Thanks for doing these tests and sharing the resulting plots.
I'll note that the SAWBird LNAs have generally been designed using
*already available* SAW filters that happen to
"straddle" the bands of interest--this is particularly the case
for the +H1 LNA, where they used a filter that's designed
for another application but happens to adequately "cover" H1.
Which is why it's about 65MHz wide, rather than the
27MHz notional bandwidth of the radio astronomy band. Had they
had custom SAW filters made, the "street" price of
these devices would be considerably higher...
In practice, this seems to be fine, although we "augmented" our
filtering at the CCERA observatory with a wideband (200MHz),
low-loss filter custom built for us by PE1RKI, and placed
(horror-of-horrors) IN FRONT of our SawBird LNAs.
The main concern for us was the cell-site less than 1 km from the
observatory with fairly-strong 700MHz transmitters that
could conceivably de-sense the 1st stage. Praise be to whatever
gods one praises for such things, the 700MHz frequency
plan around here avoids situations where the 2nd harmonic can fall
into the radio astronomy band.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/1173b497-d2ef-4d29-9ff0-b0d452ae2700n%40googlegroups.com.