Re: Star Trek Picard. Ode to Star Trek IV, woke style

[Ace Crysler]

On 4/3/22 23:33, RichA wrote:
> I figured 7 would have disabled the guy on the bus like Spock did in Star Trek IV. But that the old white guy just caved in an the endless reminders that (for some reason) 7 is homosexual is soooo 21st century.

7 homosexual theme, I noticed that too. Pretty subtle at first, but
getting bolder.

Save more $ if they film more in our time. And end up making more $ in
return. I don't think Patrick Stewart's been quite right since his
heart bypass surgery several years back. I first noticed differences in
people I love after having such surgery, now I notice changes in others.
A lot they never tell you about bypass risks. You end up finding out
yourself.

[RichA]

On Monday, 4 April 2022 at 12:59:12 UTC-4, Ace Crysler wrote:
> On 4/3/22 23:33, RichA wrote:
> > I figured 7 would have disabled the guy on the bus like Spock did in Star Trek IV. But that the old white guy just caved in an the endless reminders that (for some reason) 7 is homosexual is soooo 21st century.
>
> 7 homosexual theme, I noticed that too. Pretty subtle at first, but
> getting bolder.
>

Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in the Voyager series.

[RichA]

On Monday, 4 April 2022 at 12:59:12 UTC-4, Ace Crysler wrote:

Yes, medical procedures often have notable consequences they don't talk much about. For astronomers, cataract surgery or lasik can have negative consequences you don't hear
about in the advertising.

[Quadibloc]

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:

> Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in the Voyager series.

Her sexuality developed differently in different timelines? Hardly a problem... and, of
course, Star Trek has _always_ been progressive for its time.

John Savard

[Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha]

Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in
news:b8de53a2-38e9-47e6...@googlegroups.com:

> On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
>
>> Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in
>> the Voyager series.
>
> Her sexuality developed differently in different timelines?

That would conflict with the premise - universal on the left - that
sexuality isn't a choice, it's genetic and cannot be changed. Death
threaths have been common in that conversation.

> Hardly a problem... and, of course, Star Trek has _always_ been
> progressive for its time.
>

And utterly incompetent at continuity.

--
Terry Austin

Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
Lynn:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration
(May 2019 total for people arrested for entering the United States
illegally is over 132,000 for just the southwest border.)

Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

[Ace Crysler]

You mean Commander Chakotay, lol. Well, I really never expected her to
stay with him as I think there was a "crush" factor there, but not much
more than that. Plus they were out in deep space with few options.
Once they got home, they'd part ways. It would have been interesting to
at least learn what happened to both Picard and 7's colleagues over the
last decades. We already knew about Riker, Troy and Data, but what
about the others? Janeway, Chakotay, etc? Probably too much $ to try
bringing all of them in. Some of these folks may have had contracts
that if their names were even mentioned, they'd get a kickback I'm sure.
I think my biggest issue with last season was whether or not Picard is
truly Picard? Did the true Picard pass on and are we now left with a
souless android. Of course, they'd never touch that, not in this day
and age.

[Chris L Peterson]

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:33:34 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
<taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in
>news:b8de53a2-38e9-47e6...@googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
>>
>>> Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in
>>> the Voyager series.
>>
>> Her sexuality developed differently in different timelines?
>
>That would conflict with the premise - universal on the left - that
>sexuality isn't a choice, it's genetic and cannot be changed. Death
>threaths have been common in that conversation.

Developing differently doesn't mean it's a choice.

[Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha]

Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in
news:5v0p4h9cpi34spb4v...@4ax.com:

Lefites can justify anything, can't you? No matter how ridiculous and
contradictory.

[RichA]

On Tuesday, 5 April 2022 at 11:45:14 UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
>
> > Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in the Voyager series.
> Her sexuality developed

"Developed?" Like it was chosen?

[RichA]

On Tuesday, 5 April 2022 at 13:33:38 UTC-4, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha wrote:
> Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in
> news:b8de53a2-38e9-47e6...@googlegroups.com:
> > On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
> >
> >> Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in
> >> the Voyager series.
> >
> > Her sexuality developed differently in different timelines?
> That would conflict with the premise - universal on the left - that
> sexuality isn't a choice, it's genetic and cannot be changed.

Try telling it to Hollywood and the indoctrination machine there.

[Chris L Peterson]

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:10:11 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha

<taus...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in
>news:5v0p4h9cpi34spb4v...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:33:34 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>> Kujisalimisha <taus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in
>>>news:b8de53a2-38e9-47e6...@googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 1:02:30 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Continuity went to HELL. She ended up with Commander Riker in
>>>>> the Voyager series.
>>>>
>>>> Her sexuality developed differently in different timelines?
>>>
>>>That would conflict with the premise - universal on the left -
>>>that sexuality isn't a choice, it's genetic and cannot be
>>>changed. Death threaths have been common in that conversation.
>>
>> Developing differently doesn't mean it's a choice.
>>
>Lefites can justify anything, can't you? No matter how ridiculous and
>contradictory.

The fact that you think there is some kind of "left" to this just
reveals how incredibly stupid you are.

[Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha]

Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in

news:0oap4h5cq5521t2fb...@4ax.com:

I know you are, but what am I?

[Ace Crysler]

Don't know if you watched the final episode, but Seven planted a big
kiss on the girl she's been running around with. You/we were right!