Plan of action

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Kevin Wright

unread,
Aug 8, 2010, 3:08:35 PM8/8/10
to scala...@googlegroups.com
After a brief chat with Josh last week, here's what we came up with:

We have a single nexus installation, capable of running multiple repositories - so any process can be based around that
There's currently a single installation of Hudson, this will be used to co-ordinate everything and will take care of the dependency tree between projects
We'll hopefully be adding further Hudson nodes in the future, likely via EC2
so... using local Maven/ivy repositories is undesirable, it forces everything to run on a single machine and makes it hard to scale
There will be one attempted build per day

There are two ways we can proceed here:

a) use "stable" scala version IDs, such as 2.8.fresh, and snapshots

This would then lead to projects deployed as SNAPSHOTs, with the sbt cross-build naming convention
i.e. scalaj-collection 1.0 would be released under the id scalaj-collection_2.8.fresh:1.0-SNAPSHOT

projects targeting scala fresh would  then be kept up to date automatically

b) use timestamped scala version IDs, and make full releases

i.e. scalaj-collection 1.0 would be released under the id scalaj-collection_2010-08-08:1.0

Snapshots wouldn't be needed, but projects targetting fresh builds would need to be updated every time a newer build came out.

I'm *very* interested in getting input on how people plan to use the fresh builds to guide this decision :)



Whatever happens, it also looks as though staged nexus repositories won't help us out much.
So my current thinking is:
  • create a dedicated repo for in-progress fresh builds
  • empty this repo before each daily build
  • projects in the fresh initiative get deployed into this repo
  • if *all* projects build ant test, they get promoted en-masse to the appropriate public facing repo
opinions/viewpoints welcome!


--
Kevin Wright

mail/google talk: kev.lee...@gmail.com
wave: kev.lee...@googlewave.com
skype: kev.lee.wright
twitter: @thecoda

Derek Chen-Becker

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 5:01:05 PM8/10/10
to scala...@googlegroups.com
Sounds reasonable to me. I know Josh and I have some work items for the infrastructure (LDAP), and I can donate my home server as a build node via VPN if that helps.

Derek

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Scala Fresh" group.
To post to this group, send email to scala...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scala-fresh...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scala-fresh?hl=en.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages