Test environment: SDRangel and VIRGO running on Ubuntu.
I was testing my local setup, observing near Capella (see attached Stellarium screenshot). I noticed that when my monitor is on, the H-line becomes very difficult to distinguish with the Airspy Mini in SDRangel, while it remains more clearly visible with the HackRF One. I have observed this several times over the last month.
I’ve also observed that if the RFI increases beyond this level, I stop getting usable results from the Airspy Mini and then even the RFI is not visible in the spectrum, at that point the spectrum becomes flat and then develops wavy small lines (I'll try to post the images of that soon) but the HackRF still gives the result.
Both SDRs were tested in SDRangel with same pointing and max gain settings. With the monitor off (reduced RFI), both perform similarly.
Attached:
Today's SDRangel screenshots from both SDRs, with and without RFI
VIRGO plot from HackRF with RFI, captured at the same time and pointing
I'll run longer observations and then compare again. Tried various Airspy Mini settings but couldn't improve results in the high-RFI condition when it becomes wavy (not shown in these images). Can anyone suggest why I'm not getting good results with the Airspy Mini? As I believe maybe I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks
HackRF without Monitor RFI: 
Airspy without Monitor RFI:

HackRF with RFI: (Monitor ON)

Airspy Mini with RFI:


Hi Alex,
Yes, possibly. I've observed this several times with my setup, the airspymini sometimes doesn't even show the RFI, just a flat spectrum with small wavy repeating structures. Once the RFI is reduced, it starts working again. The HackRF, however, keeps working fine and clearly detects the H-line. I'll test more.
I'll share that wavy spectrum image soon.
Thanks.

Hi Alex,
Yes, for sure the effort should be in reducing the RFI because once it saturates the LNA front-end, no amount of software processing can recover the signal, but I wanted to share this as an observation because sometimes RFI can't be controlled (e.g., from neighbors).
The HackRF's DC spike can be fixed using calibration (e.g., like VIRGO does in the above plot) or by offsetting the center frequency away from the target, but yes it's always better to not have it in the first place.
I'll work on reducing the RFI, but as a test I'll post longer observations using both SDRs with and without Monitor/PowerStation RFI.
Thanks



Is the older Mac turned on or acting just as barrier?
From: 'Stephen Arbogast' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: 26 January 2026 23:31
To: Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [SARA] Re: Observation: Airspy Mini and HackRF One under my local RFI and non-RFI conditions
All.... I finally solved my major RFI problem by placing my older iMac from 2012 between my Dell monitor and my dish.
See... photo
I still occasionally get RFI from neighbors. Oh well.

On Monday, January 26, 2026 at 11:27:50 AM UTC-7 b alex pettit jr wrote:
The overall background level has shifted upward : much more with the ASmini
Less with the Hack
Reduce the Gain of the AS mini so the non RFI levels of it matches the Hack ( from -23 dB to -28 dB ) and ReTest
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/39f68435-c54a-48b3-9aeb-01444e7f8c4dn%40googlegroups.com.



Hi Stephen, Alex
Even though the HackRF is less sensitive, I'm observing (for my setup) that the Airspy Mini often struggles to clearly detect the H-line, even when slight RFI is present (at max gain - I'll test with reduced gain soon). The HackRF, however, consistently detects it well. The attached plot is from my 6-hour observation last night using the HackRF One.
Over the past month, I've noticed several instances where the Airspy Mini couldn't detect even a faint H-line, while the HackRF detected it consistently (as shown in my previous message). Sometimes when RFI levels get very high, the Airspy Mini stops showing even the RFI itself, yet the HackRF still detects the H-line.
I'm not sure why this happens, but my guess is that the Airspy Mini's higher sensitivity makes it more susceptible to RFI saturation, whereas the "deafer" HackRF handles it better.
By the way, I'm using the latest official HackRF One. Which HackRF do you have ? You can try testing same by turning your monitor on or off ( OR by removing that iMac :) )
ayushman@ayushman-i914900KS:/mnt/extra$ hackrf_info
hackrf_info version: 2024.02.1
libhackrf version: 2024.02.1 (0.9)
Found HackRF
Index: 0
Serial number:
Board ID Number: 2 (HackRF One)
Firmware Version: 2024.02.1 (API:1.08)
Part ID Number:
Hardware Revision: r10
Hardware appears to have been manufactured by Great Scott Gadgets.
Hardware supported by installed firmware:
HackRF One
Thanks.
Attached are the plots from tonight's HackRF observation:





Key Components:
And to fix the HackRF drift issues, I'm getting one of these OCXOs, as I can't find a cheap GPSDO.


