Homo sapiens reached the higher latitudes of Europe by 45,000 years ago

[Primum Sapienti]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06923-7
Published: 31 January 2024
Homo sapiens reached the higher latitudes of
Europe by 45,000 years ago

Abstract
The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in
Europe is associated with the regional
disappearance of Neanderthals and the spread
of Homo sapiens. Late Neanderthals persisted
in western Europe several millennia after the
occurrence of H. sapiens in eastern Europe.
Local hybridization between the two groups
occurred, but not on all occasions.
Archaeological evidence also indicates the
presence of several technocomplexes during
this transition, complicating our understanding
and the association of behavioural adaptations
with specific hominin groups. One such
technocomplex for which the makers are unknown
is the Lincombian–Ranisian–Jerzmanowician (LRJ),
which has been described in northwestern and
central Europe5,6,7,8. Here we present the
morphological and proteomic taxonomic
identification, mitochondrial DNA analysis and
direct radiocarbon dating of human remains
directly associated with an LRJ assemblage at
the site Ilsenhöhle in Ranis (Germany). These
human remains are among the earliest directly
dated Upper Palaeolithic H. sapiens remains
in Eurasia. We show that early H. sapiens
associated with the LRJ were present in
central and northwestern Europe long before
the extinction of late Neanderthals in
southwestern Europe. Our results strengthen
the notion of a patchwork of distinct human
populations and technocomplexes present in
Europe during this transitional period.


"In summary, our work shows that the LRJ at
Ranis was made by hominins with H. sapiens
mtDNA. This indicates that pioneer groups of
H. sapiens expanded rapidly into the higher
mid-latitudes, possibly as far as the modern
day British Isles (Fig. 1b), before much
later expansions into southwestern Europe,
where directly dated Neanderthal remains are
documented until about 42,000 cal BP (Fig. 2).
Although non-directly dated and
non-genetically identified, a human deciduous
tooth from Grotte Mandrin27 also suggests an
H. sapiens incursion into southeastern France
as early as about 54,000 cal BP. If
confirmed... "

[JTEM is so reasonable]

This is a very, Very, VERY old subject of argument.

Seems impossible that any so called "Moderns" after 50k years
ago were already hybrids. They met in the middle east.

"Dah."

So any mixing happened there. They were already hybrids when
they entered Europe.

As for Europe, Wolpoff showed physical evidence for hybridization
well beyond that.

The point is that you don't look down at South Africa at 45k years
ago and see a lot of Cor Magnon..or any. They ARE the hybrid!

https://youtu.be/FlR22hcjp_w?feature=shared&t=121

There. The physical evidence never supported your nonsense.




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/741817533268656128

[Primum Sapienti]

erectus in South Africa around 2mya

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans

The multiregional hypothesis is not currently the
most accepted theory of modern human origin among
scientists. "The African replacement model has
gained the widest acceptance owing mainly to
genetic data (particularly mitochondrial DNA)
from existing populations. This model is consistent
with the realization that modern humans cannot be
classified into subspecies or races, and it
recognizes that all populations of present-day
humans share the same potential."[3] The African
replacement model is also known as the "Out of
Africa" theory. See also, "The 'out of Africa'
model is currently the most widely accepted model.
It proposes that Homo sapiens evolved in Africa
before migrating across the world."[4] And: "The
primary competing scientific hypothesis is
currently recent African origin of modern humans,
which proposes that modern humans arose as a new
species in Africa around 100-200,000 years ago,
moving out of Africa around 50-60,000 years ago
to replace existing human species such as Homo
erectus and the Neanderthals without
interbreeding.[5][6][7][8] This differs from the
multiregional hypothesis in that the multiregional
model predicts interbreeding with preexisting
local human populations in any such migration."

Maybe your space aliens helped them ;)

[JTEM is so reasonable]

Primum Sapienti wrote:

> The multiregional hypothesis is not currently the
> most accepted theory of modern human origin among
> scientists.

Interbreeding was widely & quite loudly denounced, even though
the evidence was quite clear generations ago, and even after
Trinkaus put the matter to rest with his work. It was still
popularly believed AND DEFENDED that there was no interbreeding.

The fact is that we do have different populations. Period.

> "The African replacement model has
> gained the widest acceptance owing mainly to
> genetic data (particularly mitochondrial DNA)

I've explained this to you and others so many times that I can
guarantee that you will read almost nothing and understand
even less:

Modern Europeans haven't been in places like South America
and Africa for very long, in terms of human origins, yet they
have already completely swamped the DNA of many a local
dog breed, including the Pharaoh Hound of Egypt...

Yet, when the exact same pattern pattern emerges in human
DNA, you insist that it proves the classic "Replacement"
model.

Wow.

Talk about "Dogmatic"... Sheesh!




-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/742798356654473216