Team,
Ā Can anyone detail the expected beamwidth of a cantenna designed for 1.42 GHz ?
I have a team of undergrad engineers working on a 1.42 GHz design for H1 hydrogen.
They are using a Nooelec LNA tuned for 1.42 & a SDR receiver.
Ā Presently they are looking into various antenna designs.
1) A standard horn design is disadvantaged here in western New York (WNY) due to it filling with snow. :-(
2) A large solid dish ( ~ 2 M) is also not optimum due to wind loading.
So that seems to leave the following;
3) A custom Yagi LP designed for 1.42 GHz.
4) A modified DTV (Dish TV) type dish (~ 1.5' x 2').
5) A grid type parabolic dish.
The discussion presently, has been possibly using a cantenna optimized for 1.42 GHz as the sub feed for items 4 or 5. That being said, what should be the expected beamwidth of said 'can' ?
Attached please find two images;
Ā a) A plot of the optimum cantenna response @ 1.42 GHz, showing the LNA saw filter bandwidth imposed on the plot.
Ā b) An image of the cantenna diagram with three possible divergences (bandwidth sensitivity);
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 1) Parallel Sensitivity (pseudo collimatedĀ ===) Probably not likely ?
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 2) A divergence angle of 132* (degrees), when calculated from the 1/4 w stub location.
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 3) A slightly smaller angle (116*) when calculated from the back of the can resonator.
Getting this right is important if one is expected to use it as a sub-feed to maximize response & minimize noise & side lobes to either of the two main antennas.
Has anyone had any experience with this type of work?
A full (excel) worksheet is available for perusal, for serious inquiries, not included here for size/space reasons.
Thanks in advance for your time & efforts.
Sincerely,
Martin Pepe
Cloudy Skies ? Switch to a LONGER Wavelength !
Adjunct Faculty, Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program
Kate Gleason College of Engineering
Rochester Institute of Technology