Hi Amit,
Sorry I was busy yesterday when I approve your post, then forgot to go
back and answer it later. It looks like we may have received our first
"anyone asks for it."
At the time we wrote conductor originally, I think we were passing
configuration explicitly as an overloaded form of the conduct methods.
Now we could likely add an implicit without breaking client code,
other than it would pick up the patience in scope where before it did
not. It looks like, though, that your intuition was that it would do
just that. Do you think it would be better if the signature was:
def whenFinished(fun: => Unit)(implicit config: PatienceConfig): Unit = { ... }
Bill
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "scalatest-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
scalate...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
scalatest-use...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
>
http://groups.google.com/group/scalatest-users?hl=en
> ScalaTest itself, and documentation, is available here:
>
http://www.artima.com/scalatest
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scalatest-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
scalatest-use...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Bill Venners
Artima, Inc.
http://www.artima.com