Minutes and poll for next meeting

[Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe]

Hello all,

I've posted the minutes from Thursday's meeting:

https://codeberg.org/scheme/r7rs/wiki/Minutes+2026-04-30.-

As usual, please take a look and make sure I've accurately represented
your contributions.

Here's a poll for the next meeting time:

https://terminplaner6.dfn.de/en/p/8e5a6808df2ef31983dc39a89776f97c-1733738

Please fill in your available slots. All times are UTC!

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <w...@sigwinch.xyz>

[John Cowan]

I didn't actually vote for #260: I said that if we had to have one or
the other I would prefer it to #258, and gave a use case for it.
Count me as abstaining.

As for `conjugate`, I proposed the issue and didn't retract it so I
took it for granted that I implicitly voted for it.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scheme-reports-wg2/afYvmxkog1qwfp1D%40xanthus.sigwinch.xyz.

[Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe]

On 2026-05-02 14:21 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> I didn't actually vote for #260: I said that if we had to have one or
> the other I would prefer it to #258, and gave a use case for it.
> Count me as abstaining.
>
> As for `conjugate`, I proposed the issue and didn't retract it so I
> took it for granted that I implicitly voted for it.

ACK. I'll correct the minutes.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <w...@sigwinch.xyz>