I realize that in the World of delimited, specific, and specialized groups, goals, and disciplines, action and reflection, in sync, may seem like an unclear way of going about working together. However, there's the alternative of "process", especially helpful in dealing with such a variety of people with differing class, race, value systems, academic preparation, and experience. When acting, everyone needs to agree on the page the group is going to tread on. And if everyone can't agree, why compete and not integrate a variety of issues to work on? One by one, of course. There's also the factor of schedules, and how inspired the people involved are in the discussion at hand, which is a process, in of itself, that can be built up; that is, with the patient
facilitation of leaders interested in looking at the experience, also, as an opportunity to aid younger talent in maturing their own leadership skills (especially if we consider the present path of our education, perhaps, it is indeed a worthwhile action, to develop a culture of popular education-vs. institutionalized-amongst CCSF students). Anyways, not everyone is aware of the content of the issues discussed last week, which is an important stepping stone to work on, as well as the motivation to do something about them. Also, communication amongst people of associated concerns, like a sustainable political culture and human dignity, I feel, is key in order to be able to evolve our minds, beyond the fractured competition of the very authority that we're trying to free ourselves from.
So...basically, that's why I wrote to you in the first place. I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to remember where
we are all coming from, and being able to articulate it to other concerned minds, yes? Shall we continue co-creating?