Dear Hemanth Kumar etal,
I have quickly reviewed the DPR forwarded by you.
This undated DPR,prepared by Tandon consultants is very voluminous with lot of background secondary data on lakes in Bangalore.The report misses ''wood for the tree'' and is already appears outdated and is of little practical use.
It does not pointedly address the 3-4 key issues raised in Justice Patil report which should now be taken as the guiding principles in lake rejuvenation work.
Though number of aerial and google images are shown, it does not show the latest authenticated survey map by the revenue dept which is important to decide the boundaries,extent of encroachments etc.Without this how are you going to fence,decide buffer zone, pathways etc?
Detailed plans for the core and non core components of rejuvenation,identifying responsibilty for each[BDA,BWSSB OR OTHER AGENCIES] their phasing would help implementation work.The break up of the 8.25 Crore investment is not available.
The projected commercial revenue of Rs 21 lakhs per year is not feasible in view of latest High Court rulings.
This bulky report would have been more useful if a summary table/report on various physical,finacial estimates along with time phasing and responsibility is provided or added.
Thanks for sharing
Professor K S Bhat
Trustee-Sarakki Lake Area Improvement Trust