Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Age of solar system needs a fresh look
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Sam Wormley
Jan 1, 2010, 1:37:42 AM1/1/10
to
Age of solar system needs a fresh look
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_system_needs_a_fresh_look
Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
stage of formation.
Uncle Al
Jan 1, 2010, 12:08:23 PM1/1/10
to
"Historical estimates place the age at about 4.5 billion years"
"recent calculations place the age at more like 4.5672 billion years"
"this difference is important in understanding the infant solar
system"
A 1.5% relative increase overturning our "understanding" of anything
composed of conjecture is bullshit.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
BradGuth
Jan 1, 2010, 8:56:26 PM1/1/10
to
On Dec 31 2009, 10:37 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Age of solar system needs a fresh lookhttp://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_s...
> Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
> stage of formation.
> Age of solar system needs a fresh lookhttp://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/52306/title/Age_of_solar_s...
> Honed measurements show age overshot by amount significant to earliest
> stage of formation.
Too bad my paramagnetic basalt moon rocks don't agree with NASA's moon
rocks.
Wonder why our moon(Selene) is so much more radioactive than Earth.
Of course anything derived from the Sirius(B) nova would be newer and
thus more radioactive.
~ BG
0 new messages