Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
MEADE being acquired by Jinghua Optics & Electronics Co., Ltd.
95 views
Skip to first unread message
Thad Floryan
May 17, 2013, 11:37:01 PM5/17/13
to
News story:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/meade-instruments-corp-announces-merger-213327726.html
SEC Form 8-K (7 pages, 49kB):
http://www.meade.com/nasdaq/sec/Meade-Merger-Agreement.pdf
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/meade-instruments-corp-announces-merger-213327726.html
SEC Form 8-K (7 pages, 49kB):
http://www.meade.com/nasdaq/sec/Meade-Merger-Agreement.pdf
palsing
May 18, 2013, 12:08:17 AM5/18/13
to
Uncarollo2
May 18, 2013, 11:53:35 AM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 11:08 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, May 17, 2013 8:37:01 PM UTC-7, Thad Floryan wrote:
> > News story:
>
> >http://finance.yahoo.com/news/meade-instruments-corp-announces-merger...
> On Friday, May 17, 2013 8:37:01 PM UTC-7, Thad Floryan wrote:
> > News story:
>
>
> > SEC Form 8-K (7 pages, 49kB):
>
> >http://www.meade.com/nasdaq/sec/Meade-Merger-Agreement.pdf
>
> Scott Roberts comes full circle;>)
Mexico didn't work out, I guess.
> > SEC Form 8-K (7 pages, 49kB):
>
> >http://www.meade.com/nasdaq/sec/Meade-Merger-Agreement.pdf
>
> Scott Roberts comes full circle;>)
RichA
May 18, 2013, 1:08:52 PM5/18/13
to
lal_truckee
May 18, 2013, 4:48:35 PM5/18/13
to
On 5/18/13 10:08 AM, RichA wrote:
> They need a workforce will[sic] to, you know, work.
I know you say crap to see if you can get a rise out of us, so I usually
ignore you, but damn that's offensive to everyone.
It's offensive because it patently lies about Mexicans and people of
Mexican ancestry, and it's offensive because it implies the rest of us
are stupid enough to accept your lying misinformation.
I'm going back to ignoring you and your ilk.
> They need a workforce will[sic] to, you know, work.
I know you say crap to see if you can get a rise out of us, so I usually
ignore you, but damn that's offensive to everyone.
It's offensive because it patently lies about Mexicans and people of
Mexican ancestry, and it's offensive because it implies the rest of us
are stupid enough to accept your lying misinformation.
I'm going back to ignoring you and your ilk.
wsne...@hotmail.com
May 19, 2013, 8:58:17 AM5/19/13
to
Would you care to explain?
RichA
May 19, 2013, 9:24:28 AM5/19/13
to
On May 18, 4:48 pm, lal_truckee <lal_truc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
off-end...me."
Chris L Peterson
May 19, 2013, 10:54:05 AM5/19/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:58:17 -0700 (PDT), wsne...@hotmail.com wrote:
>It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
>Would you care to explain?
Because Rich's comment was offensive, and Uncarollo's was not.
>It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
>Would you care to explain?
Apparently Mexico _didn't_ work out as a way to keep costs down. That
has nothing to do with the Mexican work ethic.
RichA
May 19, 2013, 1:15:59 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 10:54 am, Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
is productivity.
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:58:17 -0700 (PDT), wsnel...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
> >Would you care to explain?
>
> Because Rich's comment was offensive, and Uncarollo's was not.
>
> Apparently Mexico _didn't_ work out as a way to keep costs down. That
> has nothing to do with the Mexican work ethic.
Sure it does. Wages are 1/3 the U.S. or less and the only thing left
> >It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
> >Would you care to explain?
>
> Because Rich's comment was offensive, and Uncarollo's was not.
>
> Apparently Mexico _didn't_ work out as a way to keep costs down. That
> has nothing to do with the Mexican work ethic.
is productivity.
wsne...@hotmail.com
May 19, 2013, 1:19:50 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 10:54 am, Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:58:17 -0700 (PDT), wsnel...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
> >Would you care to explain?
