Ordering GPS clock for maser work

54 views
Skip to first unread message

andrew....@googlemail.com

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 6:07:07 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to sara...@googlegroups.com

This is the external clock I have purchased – I believe it has been recommended several times on this mailing list in past and has advantage of producing correct voltage and being very flexible, and being set by GPS constantly so very accurate.

 

LBE-1420 GPDSO locked clock source from Leo Bodnar https://www.leobodnar.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=107&products_id=393

 

One question I would like to ask members of this group – conceptually, can two telescopes using these clocks be run disconnected from each other, both observing same target (say the sun) and saving data locally – perhaps using SDR#; and then later the data combined in analysis – e.g. on Excel values at same GPS time-stamp on data (from GPS clock source on each telescope) added or multiplied – to generate interferometry results which will show the typical interferometry trace as sun passes through the beam of the radio telescopes? Would that work without the telescopes being physically linked, without them sending data to the same computer during collection?

 

Andy

 

 

 

image001.png
Leo Bodnar GPS-locked clock source LBE-1420-Datasheet-v1.1 (acc 200726).pdf

Stephen Arbogast

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 6:17:25 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
I have been using a previous model of this GPSDO  for six  years, since 2020.  It is still very accurate and stable.
Stephen

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 6:17:36 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Unfortunately, that won't work.  The way the local crystal is "steered" uses a servo algorithm.  While at a gross scale, two such GPSDOs will agree with one another
  quite well, the devil is in the details.  They will have phase noise that is mutually uncorrelated, and therefore the correlation of two such baseband streams will
  generally be uncorrelated as well.  The correlation, averaged over a few 10s of seconds won't be zero, but it will have a considerably lower SNR compared to
  two receivers that are in effect sharing a single clock.   Indeed, you could have a "master clock" for a receiver pair that is relatively crappy (cheap XTAL), and it would
  still produce quite-decent correlation results, because both receivers are "zigging and zagging" in perfect synchrony with one another.

I've measured GPSDOs in the lab many years ago--they were sharing a single antenna.  They didn't usefully agree on their fine-scale phase noise.  I wrote a simulation years
  ago that demonstrates this.  The correlation SNR plummets precipitously as the mutual phase-noise increases.


 

 

 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/008801dd1894%241548c560%243fda5020%24%40googlemail.com.

Stephen Arbogast

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 6:28:23 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
IMG_2316.jpeg

Andrew Thornett

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 6:32:17 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Oh is yours the previous model? Looks quite different with lots of extra ports but I guess that means little.
Andy



From: 'Stephen Arbogast' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2026 23:17:25
To: Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [SARA] Re: Ordering GPS clock for maser work
 
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

Stephen Arbogast

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 7:10:57 PM (8 days ago) Jul 20
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Andy,
If needed  you  can buy  a distribution  amplifier  to run both SDR's  from  one GPSDO  clock source.
Stephen

Stephen Arbogast

unread,
Jul 20, 2026, 8:47:07 PM (7 days ago) Jul 20
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
For whatever it is worth  here is my  BG7TBL  GPSDO output on  an oscilloscope with  FFT...
Stephen



BG7TBl_ 2020.jpeg

Marko Cebokli

unread,
Jul 21, 2026, 1:56:25 AM (7 days ago) Jul 21
to sara...@googlegroups.com

To see, if you can do interferometry, as a course criterium, you can use the lambda/8 rule for telescope mirrors. Converted to phase/time, it means you must keep within 45 degrees of phase. This gets proportionally harder, as you go higher in frequency, since 45 degrees equates to less and less nanoseconds. Long term drift will limit the maximum integration time you can use.

A good (!) GPSDO would be suitable for interferometry on HF (like 20MHz Jupiter or Sun), and maybe for lower VHF. For the 21cm line, no way. Note that all GPSDOs are NOT created equal, far from that! 

A few years ago, I did some measurements on various OCXOs and GPSDOs. As is true with all of my projects, this is also a perpetual work in progress :-)  It includes some common antenna GPSDO tests:

https://lea.hamradio.si/~s57uuu/mischam/tenmp/index.html 

I also tested the GPSDO performance with different antenna locations (sky coverage) and tried to analyze diurnal variations, while experimenting with developing a GPSDO myself:

https://lea.hamradio.si/~s57uuu/mischam/gpsy/index.html

Did play a little with rubidiums, but will have to do more work on them, to know them better.

https://lea.hamradio.si/~s57uuu/mischam/rub/index.html

In the mean time, I have moved, and have no access to the roof at the new place, so can't locate the GPS antenna optimally, and such work is currently stalled.

Marko Cebokli



21.07.2026 00:17, je Marcus D. Leech napisal

Stephen Arbogast

unread,
Jul 21, 2026, 2:58:05 AM (7 days ago) Jul 21
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Marcus,

How  should  we  measure phase noise today  ?

Stephen


On Monday, July 20, 2026 at 4:17:36 PM UTC-6 Marcus D. Leech wrote:

fasleitung3

unread,
Jul 21, 2026, 3:59:11 AM (7 days ago) Jul 21
to sara...@googlegroups.com
At the upcoming SARA conference I will be giving a talk about Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) between our 25-m dish and the 25-m dish in Dwingloo. This talk will also cover the clocks used on both ends and the stability requirements.
In a nutshell: Hydrogen maser on one side and high quality rubdium on the other sided works, if the freqency offset of the rubidium is known and very stable. Also, rubidium on both ends work if again the offsets are known and stable.
Best regards,
Wolfgang
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages