Guth Venus

[Brad Guth]

Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
“Guth Venus”, at 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

[Brad Guth]

Where's all the photographic expertise of this newsgroup?

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html

“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/2009/07/brad-guth-index.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

[Brad Guth]

On Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:29:39 PM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote:

What a pathetic joke this sci.astro.ccd.imaging has become.

Is there anyone here that can explain how CCD imagers can operate at 400+ K?

[Brad Guth]

Wow, what a pathetically dead ghost town this Usenet/newsgroup has turned into.

[Brad Guth]

On Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:29:39 PM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote:

GuthVenus, as well as our NASA Magellan Venus and Brad Guth are still being somewhat systematically mainstream shunned or even moderated so as to being excluded from mainstream media and whatever K-12s should get exposed to, as in having been topic/author stalked and otherwise getting subdued by way of continued media exclusion and banishment or simply ignored by some of these more context restrictive search engines like IE Bing, perhaps so as to minimize the public awareness and access to anything contributed by others outside of NASA that are having interesting stuff to say about this extremely nearby planet, as well as for matters of geoengineering and exploiting our moon seem to be getting unstackable in the internet search index status quo, meaning that we have to dig a bit deeper and keep turning over a few more rocks, because our stuff typically isn't sticking anywhere near the top or even kept on the first screen load of whatever the public typically gets to see when they search for anything of planet Venus, GuthVenus or those of our moon exploitation related topics.

This following link is just another passive infomercial example of how others have been gradually reviewing and applying their most conservative logic, physics and common deductive sense as to interpreting the best available science, by allowing for mostly old interpretations to resurface about the extremely nearby planet Venus makes for some relatively failsafe media context that really doesn't tell us all that much, if anything we didn't already know about.
http://www.insidescience.org/content/thirty-year-old-data-offers-new-view-venus/1536

The Firefox or Opera browsers each image-zoom perfectly good enough, though IE or Bing image zooming is a tad worse than either of those or Google Chrome, but that is just another obvious observation that most any 5th grader can easily see and verify for themselves. If you can not use Chrome or some other than IE browser, then perhaps most any basic free photo editing software app will do a whole lot better job than IE (even smartphones and especially iPhone can run photo zooming circles around IE11).

GuthVenus 1:1, plus the 10x resample/enlargement of the nasa.gov Magellan area of Venus in question
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/2009/07/brad-guth-index.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

It is quite entirely simple enough for even a dysfunctional 5th grader to just zoom to roughly a third up and center of the "mgm_c115s095_1.gif" image, and otherwise with PhotoShop or even most any free digital photo software can offer sufficient editing filters and contrasty dynamic range modifications that'll only help to visualize patterns without actually modifying a damn thing as to the original image. There are fancy photographic editing features and their somewhat complex names as for editing all of this, but basically the the GIF/JPG image formats can be easily zoomed or enlarged to suit, and contrast or sharpness boosted without distorting a damn thing. Some photographic editing doesn't allow for GIF formats, although once converted to JPG it becomes fully doable.

Most adults (even some of our most educated) are simply not capable of doing any of this image interpreting, and forget about the most experienced of our NASA, DARPA, JPL, ASU or even those of our official NIMA/NGA, because they have been entirely worthless if not pathetic from the very get-go.

If you or anyone you happen to know of can better interpret and explain as to what looks so community infrastructure worthy, and thereby better explain those unusual shapes and patterns as something entirely natural, please knock yourself out and tell us, by reporting as to how such natural topography and its active geology plus whatever erosions can manage to pull off any of this highly rational geometric looking pattern stuff. K-12s should go right ahead and ask their teacher(s) to explain it.

[Brad Guth]

On Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:29:39 PM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote:

Apparently this newsgroup is not about CCD imaging or much less about deductively interpreting squat.

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html

GuthVenus 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question:
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/2009/07/brad-guth-index.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/"Guth Venus",GuthVenus

[Brad Guth]

On Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:29:39 PM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote:

Isn't radar imaging good enough?

Perhaps there's not much new under the sun, unless you'd care to actually look at a wee bit of what the extremely nearby planet Venus has to offer, as hardly any significant sunlight is getting through to its geodynamically active surface, and especially of the GuthVenus site of such a mountainous and canyon terrain, as perhaps then you'll also notice that this one extremely nearby planet is simply like no other planet or moon by way of offering this substantial kind of structured scale and rational community of what interprets as considerable infrastructure, that had been created by some kind of a sufficiently advanced intelligence, or that of at least smarter than a typical 5th grader because most of our terrestrial 5th graders as having been mostly indoctrinated instead of educated are pretty much becoming our future lost cause generation of every child left behind, that can no longer independently think deductively for itself.