I even did not star-test ist. So, can anybody tell me anything about
this instrument, e.g. f-ratio, expectable quality, approx. manufacturing
time etc.
Thank in advance
Chris
Sounds like you've got yourself a bargain there!
At one time, B&L were a very well-known SCT maker. If memory serves me
correctly, they were taken over by Celestron in the mid 1980s after which
Celestron killed the brand name.
A friend of mine has one of these scopes which he uses primarily for solar
observing - it's a very nice little portable telescope. As far as quality
goes, if it's been well looked-after it's probably pretty good - in the same
league as a telescope like the Celestron C90 certainly. It's probably f/10
or so.
In good condition it's worth perhaps around UKP 150 or so, so if you got it
at a bargain price you've done well!
Chris
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Marriott, SkyMap Software, UK (ch...@skymap.com)
Visit our web site at http://www.skymap.com
Astronomy software written by astronomers, for astronomers
I've done a little more research into this. B&L were a British telescope
maker, based in Dundee in Scotland. They were indeed taken over by
Celestron - Celestron kept some of their products, rebranding them with the
Celestron name, but scrapped the rest.
The company didn't long survive the takeover - the Dundee factory closed
shortly afterwards.
> Chris Marriott wrote in message
> <941398444.29962.0...@news.demon.co.uk>...
> >
> >At one time, B&L were a very well-known SCT maker. If memory serves me
> >correctly, they were taken over by Celestron in the mid 1980s after which
> >Celestron killed the brand name.
>
> I've done a little more research into this. B&L were a British telescope
> maker, based in Dundee in Scotland. They were indeed taken over by
> Celestron - Celestron kept some of their products, rebranding them with the
> Celestron name, but scrapped the rest.
>
> The company didn't long survive the takeover - the Dundee factory closed
> shortly afterwards.
Uh, Chris, you're a gold mine of misinformation today! Bausch & Lomb is
probably _the_ best known American optical company, still very much in
business! For more information, see their web site:
In the '80s, they took over an American telescope company, Criterion, which
had been around since the '50s. Criterion had tried to compete with Celestron
by producing SCTs, which were very cheaply made (cardboard tubes, no less!)
and have a very bad reputation. Bausch & Lomb tried marketing Crierion's SCTs
for a while, but gave up and went back to what they still sell today: cheap
department store scopes and a wide range of binoculars, which include cheap
junk (under the Bushnell brand name) and some very fine and expensive ones.
Although telescopes and binoculars are such a minor part of their current
operations they don't even get a mention on their web site.
Geoff Gaherty
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
http://members.home.net/ggaherty/
Amazingly, there are still a few accessories available
for this scope.
Here is the URL:
>I have bought a funny little scope on a flea market, that seems to be
>very rare here in Germany. Its a Bausch & Lomb Criterion 4000 (4" SCT)
>including a rifle-type finder scope and a 24mm kellner(?) eyepiece.
Bausch & Lomb bought Criterion about the time of the last visit of
Halley's Comet and closed the telescope factory in Danbury,
Connecticut, a few years later, so your telescope would have been made
about 1985-1988. Quality was regarded as less than that of Celestron
or Meade.
Christian Schims <ch.s...@express.de> wrote in message
news:381C83C4...@express.de...
> I have bought a funny little scope on a flea market, that seems to be
> very rare here in Germany. Its a Bausch & Lomb Criterion 4000 (4" SCT)
> including a rifle-type finder scope and a 24mm kellner(?) eyepiece.
>
> I even did not star-test ist. So, can anybody tell me anything about
> this instrument, e.g. f-ratio, expectable quality, approx. manufacturing
> time etc.
>
> Thank in advance
> Chris
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Hi Chris, I own one of these scopes and the optics are pretty good. It
is a much better built scope than the very toylike Meade
Etxs,(are you listening Meade?) I bought mine for about US $450.00 back
in 1982.
Bill
> At one time, B&L were a very well-known SCT maker. If memory
> serves me correctly, they were taken over by Celestron in the
> mid 1980s after which Celestron killed the brand name.
Ahhhh... and life goes on... the bigger fish devouring the lesser!
I remember the great Criterion RV-6 and RV-8 (Newtonian reflector)
Dynascopes from the Sixties... unbeatable! The company was just up the
road a piece from me, in Hartford, CT.
Feeling the "heat" from the newly launched Celestron 8 SCT (1970ish),
they scrambled to counter-attack with their own 8" SCT, the "DynaMax".
Apparently the mechanical and optical quality was not up to the
earlier "RV" days and they eventually were taken over by Baush & Lomb.
I'm unaware of the quality in the B&L/Criterion merged lines... this
was all happening after Uncle Sam decided I needed a change of
scenery (I avoided the draft by enlisting... Hah! right back at ya'!)
and I put my "focus" elsewhere (I've only recently migrated back to the
fold of "backyard" astronomers).
Oh well, sorry if I've rambled...
Clear Skies!
Paul
--
Paul Hyndman pghy...@yahoo.com Madison, CT
I do apologize - I phoned up my friend who owns the scope and he's the
person who gave me this seemingly incorrect information.
I wonder if he was thinking of some other company. Anyone know of any other
telescope manufacturer who fits the story I was told?
I'm copying this directly from the B&L ad in Astronomy May 1985. :-)
Mirror Dia. 4" f/12
Secondary Obstruction 35mm
FL 1200mm
Resolution Limit 1.1 arc/sec
max 30-240x
Near focus 15ft
Finderscope 4x
Enjoy,
Peter
>Christian,
>I'm copying this directly from the B&L ad in Astronomy May 1985. :-)
>Mirror Dia. 4" f/12
>Secondary Obstruction 35mm
>FL 1200mm
>Resolution Limit 1.1 arc/sec
>max 30-240x
>Near focus 15ft
>Finderscope 4x
I have one of these. Very portable. The optics are pretty good on a
star test, except for a little astigmatism. There is a bit of slack in the
mount. Otherwise a pretty good little scope, particularly with a better
eyepiece.
Dr P