<
shivashan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Venkat.
>
> We have sent out an email about the registration.
>
> We did not elaborate on what needs to be done by the alumni because we
> wanted the alumni to come up with these ideas. Like you have done. I know
> you aren't in the bay area... but why don't you send out your ideas to the
> group. It would work wonders for the folks there to see an alumnus say this
> as opposed to us saying what they need to do.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Venkatakrishnan Ramaswamy
> <
cool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Shiva,
>>
>> I hope this finds you well, crazy times notwithstanding.
>>
>> I just had a couple of comments about the Palo Alto meeting.
>>
>> My understanding was the people who wished to attend the Palo Alto
>> meeting need to Call Tara Wind at
352-392-6795 to register. Would this
>> be made clear in the google-group? You guys should consider sending
>> out another email letting people know, because if they don't register,
>> they probably cannot show up at the meeting.
>>
>> Secondly, I think from the email it is unclear, what exactly you want
>> the alumni to do. Saying "show your support" is usually code for "give
>> us money", which turns most people of for semi-understandable reasons.
>> In essence, we need a very clear strategy. Most alumni will not have
>> the time to sit all weekend strategizing on the google group and this
>> requirement, I feel, will deter participation. What is necessary is a
>> list of pointed questions that when asked to the Dean will make it
>> amply clear to the audience that her plan lacks substance and will
>> make clear to her that she does not have the audience's support. You
>> guys have already been soaking in the kinds of arguments she has been
>> making and so it must be very clear what the specific weaknesses are
>> in those arguments and what questions will elegantly expose those
>> weaknesses. These have to be given to the alumni, I think, in an
>> easily digestable form, which would mean a concise half to one page
>> document exactly describing the key weaknesses in the plan and a list
>> of questions that remain unanswered and are therefore ones that you
>> would suggest be asked to the Dean at the meeting.
>>
>> For example, here is one: The FL legislature has made clear that this
>> is a one-time cut that they expect will be met by the Universities
>> tapping into their reserves. In spite of this explicit clarification
>> by the legislature, the UF administration is treating this as a
>> recurring cut and is not utilizing reserves to tide us over. Another
>> is the argument that without a strong research component we will still
>> be able to attract the best students with a teaching-only department
>> and that this is what people in industry would prefer. The questioner
>> could ask how many present in the room agree with this notion. I doubt
>> too many would raise their hands. That would, for example, be a clear
>> show of dissent to the Dean's plan. After this, the Dean would be
>> forced to defend herself. You can pick out several such things from
>> the material and letters already posted.
>>
>> Finally, you guys are doing an awesome awesome job with the whole
>> thing and I cannot stress how inspired many alumni including me are by
>> what we are seeing. We would like to help too. Let me know if there
>> are more ways I can contibute.
>>
>> Best,
>> Venkat