sci.astro.research

[[Mod. note -- This article arrived at my mailbox with some characters in the quotation garbled. I

In article <e8428e9c-69ca-4964-a87d-cd58e9f76ee8n@googlegroups.com>, Hasa= n Iqbal <hasan.

Op vrijdag 22 juli 2022 om 05:40:55 UTC+2 schreef Martin Brown: > On 20/07/2022 18:23, Nicolaas

On 10/07/2022 06:16, Nicolaas Vroom wrote: > Op donderdag 7 juli 2022 om 08:11:24 UTC+2 schreef

In article <62907f14.3473915609@news.aioe.org>, eric@flesch.org (Eric Flesch) writes: > On

Shapley probably said or wrote "No one trusts a model except the man who wrote it; everyone

[[Mod. note -- I apologise to the author and to sar readers for the long delay in posting this

On 3/22/22 6:31 AM, Lou wrote: > On Monday, 14 March 2022 at 20:47:39 UTC, Richard D. Saam wrote:

Reference tells us that the precessesion of Mercury *advances* over time. `The effect is small: just

[[Mod. note -- I apologise for the delay in processing this article, which arrived in the sar

--_000_VI1P192MB0478BD07FCF9F0A82B59D494E5299VI1P192MB0478EURP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=

It seems that my own preferences for public online discussion---usenet over blogs over Twitter---is

On Friday, 28 January 2022 at 22:12:50 UTC, Lou wrote: > On Thursday, 27 January 2022 at 04:19:12

In article <1c6aeebc-7004-44e6-9156-f65721e513e1n@googlegroups.com>, stargene <stargene@

On Wed, 05 Jan 2022, Phillip Helbig wrote: >The American Astronomical Society recently made all

In article <61b92469.400883390@news.aioe.org>, eric@flesch.org (Eric Flesch) writes: > On

In article <9d1f6a5a-c853-4577-a251-0ac24668a38en@googlegroups.com>, Jacob Navia <

The Million Quasars (MILLIQUAS) catalogue v7.3 has been released, which has all quasars published to

Hello, Google scholar merged two articles incorrectly, is there a way to fix this? best regards

After struggling for sometime, the Foundation for the Study of Cycles is now operating properly again

at https://www.sciencenews.org/article/gravitational-waves-ligo-first-black-hole-neutron-star-merger

Op woensdag 28 April 2021 om 18:31:27 UTC+2 schreef Nicolaas Vroom: > Sagittarius A* is considered

At bottom is my posting of 9-Jan-2019 wherein I described finding the lost quasar "0440-168

I have a question which I can't resolve online and perhaps you might answer if you have the time.

Le 10/03/2021 11:09, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) a écrit : > How well do we know the value

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:20:55 PDT, helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply))

Those who use Pan-STARRS data might bemoan the lack of a "u" band. There is a quick fix, of

In article <20210311041117.GA77258@iron.bkis-orchard.net>, Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.

I would appreciate it if someone who has published something in the European Physical Journal H via

Hi I have posted several times here about a "sea" of galaxies just beyond the limit of our