Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Best evidence for Out of Asia?

51 views
Skip to first unread message

I Envy JTEM

unread,
Dec 26, 2021, 3:30:43 AM12/26/21
to

http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/2-1-million-year-old-stone-tools-china-06192.html

They don't say it here but they actually spelled it out in
a documentary I saw previously on Youtube, one that
took on the Chinese & French perspective...

https://youtu.be/hP75JnDwZ-o

Americans aren't allowed to say this stuff.

Anyhow, they speculated that the early human that left
these tools were what gave rise to "Peking Man."

They're also FURTHER AWAY from Africa than was the
Homo georgicus BUT OLDER. So moving *away* from
Africa they're getting older...

But the real clincher here, and something they don't say
in this cite but they did in the documentary, is that these
are Entry Level or Base Level tools, forgetting their wording.
That, tools evolved to this point so these people and their
tool making first evolved elsewhere.

Sundaland?

That would make sense. It certainly is in keeping with the
models I've put forward: Coastal Dispersal (Aquatic Ape)
with populations periodically migrating into & adapting to
inland locations...

But something I've pointed out for a lot of years now:

Out of Africa purity is only enforced in the west, primarily
in the English speaking world, primarily in the U.S. China
has never bought into it, if any of the world has, and the
French here certainly imply something else...

Personally I don't find "Out of Asia" any more compelling
that Out of Africa. I think linear models are wrong. Period.
But it is refreshing to at least see something other than
OoA purity...




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/671306255488499712


DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves

unread,
Dec 26, 2021, 8:53:28 AM12/26/21
to
doze not tools doze rock.

I Envy JTEM

unread,
Dec 26, 2021, 4:03:21 PM12/26/21
to
DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

> doze not tools doze rock.

As you are so atrociously stupid I can't pretend to be surprised that you
took the two cites, merged the information between them, balanced them
against the things I pointed out and then concluded "doze not tools doze
rock."

Once again, you're oblivious to the data in front of you, yet want people to
believe you have "Insights" regarding events that transpired even millions
of years ago...




-- --

https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html

I Envy JTEM

unread,
Jan 7, 2022, 2:26:26 AM1/7/22
to
I Envy JTEM wrote:

> http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/2-1-million-year-old-stone-tools-china-06192.html
>
> They don't say it here but they actually spelled it out in
> a documentary I saw previously on Youtube, one that
> took on the Chinese & French perspective...
>
> https://youtu.be/hP75JnDwZ-o
>
> Americans aren't allowed to say this stuff.
>
> Anyhow, they speculated that the early human that left
> these tools were what gave rise to "Peking Man."
>
> They're also FURTHER AWAY from Africa than was the
> Homo georgicus BUT OLDER. So moving *away* from
> Africa they're getting older...
>
> But the real clincher here, and something they don't say
> in this cite but they did in the documentary, is that these
> are Entry Level or Base Level tools, forgetting their wording.
> That, tools evolved to this point so these people and their
> tool making first evolved elsewhere.

Are NOT!

Sorry. They are saying that these are NOT base tools. That, they
represent some lengthy development, prolonged adaptation.

These are NOT Tools 1.0 here...

THAT is what is truly fascinating.

And makes one wonder if...

> Sundaland?

If what they are finding in China is NOT Tools 1.0 then the
tool making, the technology began elsewhere. And that does
open the door to Sundaland.

Look. Humans aren't "Out of Sundaland" and we're not (Out of
Sundaland) because there were are least two catastrophic events
that devastated the area. The first was one or more meteorites
hitting the earth about 800,000 years ago and the second, of course,
was Toba.

Sundaland was Ground Zero for Toba...

This is why Africa won.

Europe (Eurasia) was the northern hemisphere, which takes the
brunt of any climate upheaval (COOLING, idiots. The climate
emergencies are all COOLING not any 1-degree-C-almost-in-like
-a-century-and-a-half but sudden and prolonged COOLING).

So Europe/Eurasia takes the brunt.

The equator recovers the quickest and Sundaland was very well
placed for such a recovery, except it was Ground Zero. Africa
wasn't.

And that's it.

Some populations had pushed south, probably becoming sexually
selected, with a quantity over quality breeding strategy, and then
after climate upheavals they were able to rapidly bounce back and
fill any voids left by the sudden die-offs.

"The penis is mightier than the sword."




-- --

https://rumble.com/vqwxtc-the-worst-of-watch-this-volume-ii.html
0 new messages