Fwd: [VOTE] Release Axiom 1.2.8

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Senaka Fernando

unread,
Jan 5, 2009, 11:40:38 AM1/5/09
to sci-fl...@googlegroups.com
Folks, can we go for something similar? Benson also stated about a Confluence page for XmlSchema, and the XmlSchema pom.xml that might sound helpful.

Rgds,
Senaka

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benson Margulies <bimar...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Axiom 1.2.8
To: commo...@ws.apache.org


I'm not so sure that you need a new branch. The release plugin works
roughly like this:

Assume that you have a branch and the checked-in branch has a pom with
a version like x.y-SNAPSHOT:

1) asks you for the release version.
2) bashes the POM(s) to that version
3) builds artifacts.
4) checks in.
5) Tags that revision in your directory of tags.
6) puts the version back to snapshot.
7) checks in.

Then, if you want a branch that hangs off the release, I guess another
svn cp from the tag would be the recipe.


On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Andreas Veithen
<andreas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also fixed the XOP/MTOM issue in r731318 in trunk. I didn't merge it
> yet to the 1.2.8 branch, but if we follow Benson's suggestion (which I
> support), we will probably have to recreate the branch anyway.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 15:23, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Andreas - also I forgot to remove the SNAPSHOT dependencies!
>>
>> Will do round two this morning.
>>
>> --Glen
>>
>> Andreas Veithen wrote:
>>> -1: Except for axiom-api, all modules still have version number 1.2.8-SNAPSHOT.
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 03:44, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi folks:
>>>>
>>>> I've taken the current Axiom trunk, branched it off (although it
>>>> looks like we're using tags/ for branches for axiom, which seems a
>>>> little odd...) updated the version number, and uploaded the artifacts here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~gdaniels/axiom/dist/1.2.8/
>>>>
>>>> Please kick the tires, and respond with a +1 (please indicate
>>>> binding/non-binding) if you are good with these artifacts.
>>>>
>>>> --Glen
>>>>
>>
>

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages