'This is not science fiction,' say scientists pushing for 'neuro-rights'

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

Genius John Hall will ACCUSE this columnist Avi Asher Shapiro and
publisher that they are SCHIZOPHRENIC PARANOIDS, because a STRANGER on
rsc, who is actually part of the Deep State CIA NSA MI6 MI5 ASIS ASIO
Psychopaths, SAID SO.

John Hall, RH and other NAIVE uksc'ers actually RESPONDED to the VERY
PSYCHOPATH who changes his name every few days to Bill Pollock, Bobby
Smith, Muriel Mckay, Loughall Tomartyr, Sunil, Sethi, Dhruv etc with the
same email address tsp...@gmail.com ACTUALLY "chipped them with Mind
Control Nanobots" and LINKED them to NSA EVIL AI HIVE Global Information
Grid and REMOTELY OPERATING them like fucking PUPPETS.

This columnist DIDN'T KNOW that the EVIL Shadow US Govt CIA NSA MI6 MI5
ASIS ASIO Psychopaths "already" REVERSE ENGINEERED human brain by the
1970s and ever since CHIPPING and LINKING their brains to NSA EVIL AI
HIVE Global Information Grid and REMOTELY OPERATING millions of Humans
like PUPPETS.


=============================================================================



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-tech-rights/this-is-not-science-fiction-say-scientists-pushing-for-neuro-rights-idUSKBN28D3HK?feedType=mktg&feedName=technologyNews&WT.mc_id=Partner-Google

'This is not science fiction,' say scientists pushing for 'neuro-rights'


(Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Scientific advances from deep brain
stimulation to wearable scanners are making manipulation of the human
mind increasingly possible, creating a need for laws and protections to
regulate use of the new tools, top neurologists said on Thursday.

A set of “neuro-rights” should be added to the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights adopted by the United Nations, said Rafael Yuste, a
neuroscience professor at New York’s Columbia University and organizer
of the Morningside Group of scientists and ethicists proposing such
standards.

Five rights would guard the brain against abuse from new technologies -
rights to identity, free will and mental privacy along with the right of
equal access to brain augmentation advances and protection from
algorithmic bias, the group says.

“If you can record and change neurons, you can in principle read and
write the minds of people,” Yuste said during an online panel at the Web
Summit, a global tech conference.

“This is not science fiction. We are doing this in lab animals
successfully.”

Neurotechnology has the potential to alter the mechanisms that make
people human, so putting it in a “human rights framework” is
appropriate, he added.

The U.N.’s declaration, which laid the groundwork for international
human rights, was adopted after World War II in 1948.

A need for neuro-rights will grow as the developments become more
popular and commercialized, the neurologists said.

Many of these technologies so far have applications in medicine, such as
brain-computer interfaces helping patients move prosthetic limbs or
communicate after a brain injury.

But those neurotechnologies increasingly will be available outside of
the medical context, said John Krakauer, a professor of neurology and
neuroscience at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland.

“Deep down what people want is consumer technologies,” he said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved deep brain
stimulation procedures - implanting electrodes in the brain - to treat a
range of disorders from Parkinson’s disease to epilepsy.

Some private companies sell wearable devices to monitor brain activity
that claim to be capable of tracking moods and emotions.

Krakauer compared the latest neurotechnologies to advances such as
social media and mass advertising that can be utilized to alter people’s
preferences without their expressed consent.

“What’s changed now is that the tech can get under the skull and get at
our neurons,” he said.

Globally, a number of legal measures are aimed at these advances,
including legislation in Chile that if passed would be the first law to
establish neuro-rights for citizens.

In November, the Spanish government proposed new rules for regulating
artificial intelligence that includes specific provisions for
neuro-rights, Yuste said.

“This is the first time in history that humans can have access to the
contents of people’s minds,” he said.

“We have to think very careful about how we are going to bring this into
society.”