How to estimate aperture efficiency

91 views
Skip to first unread message

Eduard Mol

unread,
Dec 4, 2023, 4:42:05 AM12/4/23
to sara-list
…of my 1 meter dish?
In this document by Astropeiler (https://astropeiler.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Part2_The_3-Meter_Dish_Astropeiler_Stockert_Characterisation_and_Observations.pdf) they used the Sun, however I could not find recent solar flux measurements at Ka band (20-22 GHz). Another issue is that the Sun angular diameter is about half the beamwidth
I was thinking of using the Moon instead, still the same issue with its angular extent but atleast its temperature varies in a predictable way.

Best,
Eduard

Marko Cebokli

unread,
Dec 4, 2023, 9:50:07 AM12/4/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com

The Sun is pretty crazy lately, so I suggest the Moon. You will probably have less than a dB ratio, but that can be measured.

Note that with this method, you are measuring G/T, not efficiency. Which is actualy what you want to optimize in a receiving system.


Marko Cebokli



2023-12-04 10:41, je Eduard Mol napisal

...of my 1 meter dish?


--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/CAFcm1Q6vV34ys6YJDz1FXLErhopzX16e-vk2ATK9VjQmG_jMKA%40mail.gmail.com.

Eduard Mol

unread,
Dec 4, 2023, 2:31:17 PM12/4/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Marco.
The Moon is quite easily detectable with my system (~0.5 dB). 
By the way, what exactly do you mean with “G/T”?

Best,
Eduard

Op ma 4 dec 2023 om 15:50 schreef Marko Cebokli <s57...@hamradio.si>

Marko Cebokli

unread,
Dec 4, 2023, 3:46:01 PM12/4/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com

Hello Eduard,

G/T is gain over (noise) temperature. It is a ratio that tells how good you are at receiving.The Moon/cold sky ratio will increase both with higher gain and lower noise (total noise, LNA + antenna), therefore you want to maximize G/T.

Optimizing for (dish) antenna efficiency might increase its noise pickup and in fact reduce your sensitivity. Therefore, for sensitivity, it sometimes makes sense to sacrifice some gain for a lower antenna noise, like with a lower edge illumination / deeper dish.

If your LNA noise is high, this is not so important, and you can just go for gain (efficiency). But with a super low noise LNA, antenna noise pickup (300K ground...) will become a significant part of your total noise, and reducing the gain a bit to reduce noise-sucking sidelobes can improve your sensitivity.

For example, if you could reduce the antenna noise from 60K to 30K by sacrificing 1dB of gain:

300K LNA:  (300+60)/(300+30)=1.09=0.37dB noise reduction :  does not make sense,  G/T reduces by 1-0.37  = 0.63dB

30K LNA: (30+60)/(30+30)=1.54=1.87dB noise reduction:  does make sense, G/T improves by 0.87dB


Marko Cebokli



2023-12-04 20:31, je Eduard Mol napisal

B & MR Randall

unread,
Dec 5, 2023, 7:39:38 AM12/5/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com

Marko, Eduard,

Another point.  All the noise from digital devices, etc can be a lot greater than 300K, so giving up gain for a cleaner pattern can be helpful.  The digital noises of the world come and go as devices are turned on and off.  G/(T+Digital_noise)??

 

Different antenna aiming can change both T and Digital_noise.  Measurements at elevation of 90 degrees and 2 o3  beamwidths above the horizon may tell us something.

 

Nearby cell sites making overload effects in a preamp is another problem that is helped with a cleaner antenna pattern.  Note that the antenna pattern may be different at the cell site frequencies.

 

Maybe I am a little grumpy from all the extra noises in my environment!

 

Bruce Randall

Alex P

unread,
Dec 5, 2023, 7:54:13 AM12/5/23
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers

Hello Bruce,

Cell_Phone Tower noise your nemesis  ? 
If you are Not using a Tuned Cylindrical Waveguide ( Cantenna ), Try It.

It has a nice rolloff at 750 MHz.
Cantenna_750MHz_RFI_Rejection.jpg

Alex

Eduard Mol

unread,
Dec 5, 2023, 8:17:44 AM12/5/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Hi Bruce and all,

At L-band the RFI is indeed very strong at my location, but at Ka band (22GHz) it is usually quite weak (if noticeable at all) and the atmosphere is a much more significant noise source. And yes, pointing at a lower angle does definitely increase the system noise, mainly due to the increased airmass in the beam as the antenna is pointed at lower angles.
The main reasons why I was interested in getting an estimate of the aperture efficiency are:

1) to get an idea if the dish is any good at such high frequencies (if the efficiency is much lower than expected then that might point to too much surface errors or deviation from a parabolic shape)

2) to make coarse guesstimates of source fluxes. If I have decent estimates of the system temperature+atmospheric noise and effective area it should be possible to work out what the source flux should have been from the observed antenna temperature (I think- if I’m wrong please correct me :-) 

Best,
Eduard



Op di 5 dec 2023 om 13:39 schreef B & MR Randall <bran...@comporium.net>

Marko Cebokli

unread,
Dec 5, 2023, 9:34:29 AM12/5/23
to sara...@googlegroups.com

Hello Eduard!

To check the shape of your dish, a pattern measurement is the best. In fact, you only have to measure a few beamwidths around boresight (the rim moves a couple of wavelengths). There are some satellite beacons in the 20GHz band, so you could probably do it in a simple way. A well focused perfect antenna will have a clean main beam and deep nulls between main beam and first sidelobes. Note that the second requirement is good focus. Even a mm in or out will start to fill the nulls at 20GHz. So you should do many measurements while moving the focus axially, in say, 0.5mm steps.

Beacons:

https://uhf-satcom.com/satellite-reception/ka-band

The most detrimental is a big ("propeller") distortion of the dish. With a symmetrical dish (non offset) you can check for that by sighting from the side, and see if front and back rims match. Do this from two 90 deg apart directions.

Marko Cebokli


2023-12-05 14:17, je Eduard Mol napisal

bsn...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 5, 2023, 5:24:11 PM12/5/23
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Even here in semi-rural Maine we have cell towers on almost every hill.
So-called "smart meters" are now attacthed to every house. Transmit frequencines seem to be in the 902 and 2.4 Ghz bands. Output from a meter is probably much less than a cell phone.
An RFI problem?
The humorous aspect, is that Maine has a lot of trees and trees absorb a lot of RF...so for much of the year when there are leaves on the trees the meters are unreadable from much of a distance. 
And so a nice young woman comes and reads the meter on our house every so often.
We are wash in RF.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages