.
>
> >>>> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
>
> >>> Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>
> >> Classic hallucination.
>
> > Yes, you are having one, Tholen..
>
> Illogical, given that I'm not the one seeing a similarity to Santa
> Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco.
The facts state otherwise, Tholen.
Maybe its your long white beard or your cute little cottonball tail?
>
> >>>>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
> >>>>> contrary.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Yes, yours is, Tholen..
>
> Non sequitur.
Mmmm, good one. How long did it take you to decide that original
response?
>
> > (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
> Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know by now if
> you had better reading comprehension skills.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >>> Yes, yours is.
>
> >> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
>
> > Tag, you're it...
>
> Non sequitur, but rather ironic.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> >>>>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>
> >>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> >>>> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
> >>>> purposes.
>
> >>> And your point is?
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
No, merely asking the unnessary. I already know you have no point.
>
> > No.
>
> Then why are you having such difficulty comprehending a rather obvious
> point, grantco?
You erroneously assume I am.
Of course you'd know that if....
>
> > you have no point, obviously...
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Yes, your response is, Tholen.
(see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
> > Just being polite.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > But I do gotta ask what any of your responses have to do with
> > classical music, Hypocrite....?
>
> That's what I've been asking you, grantco. I see that you still
> haven't answered the question. No surprise there, really.
You need new material, Tholen...
grantco
My you must really have time to waste in your life, Tholen....
yawn...
tho...@antispam.ham
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:16:35 GMT, tholen tholed:
How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>> dizzy writes:
>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:46:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>>>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>>>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>> Classic thole, as expected from a poorly-written script.
>> What does an oar pin have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
>> basketball, or classical music, dizzy?
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>>>>>>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>>>>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, your failure to answer my question does indeed constitute
>>>>>>>>>> evasion, Lockhart.
>>>>>>>>> Ah, there's more of that Tholen "playground" logic we all love....
>>>>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that any "playground" logic is
>>>>>>>> involved, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from someone using
>>>>>>>> playground behavior.
>>>>>>> No Tholen.
>>>>>> What makes you think there is no Tholen, grantco?
>>>>> Your obvious similarities to Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, Tholen...
>>>> Classic hallucination.
>>> Yes, you are having one, Tholen..
>> Illogical, given that I'm not the one seeing a similarity to Santa
>> Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco.
> The facts state otherwise, Tholen.
Where do the facts allegedly state that I see a similarity to
Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco?
> Maybe its your long white beard or your cute little cottonball tail?
You're erroneously presupposing the existence of a "long white
beard" or a "cute little cottonball tail", grantco.
>>>>>>> You are erroneously denying the obvious facts to the
>>>>>>> contrary.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Yes, yours is, Tholen..
>> Non sequitur.
> Mmmm, good one. How long did it take you to decide that original
> response?
What does your question have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
basketball, or classical music, grantco?
>>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
>> Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know by now if
>> you had better reading comprehension skills.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
You're still erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic",
grantco. Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know
by now if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>>>>> Yes, yours is.
>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
Non sequitur.
>> Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
>>>>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic", grantco.
>>> Tag, you're it...
>> Non sequitur, but rather ironic.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
You're still erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic",
grantco. Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know
by now if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>>>>>>> Of course you'd know that if you weren't a dumb ass...
>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>>>>>> argument and who has admitted to responding simply for entertainment
>>>>>> purposes.
>>>>> And your point is?
>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
> No, merely asking the unnessary. I already know you have no point.
Non sequitur.
>>> No.
>> Then why are you having such difficulty comprehending a rather obvious
>> point, grantco?
> You erroneously assume I am.
Incorrect, given your question above, grantco.
> Of course you'd know that if....
Having trouble finishing sentences, grantco?
>>> you have no point, obviously...
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Yes, your response is, Tholen.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
You're still erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic",
grantco. Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know
by now if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>>> Just being polite.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Note: no response.
>>> But I do gotta ask what any of your responses have to do with
>>> classical music, Hypocrite....?
>> That's what I've been asking you, grantco. I see that you still
>> haven't answered the question. No surprise there, really.
> You need new material, Tholen...
Non sequitur.
> Your entertainment potential continues to decline.
Irrelevant, grantco.
> Here I though your "mission" was to stand up to antagonism.
That's not even grammatical, grantco.
> When the fact is that you are now only trying to bore us...
Feel free to find something else to do, grantco.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>>>> No Tholen.
>>>> Classic hallucination.
>>> Yes, yours is, Tholen..
>> Non sequitur.
>>>>> Yes, yours is.
>> Note: no response.
>>> Tag, you're it...
>>>>> And your point is?
>>> No.
>>> Just being polite.
Classic repetition.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>>>>>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>>>>>>> Evasion noted.
>> Non sequitur.
Note: no response.
>>> yawn....
>> What does your yawn have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college basketball,
>> or classical music, grantco?
> My you must really have time to waste in your life, Tholen....
How ironic, coming from the person wasting time antagonizing another
purely for puerile entertainment purposes.
> yawn...
Frederick Shorts
Spoken like the true Davie Tholen.
>
> > yawn...
>
> What does your yawn have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college basketball,
> or classical music, grantco?
Why don't youz tell us, kook?
--
Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts
I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cyphe...@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.
Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/
I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver.com/news/top_stories/worldrecord.php
http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/
Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/
Frederick Shorts
Hay, kook! Is yer bot broken? We haven't seen a new digest for a while.
dizzy
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Yes, your response is, Tholen.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> (see how nice that playground logic you use works?)
>
>You're still erroneously presupposing that I use "playground logic",
>grantco.
Incorrect, tholen, given that your "playground logic", such as
intentionally misinterpreting what others say, is constantly on
display.
>Of course, I've told you that before, which you would know
>by now if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Illogical, tholen, given that you're a proven liar and fool, and what
you say cannot be trusted.
dizzy
How ironic.
dizzy
>
>> Mmmm, good one. How long did it take you to decide that original
>> response?
>
>What does your question have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
>basketball, or classical music, grantco?
Classic thole.
dizzy
>Note: still no response.
Note: Still kooky.
dizzy
>> Of course you'd know that if....
>
>Having trouble finishing sentences, grantco?
Classic stupidity. Most people would have realized that Grantco
intended the reader to finish the sentence, tholen.
dizzy
>> Here I though your "mission" was to stand up to antagonism.
>
>That's not even grammatical, grantco.
Kook.
dizzy
>> When the fact is that you are now only trying to bore us...
>
>Feel free to find something else to do, grantco.
Practice what you preach, tholen.
dizzy
>tho...@antispam.ham tholed:
>>
>> How ironic, coming from the person wasting time antagonizing another
>> purely for puerile entertainment purposes.
>
>Spoken like the true Davie Tholen.
The script.
>> > yawn...
>>
>> What does your yawn have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college basketball,
>> or classical music, grantco?
>
>
>Why don't youz tell us, kook?
Have you ever before encountered anyone as kooky as tholen?
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:16:35 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
Non sequitur.
>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:46:08 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
>>>>> Michael Lockhart writes:
>
>>>>>>> dizzy writes:
>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:42:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
>
>>>>>>> How does one allegedly endure when posting, dizzy?
>
>>>>>> Gee, I've never seen *that* exchange before.
>
>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Lockhart?
>
>>>> Classic thole, as expected from a poorly-written script.
>
>>> What does an oar pin have to do with astronomy, OS/2, college
>>> basketball, or classical music, dizzy?
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.