You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
I've seen those errors happen with a faulty SDR. When it falls over, is the device really hot?
Alex P
unread,
Apr 24, 2026, 3:41:57 PM (yesterday) Apr 24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Two comments :
1) 40 seconds is short for acquiring optimal S/N data with 1m class systems .. Consider 1 degree in drift = 4mins = 240 seconds
2) The acquisition configuration is consuming as much time acquiring 1423 MHz 'correction' information as HLine data.
That can be derived from cold_sky regions within the HLine Frames, and thus, no 'sky time' is lost.
Andrew Thornett
unread,
3:44 AM (13 hours ago) 3:44 AM
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Alex is right of course, although ezRA can obtain excellent plots with short integration times and that allows less data to be discarded if you are taking the time to remove data with bad RFI spikes.
If ezCol uses default settings for frequency offset at 1423 MHz for reference sample collection then indeed you lose half the time collecting reference samples. However there is a setting in ezCol which allows you to define how often you collect a reference
sample - if this is set to 1:10 then you will lose only 10% of your time - not as good (in terms of reducing loss of time to colleft referende samples) as using frequency outside region of interest in the signal sample suggested by Alex, but does limit data
collection time loss.
From: 'Alex P' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 10:41:57 PM To: Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> Subject: [SARA] Re: Strange Errors with EZRA
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Thank you all for your help!
Conrad
Alex P
unread,
3:12 PM (2 hours ago) 3:12 PM
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
A Suggestion : if using the freq shift correction, capture 120 sec frames and correct every 5 frames.= 5 data frames, 1 correction frame, 5 data frames, 1 correction frame etc