Hi Steve,
if I'm not too pushy, I have another question that I submitted in a simplified way yesterday on this Group.
Shortly I found that the mass activity evaluated as the ratio between activity and mass (Bq/g) with ORIGEN-ARP at a fixed burn-up level of Ce-152, Ce-155, Ce-146 and Ce-157 is not consistent with the values evaluated with the theoretical relationship.
were Na is the Avogadro number, M is the atomic mass and T1/2 is the decay time. In particular, despite for Ce-152 SCALE uses a decay time (1.24 s) equal to that suggested in on line reference [1] that i have used for the theoretical evaluation, the results are different:
Nuclide SCALE Theoric1 Theoric2 Ratio Ratio
(-) (-) (T1/2: Wikipedia) (T/2: SCALE) (Theoric1/SCALE) (Theoric2/SCALE)
Ce-152 3.58E+20 1.96E+21 1.96E+21 5.48 5.48
Ce-155 5.10E+21 1.35E+22 5.67E+21 2.64 1.11
Ce-156 4.49E+21 1.78E+22 7.25E+21 3.97 1.62
Ce-157 1.24E+22 5.32E+22 1.09E+22 4.29 0.88
were Theoric1 is the result of a theoric calculation with decay time as reported in wikipedia, while Theoric2 using a decay time reported on SCALE decay file (i.e., origen.rev03.decay). As you can see the Ce-155, Ce-156, Ce-157 results mostly depends on different decay time but, despite I used the same SCALE decay time (Theoric2) the results are still different (10 - 80%).
Best Regards,
Antonio Guglielmelli