nooelec SAWbirdH1 Evals

114 views
Skip to first unread message

Alex P

unread,
Aug 13, 2025, 12:39:38 PMAug 13
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
I ran  gain / bandwidth tests on two nooelec SAWbird LNAs .
Gains +39 dB for one, +40 dB for the other .. pass band filter ripple very similar

Alex Pettit

nooelecSAWbirdH1eval01.jpg

b alex pettit jr

unread,
Aug 13, 2025, 12:45:04 PMAug 13
to 'Alex P' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
PDF attached

On Wednesday, August 13, 2025 at 12:39:44 PM EDT, 'Alex P' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> wrote:


I ran  gain / bandwidth tests on two nooelec SAWbird LNAs .
Gains +39 dB for one, +40 dB for the other .. pass band filter ripple similar

Alex Pettit

Inline image




nooelec_SAWbirdH1_Eval01.pdf

Mike Otte

unread,
Aug 13, 2025, 10:38:34 PMAug 13
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Alex,
Tuesday, I too got out the VNA and used it.  It is always a learning experience.

My mission was to test the 4 x  snowbirds in my interferometer.  last July 28 it quit giving me results and would only give me noise of 100 -200 counts on the A/d,  usually 5-10 counts.
Were they good or bad?   Go -  No go test  not calibrated test.

So i have 4 sawbirds for the interferometer and 2 sawbirds for experimenting  and 1 sawbird barebones for reserve.

My setup was  a VNA - 2  , 1-  20dB attenuator for input and 1- 20 dB for the output.  I watched a couple of Utube videos and the one guy was very specific about the order of hooking up the cables.
I did this with the VNA live.
1 - output of sawbird to input of vna  > ch1
2- input of sawbird to output of vna > ch0 
3- hook up power to the sawbird
Do test - read numbers and see shape
4- unhook power
5- unhook input of sawbird   > ch0
6- unhook output of sawbird  > ch1

No, I did not use an isolator to block the DC and probably should have.  I knew that there was dc on the output but did not remeber.  There was a 20dB attenuator on both leads to the vna and i checked the sawbird output attenutaor and it was not changed nor destroyed.

Repeated for each of the 7 sawbirds.
Results were similar to what you saw.   All of them worked! All good.  problem is else where.

attached is a poor picture of my setup

Thanks Alex,   Good Info!

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/725193663.2750747.1755103492015%40mail.yahoo.com.


--
Mike Otte W9YS
IMG_20250812_102211_HDR.jpg

b alex pettit jr

unread,
Aug 14, 2025, 7:12:41 AMAug 14
to sara...@googlegroups.com
The second half of the investigation was to eval acq software which uses freq shifting for  'drift'  correction.

Conclusion :
 The Sawtooth pattern in the RMS Time History is the result of the difference in SAWbird gain at 1420M and 1423M

Inline image


                   Alex Pettit
===========================
Inline image
=============================




Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages