Chapt35 Star Evidence; Neighborhood of Star Age evidence #402 Atom Totality 4th ed
Archimedes Plutonium
Chapter 35 Star Evidence
Subject: best way to trashcan Nebular-dust-cloud is **neighborhood
star ages**
In the 3rd edition I was calling for a relook at all the zircon and
other aged crystals for
a lone crystal that was 10 billion years old.
But up along comes a news-flash about a bogus-assumption in
radioactive-dating.
So, then what followed was that "Why not all of radioactive dating as
false assumption"
If Dirac is correct, and Dirac was the preminent physicist of
the 20th century, far ahead of any rivals. Well, Dirac proposed
New Radioactivities
to logically fill in the Large Numbers Hypothesis.
So if the Cosmos is governed of the creation of matter and new
planets
and stars by
Dirac New Radioactivities. Well, we cannot use radioactivity for
any
kind of reliable Cosmic age parameter.
The creation of the uranium and lead and zircon crystals was created
by Dirac New Radioactivities.
So if the planet Jupiter in the far distant future starts to shine
like a star and be a companion
star to the Sun, are we still going to say that Jupiter in that
distant future is only several million
years old? No. For Jupiter was in existence for at least 4.6 billion
years before it started to
become a star.
AGE reckoning by NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS:
Here is a new way of age reckoning of stars: We measure the age of
a neighborhood of stars.
Alpha Centauri A which is 6 billion years old
Alpha Centauri B which is 6 billion years old
Alpha Centauri C which is 1 billion years old
Barnard's Star 10 billion years old
Lalande 21185 Star 10 billion years old
Sirius A
Sirius B binary stars of different ages
What the above shows the science of astronomy how silly it is for
anyone to believe
and accept a Nebular Dust Cloud theory for the origins of stars. The
99.9% of star
origins are by Dirac New Radioactivities, since any patch of sky of
neighboring stars all have a jumble of different ages. This jumble of
ages is
not a pattern for Nebular Dust Cloud creation and evolution.
The Nebular Dust Cloud people expect everyone else to believe that a
Nebular Dust Cloud that would form our Solar System danced and
waltzed
and threaded through the above star systems to make its cozy home in
the Solar System and then proceed to coalesce out into
our Sun and its planets.
Does anyone expect Nebular Dust Clouds to have the flexibility of
making a Solar System that is 4.5 billion years old and surrounding
it
to have stars systems of 10 billion years old.
Honestly, the most ardent Nebular Dust Cloud believer, how does he
manage to get out of that
silly predicament he is in?
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies