Here is a drawing of my Multiplying Interferometer setup for 21cm.
With just a single 2meter dish I could only detect less then a handful of radio sources…..but with this two dish multiplying interferometer setup I have detected 36 radio sources and counting! The weakest ones just below 10 Jansky @ 1425MHz.
One big problem with my small dishes is separating several sources that are close together and the fringes interact due to the broad main lobes.
Clear skies,
Jan Lustrup – LA3EQ
Norway

Jan,
Very interesting! Any chance you could write this up for the SARA Journal?
Jack
N3ALO
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/000001dc57c5%2465dbf500%243193df00%24%40no.
On Nov 17, 2025, at 7:23 AM, 'Jan Lustrup' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Here is a drawing of my Multiplying Interferometer setup for 21cm.With just a single 2meter dish I could only detect less then a handful of radio sources…..but with this two dish multiplying interferometer setup I have detected 36 radio sources and counting! The weakest ones just below 10 Jansky @ 1425MHz.One big problem with my small dishes is separating several sources that are close together and the fringes interact due to the broad main lobes.Clear skies,Jan Lustrup – LA3EQNorway
<image001.jpg>
--
Jan - I have a couple of questions about your use of the AD8362 detector. Are you using one of those modules available through Amazon? My understanding of the AD8362 is that the output is normally logarithmic in power rather than linear in power. Although that would certainly work, it seems like the fringe signal gain would depend on system noise level and calibration could be problematical. If you are using one of those modules, does it allow you to get linear rather than log output?
Congratulations on detecting sources down to 10 Janskeys. I am
still running my 1400 MHz phase switched interferometer. A few
years ago I had to give up using one of my 3 meter dishes and
substituted a smaller out-rigger dish. To partially compensate for
the loss in sensitivity, I built a 25 MHz bandwidth receiver to
replace the 4 MHz one that I had been using. I also started
switching both antenna signals with quadrature phase switching
signals. This approach doesn't improve sensitivity but it prevents
switching signal ground currents from affecting synchronous
detector output.
Jim Abshier
--
--
Here are two weak Radio Galaxy sources detected on my 21cm interferometer.
The graph shows “3C111” that is a 15 Jansky source (@1420MHz) and “3C134” a 10 Jansky source (@1420MHz).
Going below 10 Jansky levels is possible, but you need a lot of averaging and good imagination!
Jan Lustrup LA3EQ
Norway

From: 'Jan Lustrup' via Society of Amateur Radio
Astronomers [mailto:sara...@googlegroups.com]
Sent: mandag 17. november 2025 14:24
To: sara-list@googlegroups. com
Subject: [SARA] My Interfeometer sutup
Here is a drawing of my Multiplying Interferometer setup for 21cm.
--
I just seek detection and confirmation by doing several observation runs , correlate fringe rate to known declination* & transit times and then add the data (Date and time, RA, Dec, elevation, fringe rate, fringe voltage, Flux etc) to an excel logbook of my detections.
Then I try detecting weaker and weaker sources, by improving equipment etc.
This is a little like ham radio as we enjoying collecting QSL card confirmation reports from DX (distant locations) around the world.
* Comfirmation of a source declination by fringe rate is some times very challenging with small dish antennas.
Using small antenna dishes when sources are close together in the sky it get tricky. While two or more sources are simultaneously present within the antenna beams, they produce fringe oscillations with slightly different frequencies, resulting from differences in the source declinations. Maxima in the fringe amplitude, which occur when the fringe components happen to combine in phase, can mimic responses to other sources. Many sources are close together near the milky way center and telling them apart is not easy.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/004c01dc5895%24e08b9e10%24a1a2da30%24%40no.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/004c01dc5895%24e08b9e10%24a1a2da30%24%40no.
Is this a secondary address for you? If so, you can modify your Google profile.
If this is for someone else, please have them join the group through the normal join option.
(We have enough spammers and hackers that try to join or succeed and try to send trash that I hope you understand our skittish behavior at directly adding people to the group.)
Ed H.
Co-moderator
From: 'Jan Lustrup' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers [mailto:sara...@googlegroups.com]
Sent: mandag 17. november 2025 14:24
To: sara-list@googlegroups. com
Subject: [SARA] My Interfeometer sutup
Here is a drawing of my Multiplying Interferometer setup for 21cm.
With just a single 2meter dish I could only detect less then a handful of radio sources…..but with this two dish multiplying interferometer setup I have detected 36 radio sources and counting! The weakest ones just below 10 Jansky @ 1425MHz.
One big problem with my small dishes is separating several sources that are close together and the fringes interact due to the broad main lobes.
Clear skies,
Jan Lustrup – LA3EQ
Norway
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/1931197093.7292940.1763480148776%40mail.yahoo.com.
Hi Eduard,
That sounds like a good idea….But how to make a FFT from the fringe data?
Maybe using Spectran, Argo or Speclab?
Jan
A different problem when using small antenna dishes is when sources are close together in the sky. When two or more sources are simultaneously present within the antenna beams, they produce fringe oscillations with slightly different frequencies, resulting from differences in the source declinations. Maxima in the fringe amplitude, which occur when the fringe components happen to combine in phase, can mimic responses to other sources.
This is a serious problem because the beams of my interferometer antennas were too wide.
From: sara...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:sara...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Eduard Mol
Sent: tirsdag 18. november 2025 15:51
To: sara...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SARA] My Interfeometer sutup
Hi Jan, have you tried running an FFT over the fringe data? That should give you an accurate measurement of the fringe period. Maybe you can use it to tell apart sources that overlap in the main beam but which have different declinations. The wonderful folks at Astropeiler also used this trick with their 2X1.2m Ku band interferometer, see also
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/CAFcm1Q6zMcM0BDSshCjib%2B9kXdBrdF17__RoQBzdh3J2pottgw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/006201dc58a6%247af84a60%2470e8df20%24%40no.
Jan ,
The attached image was produced from the fringe data shown in the
plot by taking a running FFT over a width that is about the same
as the extent of the fringes. Starting at some point before the
fringes, define a window that is about the same extent as the
fringes and take an FFT of the data in the window. Save the FFT
data as a column vector for the image. Then shift the window to
the next point (which could be several samples ahead) and take an
FFT of fringe data in that window. This then becomes the next
column of the image. Repeat this procedure to a point beyond the
fringes and you will have produced an image with the data
compressed in the vertical direction by the FFT and imaged in the
horizontal direction at roughly the same resolution of your
antenna beam. I think of it as a hybrid aperture synthesis imaging
technique. The horizontal axis is right ascension and the vertical
axis is declination. I am unaware of any "canned" software that is
available for doing this, so you are on your own to code it.
I use octave to process fringe data, but python or anything that includes an FFT function would be appropriate.
Jim Abshier
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/006201dc58a6%247af84a60%2470e8df20%24%40no.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/003001dc5880%242b417300%2481c45900%24%40no.