Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Apology for marking incorrect HC boundary in meteorite

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Dec 27, 2009, 6:14:56 AM12/27/09
to
Apology for marking incorrect HC boundary in meteorite

The following figure was marked with incorrect boundary of Haversian
canal in a meteorite:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691434732&p=66

To make up for my mistake, I carefully studied again 20 micrographs of
the same area and marked on the following micrographs 15 red blood
cells, 5 cross sections of blood vessels and 3 Haversian canals—all
fossilized. This time no mistake, although these organisms of
meteorite have been much more heavily distorted than Earth/Mars
fossils.
Figure 1: 2000X image of 6 RBC, 3 BV, 2 HC
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94

Figure 2: 4000X image of 9 RBC, 2 BV, 1 HC
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443716&p=95

jerry warner

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 12:27:45 AM12/29/09
to

I dont see any "red blood cells" (or cells of any kind)
in your photos. Shame on me - I must be blind.
 

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 5:16:09 AM12/29/09
to
On 12月29日, 下午1時27分, jerry warner <jwar...@mchsi.com> wrote:
> Wretch Fossil wrote:
> > Apology for marking incorrect HC boundary in meteorite
>
> > The following figure was marked with incorrect boundary of Haversian
> > canal in a meteorite:
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691434732&p=66
>
> > To make up for my mistake, I carefully studied again 20 micrographs of
> > the same area and marked on the following micrographs 15 red blood
> > cells, 5 cross sections of blood vessels and 3 Haversian canals�all

> > fossilized. This time no mistake, although these organisms of
> > meteorite have been much more heavily distorted than Earth/Mars
> > fossils.
> > Figure 1: 2000X image of 6 RBC, 3 BV, 2 HC
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94
>
> > Figure 2: 4000X image of 9 RBC, 2 BV, 1 HC
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443716&p=95
>
> I dont see any "red blood cells" (or cells of any kind)
> in your photos. Shame on me - I must be blind.
It's all right, if you can see one here:http://www.wretch.cc/album/
show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99

- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 5:17:55 AM12/29/09
to
This one:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/
show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99

>
> - 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
>
>
>
>
> > - 顯示被引用文字 -- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 5:19:34 AM12/29/09
to

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99

jerry warner

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 11:49:05 PM12/29/09
to
 

Wretch Fossil wrote:

On 12�29�, ��6�17�, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12�29�, ��6�16�, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> > On 12�29�, ��1�27�, jerry warner <jwar...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> > > Wretch Fossil wrote:
> > > > Apology for marking incorrect HC boundary in meteorite
>
> > > > The following figure was marked with incorrect boundary of Haversian
> > > > canal in a meteorite:
> > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691434732&p=66
>
> > > > To make up for my mistake, I carefully studied again 20 micrographs of
> > > > the same area and marked on the following micrographs 15 red blood

> > > > cells, 5 cross sections of blood vessels and 3 Haversian canals�all

> > > > fossilized. This time no mistake, although these organisms of
> > > > meteorite have been much more heavily distorted than Earth/Mars
> > > > fossils.
> > > > Figure 1: 2000X image of 6 RBC, 3 BV, 2 HC
> > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94
>
> > > > Figure 2: 4000X image of 9 RBC, 2 BV, 1 HC
> > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443716&p=95
>
> > > I dont see any "red blood cells" (or cells of any kind)
> > > in your photos. Shame on me - I must be blind.
>
> > It's all right, if you can see one here:http://www.wretch.cc/album/
> > show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
>
> This one:http://www.wretch.cc/album/
> show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99

>
>
>
>
>
> > - ��被���� -
>
> > > - 顯示被���� -- ��被���� -
>
> > - 顯示被���� -- ��被���� -
>
> > - 顯示被���� -- ��被���� -
>
> - 顯示被���� -- ��被���� -
>
> - 顯示被���� -

Are you OK? Didnt mean to cause a stroke or something -
should we call 911? why do I come here!?
 
 
 
 
 

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 9:25:51 PM12/30/09
to
On 12月30日, 下午12時49分, jerry warner <jwarn...@mchsi.com> wrote:
> Wretch Fossil wrote:
> > On 12月29æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ6時17分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12月29æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ6時16分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > > On 12月29æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ1時27分, jerry warner <jwar...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Wretch Fossil wrote:
> > > > > > Apology for marking incorrect HC boundary in meteorite
>
> > > > > > The following figure was marked with incorrect boundary of Haversian
> > > > > > canal in a meteorite:
> > > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691434732&p=66
>
> > > > > > To make up for my mistake, I carefully studied again 20 micrographs of
> > > > > > the same area and marked on the following micrographs 15 red blood
> > > > > > cells, 5 cross sections of blood vessels and 3 Haversian canals�all
> > > > > > fossilized. This time no mistake, although these organisms of
> > > > > > meteorite have been much more heavily distorted than Earth/Mars
> > > > > > fossils.
> > > > > > Figure 1: 2000X image of 6 RBC, 3 BV, 2 HC
> > > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94
>
> > > > > > Figure 2: 4000X image of 9 RBC, 2 BV, 1 HC
> > > > > >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443716&p=95
>
> > > > > I dont see any "red blood cells" (or cells of any kind)
> > > > > in your photos. Shame on me - I must be blind.
>
> > > > It's all right, if you can see one here:http://www.wretch.cc/album/
> > > > show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
>
> > > This one:http://www.wretch.cc/album/
> > > show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
>
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
>
> > > > - éš±è— è¢«å¼•ç”¨æ–‡å­— -
>
> > > > > - 顯示被引用文字 -- éš±è— è¢«å¼•ç”¨æ–‡å­— -
>
> > > > - 顯示被引用文字 -- éš±è— è¢«å¼•ç”¨æ–‡å­— -
>
> > > > - 顯示被引用文字 -- éš±è— è¢«å¼•ç”¨æ–‡å­— -
>
> > > - 顯示被引用文字 -- éš±è— è¢«å¼•ç”¨æ–‡å­— -

>
> > > - 顯示被引用文字 -
>
> Are you OK? Didnt mean to cause a stroke or something -
> should we call 911? why do I come here!?- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -

I'm still alive. Call Obama,quick,I have found an ET at:

Figure 4: 4000X SEM labelled for blood vessel/Haversian canal remains
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691487192&p=103


0 new messages