On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:52:55 -0700 (PDT),
shr...@cyberspace.org
<
shr...@cyberspace.org> wrote:
>
> I was chatting with a power company guy the other day about what
> defoliants they use in powerline easements. He told me it was
> mostly glyphosate, (round up) which inspired me to do a little
> reading.
>
Mr. Snippo was here.
> My interpretation of the available data, (which I humbly request
> professionals in the field verify for themselves.) leads me to
> believe that short term toxicity tests are/were unlikely to
> expose the relationship between CCD and GL.
>
> A substance does not have to kill a single bee to destroy a
> hive. All it has to do is disrupt the ability of the queen to
> effectively procreate, which is something that an endocrine
> disrupter can certainly do. The relative exposure rate for bees
> by body-weight must be extremely high.
Often when a queen becomes old and lays less whe is
superceeded by the hive. But, then maybe, something else is
happening.
>
> In a nutshell, it might be an interesting project for some
> professionals, to (among themselves and in complete secrecy)
> find a few control bee yards that have no GL nearby, and start
> keeping comparison data in relation to other yards. Probably
> enlisting the help of a number of reputable third parties as
> observers to verify the data.
Mr. Snippo again.
> Seriously, how did things ever get this fucked up?
Better living through chemistry!
--
In Pierre Trudeau, Canada has finally produced a Prime Minister worthy of
assassination. - John Diefenbaker