Noonan 13 letter difference of HACNS1 and how many for Neanderthal genome? #173 Rockthrowing theory
Archimedes Plutonium
switches of what used to be called
junk DNA. But in this program which could have been
titled "DNA switches" as an alternative title we see that
a mutation or mistake of just one single letter can make a vast
difference.
In the case of a chimp brain and a human brain there are two letters
missing to allow the brain to grow larger as the "Stedman segment"
elucidated.
So the question is, when Svante Paabo working in
Germany of the Neanderthal genome as to whether the
HACNS1 sequence is identical for both humans and
Neanderthal? The FOXP2 sequence was found to be
identical in both Neanderthal and humans, but will the
HACNS1 be identical?
If the Rockthrowing theory is true in its full magnitude, then the
Neanderthal HACNS1 will differ from the human sequence. The human
sequence of HACNS1, according to Noonan differed from chimpanzee by 13
letters. All it takes for Neanderthal is a difference of
just one letter compared to the human sequence to
satisfy the Rockthrowing theory.
So if and when the Paabo team report the Neanderthal
genome and if the Neanderthal varies by just one single letter in the
HACNS1 sequence from that of humans, is proof that Neanderthal was a
"not so good a thrower" and that CroMagnon stonethrowed Neanderthal
into extinction.
The Rockthrowing theory says that the difference between apes and
humans was a long chain of events all started by an ancient ape that
loved to throw rocks and stones. This lead to bipedalism and
eventually to
a large brain. And the genetics coupled with the fossil record can
prove it.
So, I maybe the single most anxious person in the world on news of the
Neanderthal genome of its HACNS1 sequence. Does it differ from
humanity by at
least 1 letter?
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Ace0f_5pades
pass--- thats too hard
Lee Olsen
"Thus, recent analyses have exposed the
methodological weaknesses of earlier
studies indicating that the Neanderthals
were deficient in their precision
capabilities."
It then follows that if Neandertal ancestors
were using weight forward javelin-like throwing
spears, then throwing, as precision grip, would
have been just as developed by 400 kya as it
is now.
Robin Dennell, "The World's Oldest Spears,"
Nature 385 (Feb. 27, 1997), p. 767-768
Uncle Al
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y9bbtvu
>
> "Thus, recent analyses have exposed the
> methodological weaknesses of earlier
> studies indicating that the Neanderthals
> were deficient in their precision
> capabilities."
"Thus, future analyses will expose the methodological randomness of
earlier studies, concurrent studies, and following studies indicating
that the Neanderthals were deficient, proficient, efficient,
effulgent, and tenebrous in their ISO 900x documentation
capabilities."
Centuries of shredded forests supported voluminus punctilious
scholarly eructations of the mastery of light and shadow evinced by
Michelangelo on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. After centuries of candle
soot were removed it looked like a brightly colored comic book. Vote
with the stupid! How can so many people be wrong?
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
Lee Olsen
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if and when the Paabo team report the Neanderthal
> genome and if the Neanderthal varies by just one single letter in the
> HACNS1 sequence from that of humans, is proof that Neanderthal was a
> "not so good a thrower" and that CroMagnon stonethrowed Neanderthal
> into extinction.
Nor is there one iota of evidence that Cro-Magnons ever saw a
Neanderthal, let alone
stoned them to death.
Adam
>Centuries of shredded forests supported voluminus punctilious
>scholarly eructations of the mastery of light and shadow evinced by
>Michelangelo on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. After centuries of candle
>soot were removed it looked like a brightly colored comic book. Vote
>with the stupid! How can so many people be wrong?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_of_the_Sistine_Chapel_frescoes#Eyes
the eyes appear in many instances to have been painted buon fresco.
Wherever they have not been painted buon fresco but added a secco,
they have been removed by the restorers.
It seems that some elements of the paintings were removed by mistake.
--
Adam
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16224-neanderthal-genome-already-giving-up-its-secrets.html
Half the Neanderthal genome has been decoded and the rest should be
sequenced by year's end, a scientist involved in the project told a
human evolution conference last week.
Researchers will roll out a rough draft of the Neanderthal nuclear
genome after their sequencers have read every letter in the genome on
average once - "1x coverage" in genomics speak.
--- end quoting ---
Well, good, I much rather wait for an accurate report rather than a
rushed report
with mistakes. Because who knows when another Neanderthal sample in
the future would
be tested for confirmation of the current testing.
It looks like the Paabo team is especially keen on removing any human
contamination
in the sample. Which is very much encouraging.