Paul Crowley wrote:
> N is a lot more than one. I quoted one case
> that happens to be in the news but, while
> such cases are rare, there are enough of
> them to prove the argument that "large
> brains" are not essential for perfectly
> normal human lives.
I've mentioned it before, and no doubt you missed it, but often you
(speaking rhetorically) can pass yourself off as more intelligent
than you really are by merely being consistent.
Stay with me here. It'll be worth it.
Anyway, check this out:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
It's a mainstream "Science" piece about a "Doomsday Glacier" thought
to be on the verge of collapse & sliding into the ocean. It's bullshit and
this much alone is enough to prove it to you:
: Corrections and clarifications: This story has been updated to reflect that
: if the Thwaites Glacier cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by
: at least a foot could take decades or centuries to occur.
Now you know from your primary school education that ice raises water
levels instantaneously. Fill a glass about halfway with water, mark the water
level on the side of the glass, drop in some ice and witness the rise!
Oo! Let's move on...
Next, mark the new water level then wait until the ice melts. It shouldn't
rise at all. Well, there can be something called "Thermal Expansion" but
if you check just when the last of the ice melts I can't image THAT, or
evaporation, coming into play here.
The point of course is that the mainstream media doesn't report science,
and even supposedly intelligent people never ever question the propaganda.
The story about the "Doomsday Glacier?" Yes it's propaganda. It's GWOBULL
WARBLING propaganda. It's the medias profession, Job-1, to make you shit
yourself in fear over the thought that the planet is burning up during an ice
age, even if it's comparatively cold right now.
Propaganda.
"Smaller brains are A-Okay!" looks like propaganda.
We need plenty of DHA, seafood, it grow larger brains and if there's one thing
that there isn't, it's an abundance of seafood. In fact there are those who
actually study this stuff that claim that the earth maybe has 40 years or so
before commercial fishing isn't even a thing.
It'll be gone. Over-fishing will have ended it... Do the Google on "The American
Passenger Pigeon" for a comparison.
But, regardless, "Science" reporting in the mainstream media is gone. We're
never getting it back. And people doing this kind of work won't see any grant
money anyway, so nobody legitimate is never going to be writing any papers.
I know, I know, "But that's only true when I want it to be! It's not true all the
time. I'm not consistent."
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/683261073766400000