To my advice the HFK-fuel bladders suffer from a design flaw. Although I was filling these strictly according to the manual (emptying them totally before refilling with only 10 l from a jerrycan holding just this volume. The first fuel leak/depletion occured overnight, detectable by vertically descending oil stripes at the fuselage).
The right sided wing tank had been exchanged free of charge at the factory, but SHK was not willing to unveil to me the site or mechanism of the leak. The following season a second fuel leak occured inflight at the left WT (detectable by oblique passing oil stripes at left side of fuselage) and soon again also to the already replaced right WT, this time after only 8 fillings. This amounts to 3 leaky HFK fuel tanks in 45 flights or an average of 15 fillings per fuel bladder...!
I then decided to replace both WT by myself during wintertime and found that both fuel bladders were in fact well welded around and itself seal; but both surrounding imitation-leather-envelopes showed rolled up borders without any found trace of the formerly used contact-glue. The fuel leak at one bladder stemmed clearly from loose Banjo bolts/screws at the in-/outlet, as well as at the vent. On the other fuel bag it concerned only the in-/outlet Banjo screw, detectable by the split and separated blue color dots. There was no thread-sealing glue (i.e. Loktite) detectable at the Banjo fittings and I also missed some safety wire withholding the Banjo screws from unscrewing.
These HFK-fuel bladders have not been airworthy. Of course the different leaks occured during alpine summer camps in SE-France and Austria. How could the present design (with whatever washers it may be fitted) be seal with ground temperatures up to 35 °C and freezing temperatures while flying the wave up to FL 195. In addition the sometimes bumpy alpine gliding may well have aided to unscrew the Banjo-in-/outlets.
Understanding finally the way it leaks and realizing meanwhile that SHK still hesitated to look for a better supplier, I decided to install two well proven australian fuel bags from www.turtlepac.com. They arrived for AUD 1'760.-both (about € 1'200 .--, shipment by FedEx included). Compare this amount to the 2 x € 1'450.-- that SHK billed for the HFK-bladders, if installed prior to delivery! The turtlepac bladders have a volume of indicated 15 l, a much stronger protecting envelope that is solidly sewed (not only glued), clever fuel in-/outlets both situated on the dorsal side, with Loktite sealed threads for the Banjo screws, as well as a much wider sealing area between bladder and compressing alu plates.
In meanwhile 56 days and nights (including 16 alpine flights) with the same permanently filled and blocked turtlepac wing tank, there was no leak at all and no more fuel smell (I generally use lead free Mogas 95) after opening the canopy in the morning. After having to tie down for the very first time the Arcus M in a left wing down position (the IMI wing-stands had already been transported to arrival destination...), I noticed next day during the preflight check some vertically downpassing oil stripes on the right side of the fuselage. It turned out that this must have been a burden of the past, because there was no fuel smell within the right wing (lid at its underside removed). What are the communitiy's experiences in this behalf?
According to Denny the quality of the HFK bladder material is good, but the hardware used to connect the lines isn't. He informed me that Aerotech can make bladders like this as a replacement for the HFK bladders. I am impressed by what I have seen in their shop today! They make high quality bladders for all kind of purposes, from warbirds to racecars. They can be a good alternative for the original HFK tank, and Penney and Denny are very helpfull. We certainly consider Aerotech when we have to replace our HFK in 5 years from now.
What year is your Arcus?
Mark
Johan