Unambiguous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
Wretch Fossil
Someone claimed my evidences are ambiguous concerning fossils found in
meteorites. So, I took out my prettiest meteorite, imaged it for
scarlet blood vessel remains and displayed them below. You decide if
they show rock minerals.
Figure 1: Meteorite 6
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427559&p=87
Figure 2: 100X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427560&p=88
Figure 3: 200X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427565&p=89
Figure 4: 500X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427563&p=90
Additional figures:
200X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427566&p=91
60X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427568&p=92
60X another BV near stikcer
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427567&p=93
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Unambiquous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
>
The only unambiguous fossilized blood vessels are the ones going to
your cerebral cortex.
Wretch Fossil
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:05:30 -0800 (PST), Wretch Fossil
>
> >Unambiquous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
>
> The only unambiguous fossilized blood vessels are the ones going to
> your cerebral cortex.
Deny this if you can:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94
Have you ever studied any fossilized remains of RBC, BV, HC?
Do you know that some osteocyte lacunae in meteorites got lost as they
experienced compression/twisting in their travels, unlike fossils
buried in Mars or Earth?
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
You remain delusional.
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
Are these delusional sightings?
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12??28??, ?U??3??34??, rwalker <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:32:36 -0800 (PST), Wretch Fossil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On 12?24?, ??11?07?, rwalker <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:05:30 -0800 (PST), Wretch Fossil
>>
>> >> <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >Unambiquous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
>>
>> >> The only unambiguous fossilized blood vessels are the ones going to
>> >> your cerebral cortex.
>>
>> >Deny this if you can:
>> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691443717&p=94
>>
>> >Have you ever studied any fossilized remains of RBC, BV, HC?
>> >Do you know that some osteocyte lacunae in meteorites got lost as they
>> >experienced compression/twisting in their travels, unlike fossils
>> >buried in Mars or Earth?
>>
>> You remain delusional. - ?????Q???????r -
>>
>> - ?????Q???????r -
>Are these delusional sightings?
>http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691451929&p=99
Frankly, yes.
Wretch Fossil
posts in talk.origins four years ago.
A frank comment please on this image:
Figure 4: 4000X SEM labelled for blood vessel/Haversian canal remains
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691487192&p=103
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have always been frank with you. Your material is garbage. There
is nothing in any of the material that you present that in any way
resembles any organic structure in any way whatsoever.
I cannot be any more frank than that.
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
I am talking about fossilized cells/tissues, etc. You may know very
much about living cells, tissues, etc.
But you don't even know how many kinds of shapes/colors a red blood
cell could fossilize into. So, you don't know what you are talking
about concerning my images. If they are garbages, what garbages are
they? Rock minerals? Do you know anything about minerals?
Let me say publicly that you are EVIL.
I won't take back those words. When I presented my very first images
of Ed's "rocks" in talk.origins about four years, you knew they showed
organic matter, as you were an anatomy professor/associate professor.
But you took advantage of my ignorance then of biology. You will be
repaid for that beter sooner on earth than later in hell.
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
To substantiate my claim about Prof. Robert Walker's evilness, I list
the following image, which is something like what I mentioned about.
I never claimed any LIVING RBC. You don't know, and you don't want to
know, fossilized cells, but you are evil enough to mislead many people
into believing my photos show rock minerals instead of fossilized
cells/organism.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=23&f=1438803358&p=8
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I cannot be any more frank than that.- ?????Q???????r -
>>
>> - ?????Q???????r -
>
>I am talking about fossilized cells/tissues, etc. You may know very
>much about living cells, tissues, etc.
>But you don't even know how many kinds of shapes/colors a red blood
>cell could fossilize into. So, you don't know what you are talking
>about concerning my images. If they are garbages, what garbages are
>they? Rock minerals? Do you know anything about minerals?
>
>Let me say publicly that you are EVIL.
Oh well, I'd rather be evil than nuts.
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
The editor in chief of Astrobiology journal said my micrographs show
"definitive evidence of terrestrial life" (she thought it shows
contaminants of Earth life, just as an editor of Nature magazine
thought) while you just called them nuts. Does the following image
show nuts?
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691509528&p=113
rwalker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh well, I'd rather be evil than nuts.- ?????Q???????r -
>>
>> - ?????Q???????r -
>The editor in chief of Astrobiology journal said my micrographs show
>"definitive evidence of terrestrial life" (she thought it shows
>contaminants of Earth life, just as an editor of Nature magazine
>thought) while you just called them nuts. Does the following image
>show nuts?
>http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691509528&p=113
No. It's evidence that you are nuts.
Wretch Fossil
If the marked material is not mineral, then it must be organic in
origin, for the world is composed of five kingdoms of minerals,
plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.
It's as simple as that.
mclark
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
What the hell's happened to this NG, anyway? Overflowing with Ed
Conrad and his certifiable camp follower.
Ed? Please go back to Pennsylvania and take this chandelier swinger
with yas....do yourself and everybody
else a big favor.
RichTravsky
> >
> > - ��ܳQ�ޥΤ�r -
> The editor in chief of Astrobiology journal said my micrographs show
Lie. Her name ->
> "definitive evidence of terrestrial life" (she thought it shows
> contaminants of Earth life, just as an editor of Nature magazine
Lie. Their name ->
RichTravsky
Still waiting.
> > "definitive evidence of terrestrial life" (she thought it shows
> > contaminants of Earth life, just as an editor of Nature magazine
>
> Lie. Their name ->
Still waiting.
RichTravsky
RichTravsky
Re: Unambiguous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
Date:
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:31:19 -0700
From:
RichTravsky <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com>
Organization:
Banzai Institute
Newsgroups:
sci.anthropology.paleo
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12