SCALE 6: Differences between CENTRM and MCNP spectra

122 views
Skip to first unread message

SCALE Software Coordinator

unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 3:20:49 PM1/7/13
to
This topic has been migrated from the SCALE 6 notebook.
Date: Tue May 24 10:30:23 2011
 

I've been trying to benchmark CENTRM to a similar MCNP calculation and am seeing a disparity between the two that I can't explain. The attached plot shows the spectra generated by the two programs. The CENTRM spectrum is much harder for some reason.

In MCNP I'm modeling a large sphere of U-238 with reflected boundaries intended to be an infinite medium) and taking a fine energy mesh tally of the neutrons. I created the MCNP data library by running RECONR and BROADR modules of NJOY to reconstruct and broaden the U-238 to 900 K. Fission is turned off and I'm using an analytic Watt fission spectrum according to S(E) = exp(-E/0.966)*sinh(sqrt(2.842*E) (MCNP manual page H-3) for the source.

In CENTRM I am using the below input. My source given in card 31** is obtained by integrating the Watt Fission spectrum over the 238 energy groups used in SCALE.

Any help would be appreciated. I'm basing this input off of the example problem for CENTRM given in the SCALE manual at F18.6.2 and I may have missed something when modifying it for my problem.

=shell

del C:\scale6\tmpdir\ft88f001

copy C:\scale6\data\xn238v7 ft88f001

end

=ajax

0$$ 11 0

1$$ 1 T

2$$ 88 1 T

3$$ 92238

4$$ 92238 T

end

=bonami

0$$ 11 0 18 1

1$$ 0 1 1 1 1 0

2** e t

3$$ 1

4$$ 92238

5** 1.000

6$$ 10000

8** 9.00000E+02

10$$ 92238

11$$ 0 t

end

=worker

0$$ 1 0 4 18 19 0

1$$ 1 0 -2 -1 -1 1 1 1

1t

2$$ 92238

6** 9.00000E+02

2t

end

=crawdad

0$$ 81 17 18 77

1$$ 1 66666 1 0 0 1 e

1t

2$$ 92238 7 -1 1 0 -1 0

3** 1.00000E-04 2.000E+07

2t

4** 9.00000E+02

3t

end

=centrm

CENTRM: U-238 Inf medium at 900 K

0$$ 7 0 4 81 0 25

15 16 17 18 19 8

9

1$$ 0 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 64 0 20 100

2 2 3 3 64 1

2$$ -2 3 0 1 0 2

0 1 100 64 0 0

3** 1.00000E-04 1.00000E-04 1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00

2.00000E+04 1.00000E-03 1.00000E-01 0.00000E+00

t

13$$ 1

14$$ 92238

15** 1.0000

t

30$$ 1

31**

9.61E+00

3.18E+01

6.59E+01

8.57E+01

2.44E+02

3.78E+03

1.29E+04

4.60E+04

1.39E+05

8.15E+04

3.80E+05

2.48E+05

7.00E+04

3.27E+05

2.70E+05

8.34E+04

3.75E+04

3.36E+04

5.86E+04

4.44E+04

9.02E+04

8.26E+04

8.36E+04

1.87E+04

2.34E+04

1.30E+04

3.85E+04

6.57E+04

6.64E+04

8.38E+03

6.48E+04

2.47E+04

2.09E+04

4.54E+04

2.61E+04

2.62E+04

1.72E+04

1.70E+04

5.77E+04

4.66E+04

4.99E+04

3.19E+04

1.26E+04

1.51E+04

7.30E+03

1.39E+03

3.16E+03

8.80E+02

5.44E+03

3.09E+03

7.40E+02

1.79E+03

4.79E+03

1.38E+03

1.93E+03

8.18E+02

6.21E+02

2.31E+02

2.85E+02

2.48E+02

1.66E+01

7.22E+01

3.73E+01

2.41E+01

7.18E+00

3.01E+01

1.72E+01

3.29E+00

2.14E+01

1.09E+01

1.28E+01

5.70E-01

4.99E+00

8.51E+00

5.79E-01

1.23E+00

7.58E-01

6.09E-02

3.58E-01

1.51E-01

1.34E+00

5.55E-02

7.29E-02

1.25E-01

1.38E-01

1.64E-01

1.25E-01

3.03E-02

5.96E-02

5.80E-02

6.34E-02

3.43E-02

5.35E-02

2.61E-02

7.08E-02

1.71E-02

1.69E-02

1.67E-02

1.06E-02

1.51E-02

2.06E-02

1.35E-02

1.77E-02

1.52E-02

1.50E-02

5.29E-03

1.15E-02

1.03E-02

1.52E-02

8.98E-03

8.38E-03

4.88E-03

1.44E-02

4.73E-03

1.17E-02

2.26E-02

2.16E-02

2.05E-02

1.18E-02

7.63E-03

7.44E-03

3.65E-03

1.07E-02

6.85E-03

5.98E-03

4.53E-03

4.11E-03

5.23E-03

5.94E-03

2.31E-03

8.29E-03

4.69E-03

4.94E-03

4.42E-03

6.73E-04

1.11E-03

1.08E-03

1.06E-03

1.04E-03

2.41E-03

1.54E-03

9.31E-04

2.64E-03

8.95E-04

7.37E-04

1.08E-03

2.97E-04

1.47E-04

8.74E-05

2.88E-04

2.83E-04

2.78E-04

2.73E-04

2.68E-04

2.36E-04

2.06E-04

2.28E-04

2.23E-04

2.90E-04

1.42E-04

1.86E-04

2.04E-04

1.99E-04

1.94E-04

1.89E-04

1.02E-04

1.01E-04

9.89E-05

9.70E-05

9.52E-05

4.69E-05

4.64E-05

4.59E-05

4.54E-05

1.81E-05

1.80E-05

1.79E-05

1.78E-05

1.77E-05

1.76E-05

1.75E-05

1.75E-05

1.74E-05

1.73E-05

1.72E-05

1.72E-05

1.71E-05

1.70E-05

1.69E-05

4.19E-05

4.13E-05

4.08E-05

4.03E-05

7.88E-05

7.66E-05

7.42E-05

7.18E-05

6.92E-05

3.36E-05

3.30E-05

6.39E-05

6.11E-05

5.81E-05

5.49E-05

2.62E-05

2.54E-05

2.45E-05

2.36E-05

2.26E-05

2.16E-05

2.05E-05

1.94E-05

1.82E-05

1.70E-05

1.56E-05

1.41E-05

5.20E-06

4.91E-06

4.62E-06

4.30E-06

3.95E-06

3.57E-06

3.15E-06

1.32E-06

3.40E-06

3.94E-07

3.33E-07

1.13E-07

9.96E-08

4.42E-08

4.00E-08

3.52E-08

1.86E-08

1.12E-08

1.25E-08

1.05E-08

1.14E-08

1.09E-09

t

36$$ 1

39$$ 1

41** 900

t

end

Brian Triplett

 

 

SCALE Software Coordinator

unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 12:41:34 PM1/7/13
to scale-us...@googlegroups.com
Found the disparity. I'd modified MCNP output to give units of Flux/eV and CENTRM was giving values of flux. Once I divided the CENTRM flux values by their coresponding energy they agree very well.

Brian Triplett

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages