Greetings Gentlemen!
Has anyone on the group looked at the SPF-5122Z MMIC (RFMD) device?
This IC has been used for quite a while in Europe and is catching on here. I
have been looking at it for our cubesat groundstation LNA because of RFI and low
noise requirement at 437 MHz. It is designed to cover 50-4000 MHz.
It offers .65 dB NF (<49 K) at 1500 MHz at 14.5 dB gain, 36 dBm IP3
and +19 dBm output power !
It deserves a serious look! Particularly if you are looking for an
amp that won't "crunch" under nearby large out of band signals, state of the art
in noise figure, broadband for several observing band operation, and low
cost!
I bought several amps from Goran Popovic AD6IW, and found them very good,
as advertised. The only drawback to the device for me is mounting them,
they are damn tiny! (His single stage is about 60.00 each)
I lucked into a large quantity of these mounted, on microwave PCB, in
a 3 amplifier config., (single LNA driving a balanced amp). I have been
converting these by adding SMA connectors and removing the 3 dB hybrid on the
front end that gave CP from the dual antenna feed. They work
great. If anyone want one for themselves, get in touch with me
directly. I can make them available in raw form with ddetails for
conversion for 25.00 plus shipping if anyone is interested. They run on 5VDC at
about 200 mA for the 3 amplifiers. These have enough gain to work well
followed by a filter like Marcus has. (I bought some from him years ago and
they are slick!)
The gain and NF of my non-optimized amplifier is as follows:
Freq. Gain
(dB) NF
(dB)
144 MHz
40 .86
216-222
Mhz 41 .85 Radar
Fence
408-437 42 .58
610 40 .81
903 35 1.0
1296 30.3 .92
1421 28.6 .99
By changing caps and bias inductors, the sweet spot in gain/NF can be
moved around. I was very happy as the sweet spot occurred at my desired
frequency of 437 MHz. My noise figure meter goes directly to 1500 MHz and
I was too lazy to put the converter in front for 2304 & 3456 MHz. It
is obvious that the quadrature couplers in the balanced section are playing a
part in the performance, but still, not bad! And no tinkering except mounting
connectors.
I will have some at SARA this year and may have a short (time-filler) talk
about the chip.
Anyway, good discussion!
73
Jeff Kruth
WA3ZKR