>
> Because Rich's comment was offensive, and Uncarollo's was not.
>
> Apparently Mexico _didn't_ work out as a way to keep costs down. That
> has nothing to do with the Mexican work ethic.
There was no mention of the factory in Mexico in either of the two
> >It is interesting that you flamed RichA but gave Uncarollo a pass.
> >Would you care to explain?
>
> Because Rich's comment was offensive, and Uncarollo's was not.
>
> Apparently Mexico _didn't_ work out as a way to keep costs down. That
> has nothing to do with the Mexican work ethic.
links posted. Presumably, the plant is still in operation and if so,
will perhaps remain in operation after the merger. It undoubtedly cut
labor costs, which actually tend to be lower in Mexico than in China.
I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
RichA's. Perhaps your reading comprehension is too poor for you to
see Uncarollo's statement as a gratuitous slap at something (Meade
plant in Mexico) of which he apparently disapproves.
Chris L Peterson
May 19, 2013, 5:25:26 PM5/19/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT), wsne...@hotmail.com wrote:
>I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
>RichA's.
Of course you do. As a sociopath, you have no concept of offensive
>I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
>RichA's.
language or behavior. That's one of the markers of a sociopath.
wsne...@hotmail.com
May 19, 2013, 7:54:31 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 5:25 pm, Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
Uncarollo brought up the subject and stated that "Mexico didn't work
out," which is clearly an unwarranted and insulting statement on his
part. After a moment's reflection, one would conclude that Irvine
"didn't work out" either. I tend to believe that a company's problems
lie with management, not labor.
I certainly have a concept of your offensive language and behavior,
and your general lack of etiquette. Maybe you should educate yourself
as to what a sociopath is before slinging the term around so freely.
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT), wsnel...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
> >RichA's.
>
> Of course you do. As a sociopath, you have no concept of offensive
> language or behavior. That's one of the markers of a sociopath.
There was absolutely no reason to mention Mexico wrt to the merger.
> >I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
> >RichA's.
>
> Of course you do. As a sociopath, you have no concept of offensive
> language or behavior. That's one of the markers of a sociopath.
Uncarollo brought up the subject and stated that "Mexico didn't work
out," which is clearly an unwarranted and insulting statement on his
part. After a moment's reflection, one would conclude that Irvine
"didn't work out" either. I tend to believe that a company's problems
lie with management, not labor.
I certainly have a concept of your offensive language and behavior,
and your general lack of etiquette. Maybe you should educate yourself
as to what a sociopath is before slinging the term around so freely.
David Staup
May 19, 2013, 9:48:12 PM5/19/13
to
offensive...they just don't care...
Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
kinda like obama
Davoud
May 19, 2013, 11:30:29 PM5/19/13
to
David Staup:
an irrational hatred could itself be a sign of sociopathy, do you?
--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.
usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
> not....a sociopath has no conscience...they KNOW what they do is
> offensive...they just don't care...
>
> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>
>
> kinda like obama
You don't suppose that fabricating lies about someone for which one has
> offensive...they just don't care...
>
> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>
>
> kinda like obama
an irrational hatred could itself be a sign of sociopathy, do you?
--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.
usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
Message has been deleted
wsne...@hotmail.com
May 20, 2013, 6:08:28 AM5/20/13
to
On May 19, 9:48 pm, David Staup <dst...@charter.net> wrote:
a few years ago? I suppose that if the populace grew ever used to the
idea of reporting dissent to the government then things like the
snitch site would begin to seem perfectly normal (and "non-
sociopathic.")
> On 5/19/2013 4:25 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:> On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT), wsnel...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
> >> RichA's.
>
> > Of course you do. As a sociopath, you have no concept of offensive
> > language or behavior. That's one of the markers of a sociopath.
>
> not....a sociopath has no conscience...they KNOW what they do is
> offensive...they just don't care...
>
> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>
> kinda like obama
Did you ever happen to visit the "snitch site" that existed on the Web
>
> >> I interpret Uncarollo's message to be every bit as offensive as
> >> RichA's.
>
> > Of course you do. As a sociopath, you have no concept of offensive
> > language or behavior. That's one of the markers of a sociopath.
>
> not....a sociopath has no conscience...they KNOW what they do is
> offensive...they just don't care...
>
> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>
> kinda like obama
a few years ago? I suppose that if the populace grew ever used to the
idea of reporting dissent to the government then things like the
snitch site would begin to seem perfectly normal (and "non-
sociopathic.")
David Staup
May 20, 2013, 7:54:01 AM5/20/13
to
On 5/19/2013 10:30 PM, Davoud wrote:
> David Staup:
>> not....a sociopath has no conscience...they KNOW what they do is
>> offensive...they just don't care...
>>
>> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
>> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
>> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
>> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>>
>>
>> kinda like obama
>
> You don't suppose that fabricating lies about someone for which one has
> an irrational hatred could itself be a sign of sociopathy, do you?
>
Jesus...google sociopath you idiot ...what you or I suppose has nothing
> David Staup:
>> not....a sociopath has no conscience...they KNOW what they do is
>> offensive...they just don't care...
>>
>> Failure of Conformity to Social Norms
>> Total disregard for certain set norms by society is a symptom that will
>> easily give a sociopath away. In fact, they often prefer to tweak and
>> twist the 'rules' to suit themselves and their fancies.
>>
>>
>> kinda like obama
>
> You don't suppose that fabricating lies about someone for which one has
> an irrational hatred could itself be a sign of sociopathy, do you?
>
to do with it.
Chris L Peterson
May 20, 2013, 12:13:50 PM5/20/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 20:48:12 -0500, David Staup <dst...@charter.net>
wrote:
>kinda like obama
I kinda like Obama, too. I'm surprised you do, however.
wrote:
>kinda like obama
I kinda like Obama, too. I'm surprised you do, however.
David Staup
May 20, 2013, 12:32:23 PM5/20/13
to
as I said sociopath, kinda like obama
snicker
and not just any snicker...a condescending snicker and add to that a smirk!
David Staup
May 23, 2013, 9:34:02 AM5/23/13
to
On 5/20/2013 11:13 AM, Chris L Peterson wrote:
David Staup
May 25, 2013, 7:15:56 AM5/25/13
to
On 5/20/2013 11:13 AM, Chris L Peterson wrote:
RichA
May 26, 2013, 12:21:26 AM5/26/13
to
politically-correct (to the detriment of the TRUTH in most cases) than
the other.
David Staup
May 26, 2013, 8:22:04 AM5/26/13
to
pussys too
not a peep about NASA abandoning the climate cause and now proposing a
manned mission ....NOT ROBOTIC chrissy poo....a manned mission
oh the horror
fuckin dumbass liberal idiot
name calling chrissy poo..... sound familiar?
RMOLLISE
Jun 1, 2013, 11:31:26 AM6/1/13
to
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 12:08:52 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
>
> They need a workforce will to, you know, work.
I check into s.a.a. every once in a while to see if anything has changed. I have my answer. See y'all next year. LOL
>
> They need a workforce will to, you know, work.
W. eWatson
Jun 1, 2013, 1:10:27 PM6/1/13
to
I think I have this right. 6000+ businesses in the USA are owned by the
Chinese. That from news stories recently from the attempt by a Chinese
company to buy a pig slaughter house in S. Calif.
Chinese. That from news stories recently from the attempt by a Chinese
company to buy a pig slaughter house in S. Calif.
wsne...@hotmail.com
Jun 8, 2013, 8:04:05 AM6/8/13
to
relative costs of labor in different countries, or on the relative
importance of labor and management, you chose to add to the noise.
0 new messages