Nikki, Manish
Income
- last year raised $24,000; netted $20,000
- $6000 from sponsors
- $18,000 from 336 donors to sponsor 110 participants on 22 teams; almost all donations were small; 200 were new
- $1300 registration fees ($12 per person; covered half of cost of space)
Cost was ~17% of gross income
- POWER’s fundraising goal: $150 for individuals, $750 for teams (lower for member-teams)
- Causa Justa::Just Cause’s fundraising goals for individuals: $300 per person
Expenses
- $2400 one-time fee for multi-year use + 5-9% of donations: Kinterasphere bowlathon software - pricey, but no other software had as many needed features for the price
- $3,000 space rental: POWER paid per participant, for shoes, pizza etc. Charged teams a reg fee to help cover overhead
- $200 logo/banner design
- $100 decorations
- $350 very small prize for every person
- total cost $4080 + initial cost of web site
- spent a lot of time soliciting services to donate prizes (for best and worst scores, best costume, etc.)
Why do a thon?
- cost-effective (if we have the right tools & enough volunteers)
- much easier to do than a gala
- POWER never had a base of supporters who had tons of giving capacity, so POWER worked with the base they have and raised as much $ as their most successful gala
Things to keep in mind with thons
- the donors that come in tend to be not directly connected to the org.
- most people give because a friend/family member asked them; it’s a lot of work to connect with those people and retain them as donors after the campaign (so it’s not a good strategy if we want to get donors who are committed to giving over the long-term)
- next year, look at who gave again from the previous year, who gave more, and who gave to multiple people, and focus donor cultivation on that; put a check box on each participant’s reg form: if you’re willing to cultivate your donors after the bowlathon, check this box
- change it up once in a while to bring in major donors (a gala serves that purpose: allows the org. to showcase its work and to do a really great program and recognize major donors who want this type of event. At a gala, everyone who comes is a strong potential repeat donor.)
- every staff member had to lead a team and recruit a few other teams
- Recruit more teams and members than actual goal cuz teams/people drop off
- recruitment takes 1 month to ID prospects, call them to ask them to form a team, follow up, follow up again, get people registered
- recruit teams early and encourage them to meet to start their fundraising asap
- recruit volunteers to help event organizers coordinate the event itself
- do lots of follow-up
- include a short program at the event
- if it’s fun and people care, people generally are down to do it
Other types of thons
- outdoor/subject to weather: basketball, walk
- indoor: dance-a-thon (Aspen liked this for LM, because it’s easier for different teams to interact w/ each other)
- At the Crossroads- recruits tons of people to do personal campaigns where they each set a personal goal for themselves- Jane Kim decided to cook dinner for friends 1x/month- got ppl to donate so she’d accomplish her goal – another person: if I reach my fundraising goal I’ll ask Sarah Silverman out publicly (was really motivating for ppl)- they raised ton of $ from ton of ppl
- multi-thon? NO- When you have a bunch of different activities, you need lots of people to coordinate each one and a small group of people putting the big pieces together. It spreads people too thin. If ppl had to be in charge of staffing an activity, they wouldn’t be able to lead a team as well, cuz too much work
- instead of a multi-thon, have one activity with different roles (eg. bike-a-thon with some people as cheerleaders, others as pit stop attendants, etc.)
Why they chose to do a bowlathon
- FIERCE (LGBTQ youth of color org. in NY) and SAGE (LA) do successful bowlathons
- POWER’s members really liked the idea of doing something indoors that wasn’t dependent on having good weather
What worked
- picking something anyone can do (bowling doesn’t take any real skill)
- adding in really fun elements: having a live dj, announcements and playing trivia during event, participants were dressed in costume
- getting prize solicitations so people who raised most $ etc. got really good prizes)
- refreshing alternative to a gala; multiracial, multigenerational, families came; crunched allies and friends hard to lead a team
- encouraging captains to meet w/ their team asap, so they could create team name, create fundraising plan together- many teams do joint fundraising together; it’s much more successful than individual fundraising
- doing LOTS of follow-up w/ participants and mostly w/ team captains
- because teams were raising $ ahead of time, they weren’t depending on depending on people buying tix at the door or donating at the event (they didn’t do an ask at event)
- doing a really short program so people can get connected to the org.
What was hard for them
- as many skills, tips, support you give, some people just don’t follow-through with their fundraising
- people need lots of follow-up
- many of their Latin@ members had never bowled before; for their African American members, it’s been a really hard sell (they pushed hard for their members to do it)
- is more work for some teams so after a few years, some ally groups cant do it anymore
- bowling isn’t as popular as it once was
- there isn’t a lot of time for people from different teams to interact with each other
- staff were so busy leading teams that they didn’t focus on mingling with the crowd
- their anniversary is next year, so they’ll do something else instead of a bowlathon
| Manish, Yes. We'd very much appreciate Priscilla doing a training session on June 8th. Should we schedule her at 6:15 so we have some meeting time before hand? Get back to us with details when you can. I know you're trying to take some time - so if you'd rather have someone else contact her and set up the details let me know. Cheryl . --- On Sun, 5/15/11, Manish Vaidya <socialju...@hotmail.com> wrote: |
| Kara, I'm going to forward a WELCOME and thanks for signing up message from Network for Good to Teri and Anne in case it helps you. c . --- On Thu, 5/19/11, Kara Desiderio <karan...@gmail.com> wrote: |
Hey Kara,
Happy Friday the 13th!
I'm writing to follow up about switching from Paypal to Network for Good. So Network for Good changed their pricing and features:
- Basic DonateNow (basic fundraising-focused donation processing page at $20 a month charged to LM, + 3% transaction fee which includes all credit card processing, charged to LM or to donor if the donor wants) has turned into DonateNow Lite (no monthly fee, no transaction fees for LM, but 5% transaction fee charged to donor, whether the donor likes it or not)
- Custom DonateNow (customizable page that looks like LM's web site, for $30 a month charged to LM, + 3% transaction fee that donor can choose to pay or taken as a deduction from the gift), has become DonateNow ($50 a month + 3% transaction fee).
Orgs that use DonateNow raise 38% more $ online than orgs that use DonateNow Lite. I think that's mostly cuz the DonateNow page looks like the rest of the org's web site, and you can add testimonials from donors, so people are more likely to give to that kind of page.
So that's more than I thought it would cost.. There are other options than Network for Good, too. But I recommend leaving Paypal 4 sure. What do you want to do?
PS I'm copying Melyssa on this cuz she was gonna do the tech pieces to make it happen.
xo
manish
| Not to muddy any of this but NFG also offers an email service and platform for creating and delivering newsletters. c . |
--- On Tue, 5/24/11, Manish Vaidya <socialju...@hotmail.com> wrote: |
|
| Thanks for your work on this Manish. I will follow up with Priscilla. c . |
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Manish Vaidya <socialju...@hotmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
|