Best LNA for Noaa and Meteor satellite reception

168 views
Skip to first unread message

Sasha Films

unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 4:08:13 PM2/16/21
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Hi all,

I want to receive noaa and meteor satellite images, and I built a DCA antenna. I get a really strong signal for meteor, but for noaa, I get a growing signal, then, a rapid drop to nothing.  I think an LNA would help with this. I looked at a Nooelec LNA, here, but some reviews say that is breaks down and stops working when it arrives. It is pricey, so I am wondering, what LNA do you use? Is my LNA worth it?

Thanks in advance 

Job Geheniau

unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 5:50:08 PM2/16/21
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Hi 

I get very good results with a QFH helix antenna (self build) and a cheap Chinese LNA.(https://nl.aliexpress.com/item/4000945033160.html)
Thats really enough for Meteor, Noaa AND ISS.


Op dinsdag 16 februari 2021 om 22:08:13 UTC+1 schreef sasha...@gmail.com:

Emmett Kyle

unread,
Feb 16, 2021, 6:26:53 PM2/16/21
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
I've been using two Noolec Sawbirds to receive GOES16 and 17 signals. They both work very well. I've had no issues with them for 1694.1MHz. I actually was able to see a -169dbm signal with one connected to my HP8566 spectrum analyzer.

Sasha Films

unread,
Feb 17, 2021, 8:59:40 AM2/17/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Thanks! Is it better to just assemble an LNA myself out of components? Aliexpress takes four weeks to ship. 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sara-list/yphfNI7xGuA/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/713c7e03-5571-4493-92f2-0fe053991513n%40googlegroups.com.

Sasha Films

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 4:38:10 PM2/18/21
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Are the Nooelec LNAs reliable? They seem to break down a few weeks after arrival. 

Hamish Barker

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 5:52:32 PM2/18/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
I have been running nooelec sawbird h+ land for a year or so. Breakage due to mechanical trauma and rainwater flooding but not just unprovoked failure. I think they are good value for money.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/ff1f600e-6842-41ea-8040-8072f8947735n%40googlegroups.com.

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 5:59:30 PM2/18/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
On 02/18/2021 05:52 PM, Hamish Barker wrote:
I have been running nooelec sawbird h+ land for a year or so. Breakage due to mechanical trauma and rainwater flooding but not just unprovoked failure. I think they are good value for money.

I have a number of the NooElec LNAs.   We've been running them in our 21cm dual-polarization spectrometer for a couple of years without
  incident, and I was using the LaNA in our pulsar telescope for many months without incident.


Sasha Films

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 7:05:39 PM2/18/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Is a wideband LNA better for Hydrogen line observations? Or a specific one for the frequency? Is a wideband LNA acceptable?

Sasha Films

unread,
Feb 18, 2021, 7:06:55 PM2/18/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
And is this good for NOAA and Hydrogen line observations?

Hamish Barker

unread,
Feb 19, 2021, 2:47:23 AM2/19/21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
that one is listed only up to 100Mhz. Hydrogen line is 1420.405 MHz . Best to have one with a filter +/- 10-20MHz or else everyone's RFI will swamp your receiver. Hence the recommendation of the Nooelec sawbird H+. A little more expensive than that amazon one, but works great. And the barebones one has a built in switchable 50 ohm load so one could make a dicke switch setup pretty easily (although would need a pulse generator and software subtract in phase with the pulses.). I have used it to simply record a baseline spectrum with the 50 ohm load then subtract that from the antenna feed, but as temperature varies the lna and receiver gains change so the baseline gets a bit less useful.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages