scheme-reports-wg1

Thank you John, for all your hard work over the years, both in WG1 and WG2. It was a pleasure to

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:07 PM Alex Shinn <alex...@gmail.com> wrote: To recap: Thanks. It

Reviewed. On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 6:18 AM John Cowan <co...@ccil.org> wrote: Someone should

I just put a pull request through, covering #39 & #40. The latter was the only other semantics-

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:56 AM Chris Hanson <c...@chris-hanson.org> wrote: 1. Taylor Campbell

Hello, Ondřej Majerech and I discovered together in #scheme that sections 2.1 and 7.1.1 of the R7RS

> On Nov 22, 2022, at 1:09 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler <sch...@speechcode.com> wrote: > >

Listed as errata 31 and 32 in <https://github.com/johnwcowan/r7rs-work/blob/master/R7RSSmallErrata

Good idea. Brad On 6/26/22 10:01 AM, John Cowan wrote: > > I think this should become an

1. Matching does _not_ require the identifier be bound to work, so your observation adds nothing new

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 3:50 PM Daphne Preston-Kendal <d...@nonceword.org> wrote: Section 6.2.5

The parameterize form in R7RS is, at best, underspecified if read favorably. The R7RS reads: "

Am Di., 3. Aug. 2021 um 10:46 Uhr schrieb Alex Shinn <alex...@gmail.com>: I'm trying to

There are good reasons to maintain due process. If nothing else, it provides an editing cycle, which

Hello John, What you describe is a plausible scenario where the specified semantics work. But a

As originally written, `guard` invokes `raise-continuable` when none of the guard clauses is

Andy WIngo pointed out on #guile that the definition of `symbol=?` has the same problem as the

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:16 PM Alex Shinn <alex...@gmail.com> wrote: Allowing Numeric

Voting is now closed on the Tangerine Edition ballot and the accompanying Orange Edition straw poll.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ivan Raikov <ivan.g...@gmail.com> wrote: Isn't the

I have sent a request to the SRFI Editor to remove all references to u1vectors (bitvectors) from SRFI

Ok, now I believe what you're proposing is scoping labels to the file / textual-port they are

Nobody has voted in the last eight days. To make reaching the forms easier, I have created two short

Nobody speaks for WG1 nowadays, but your message is duly forwarded. As for giving R5RS semantics to

I received this report with a request to forward it to WG1. You who receive this message are WG1 for

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Aaron W. Hsu <arc...@sacrideo.us> wrote: Oi Oi Oi! LOL, this

I have uploaded the repo for the R7RS-small report to <https://bitbucket.org/cowan/r7rs>.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:53 PM, William D Clinger <wi...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: That, however, is

Formal semantics folks should look at this. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mark H

CC-ing <scheme-reports-wg1>. On Oct 31, 2016 8:12 AM, "Alex Shinn" <alexshinn@